² Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism, Cleveland and New York, Meridian Books, 1958, p. 269.Google Scholar

³ Arendt, cited in Matthew Gibney, The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 1. Cf. Jennifer Hyndman, Managing Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of Humanitarianism, Minneapolis, Minnesota University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

⁴ UNHCR, State of the World's Refugees, 2006, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

⁵ Derek Gregory, The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq, Malden, Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

⁶ Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

⁷ Butler, Judith, Precarious Life, New York, Verso, 2004, pp. 67 and 92.Google Scholar

⁸ Gregory, Derek, ‘Vanishing Points: Law, Violence, and Exception in the Global War Prison’, in D. Gregory and A. Pred (eds), Violent Geographies, New York, Routledge, 2007, p. 207.Google Scholar

⁹ Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘Conflict, Citizenship, and Human Security: Geographies of Protection’, in D. Cowen and E. Gilbert (eds), War, Citizenship, Territory, New York and London, Routledge, 2007, pp. 241–59.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Mountz, Alison, ‘Human Smuggling and the Canadian State’, Canadian Foreign Policy, 13: 1 (2006), pp. 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Gregory, The Colonial Present.Google Scholar

¹² Hyndman, Managing Displacement.Google Scholar

¹³ Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘Preventive, Palliative, or Punitive? Safe Spaces in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Somalia, and Sri Lanka’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 16: 2 (2003), pp. 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Ian McEwan, Saturday, London, Cape, 2005, p. 39.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Bigo, Didier, ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’, Alternatives, 27 (2002), pp. 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘The Securitisation of Fear in Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97: 2 (2007), pp. 361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Amoore, Louise and De Goede, Marieke, ‘Governance, Risk and Dataveillance in the War on Terror’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 43 (2005), pp. 149–73,CrossRefGoogle Scholar p. 168.

¹⁸ Alison Mountz, Transnational States of Migration: Human Smuggling and the Borders of Sovereignty, forthcoming.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Alison Mountz, ‘Embodied Geographies of the Nation-State: An Ethnography of Canada's Response to Human Smuggling’, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 2003; and Mountz, ‘Human Smuggling and the Canadian State’.Google Scholar

²⁰ Walters, William, ‘Secure Borders, Safe Haven, Domopolitics’, Citizenship Studies, 8: 3 (2004), pp. 237–60,CrossRefGoogle Scholar p. 241.

²¹ Deborah Cowen and Emily Gilbert, ‘Citizenship in the “Homeland”: Families at War’, in Cowan and Gilbert, War, Citizenship, Territory, pp. 261–8.Google Scholar

²² Sparke, Matthew, ‘The Neoliberal Nexus’, Political Geography, 25: 2 (2006), pp. 151–80,CrossRefGoogle Scholar p. 153.

²³ Bigo, ‘Security and Immigration’, p. 63.Google Scholar

²⁴ See for example Hugo, Graeme, ‘From Compassion to Compliance? Trends in Refugee and Humanitarian Migration in Australia’, Geoforum, 55 (2001), pp. 27–37;Google Scholar and Suvendrini Perera, ‘What is a Camp…?’, Borderlands e-journal, 1: 1 (2002), pp. 1–10, available at http://www.borderlandsejournal.adelaide.edu.au/vol1no1_2002/perera_camp.html.

²⁵ Australian Government Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC), Managing the Border: Immigration Compliance, 2004–2005 Edition, 2006, p. 5, available at http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/compliance/managing-the-border/index.htm.Google Scholar

²⁶ Interview, Canberra, April 2006.Google Scholar

²⁷ Mountz, Transnational States of Migration, forthcoming.Google Scholar

²⁸ Peter Mares, Borderline, Sydney, University of New South Wales Press, 2002.Google Scholar

²⁹ Bashford, Alyson and Strange, Caroline, ‘Asylum-Seekers and National Histories of Detention’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 48: 4 (2002), pp. 509–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

³⁰ Mountz, Alison, ‘Embodying the Nation-State: Canada's Response to Human Smuggling’, Political Geography, 23: 3 (2004), pp. 323–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³¹ Sparke, ‘The Neoliberal Nexus’.Google Scholar

³² Bloch, Alice and Schuster, Lise, ‘At the Extremes of Exclusion: Deportation, Detention and Dispersal’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28: 3 (2005), pp. 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³³ Michael Welch, Detained: Immigration Laws and the Expanding I.N.S. Jail Complex, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

³⁴ Butler, Precarious Life.Google Scholar

³⁵ Mountz ‘Embodying the Nation-State’.Google Scholar

³⁶ Agamben, Homo Sacer.Google Scholar

³⁷ Magner, Tara, ‘A Less than “Pacific” Solution for Asylum Seekers in Australia’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 16: 1 (2004), pp. 53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁸ Eventually, with intervention by the UNHCR, some were resettled in third countries like New Zealand and Canada. This became a popular strategy for Australian officials to ‘save face’, successfully refusing to resettle migrants arriving by sea while quietly brokering deals with other countries to resettle, thus continuing the public deferral and refusal of direct arrivals.Google Scholar

³⁹ Taylor, Savitri, ‘Sovereign Power at the Border’, Public Law Review, 16: 1 (2005), pp. 55–77.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Betts, Alexander, ‘The International Relations of the “New” Extraterritorial Approaches to Refugee Protection: Explaining the Policy Initiatives of the UK Government and UNHCR’, Refuge, 22: 1 (2004), pp. 58–70,Google Scholar p. 63.

⁴¹ Mares, Borderline.Google Scholar

⁴² Gordon, Freeing Ali.Google Scholar

⁴³ Interview, Canberra, April 2006.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ DIAC, Managing the Border.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Now the largest numbers of detainees are ‘visa overstayers’. DIAC has shifted its resources to aggressive round-ups of people found in non-compliance with the conditions of visas.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Commission of the European Communities, ‘Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on Immigration and Asylum Policies’, COM (94) 23 final, Brussels, 23 February 1994.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Samers, Michael, ‘An Emerging Geopolitics of “Illegal” Immigration in the European Union’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 6 (2004), pp. 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁸ Lise Schuster, ‘The Realities of a New Asylum Paradigm’, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society Working Paper 20, 2005, available at http://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/publications/Working%20papers/Liza%20Schuster%20wp0520.pdf.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Council of the European Union, ‘Note from Presidency to K4 Committee: Strategy Paper on Immigration and Asylum Policy’, CK4 27, ASIM 170, 9809/98 (OR.d) Brussels, 1 July 1998, paragraph 41.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Ibid., paragraphs 27 and 37.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Ibid., paragraph 41, emphasis added.Google Scholar

⁵² The 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam created the legal framework for a common European asylum system; for details, see UNHCR, State of the World's Refugees, 2006, p. 34. The Hague Programme of 2004 was a precursor to this; it set out a plan to develop ‘freedom, security and justice’ for the EU but one that underscores the right to seek asylum; see ibid., p. 35.Google Scholar

⁵³ General Affairs Council, press release, 6/12/1998 (Press:431 Nr: 13677/98), 5–6 December 1998.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Boswell, Christine, ‘The External Dimension of EU Immigration and Asylum Policy’, International Affairs, 79: 3 (2003), pp. 619–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁵ European Council, Presidency Conclusions, 15 and 16 October 1999.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Council of the European Union, Presidency Conclusions, Seville, 21 and 22 June 2002.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ See for example press conference between Prime Minister Tony Blair and Prime Minister José Maria Aznar, 19 June 2002, available at http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page1718.asp.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Ben Hayes and T. Bunyan, ‘Migration, Development and the EU Security Agenda’, Statewatch, 2003, available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/sep/bhtb.pdf.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Cited in Betts, ‘The International Relations of the “New” Extraterritorial Approaches to Refugee Protection’, p. 59.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ UNHCR, State of the World's Refugees, 2006, p. 40.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Council of the European Union, Presidency Conclusions, Thessaloniki, 19–20 June, 2003.Google Scholar

⁶² Cited in Betts, ‘The International Relations of the “New” Extraterritorial Approaches to Refugee Protection’, p. 63.Google Scholar

⁶³ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Cited in Samers, ‘An Emerging Geopolitics of “Illegal” Immigration’, p. 43, emphasis added.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Cited in UNHCR, State of the World's Refugees, 2006 SOWR, pp. 60–1.Google Scholar