Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-xqrh7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-17T00:04:56.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration at What Price? The Erosion of National Democracy in the Euro Periphery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2017

Matthias Matthijs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The euro crisis brought back a widening gap in prosperity between the eurozone’s core and periphery members, but also revealed a divergence in the strength of its national democracies. This article examines the amplified tension between progressively uprooted national markets governed by a supranational technocracy and nationally organized democratic politics in the eurozone’s periphery. Building on Dani Rodrik’s globalization ‘trilemma’, this article explains the weakening of national democratic institutions in Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy since 2008. While the periphery states were forced to choose monetary integration at the expense of both democracy and sovereignty, this trade-off was mostly absent in the core. The eurozone’s policy solutions to the crisis did not allow for any democratic input, were implemented through opaque and often-undemocratic throughput processes, and resulted in deteriorating output. The article concludes that the EU crisis response made euro membership in the periphery less compatible with national democratic principles.

Keywords

crisisdemocracyeconomic policyeuroEuropean UnionSouthern Europe

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 52 , Special Issue 2: Democracy without Solidarity: Political Dysfunction in Hard Times , April 2017 , pp. 266 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Matthias Matthijs is Assistant Professor of International Political Economy at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Contact email: matthijs@jhu.edu.

References

Armingeon, K. and Guthmann, K. (2014), ‘Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007–2011’, European Journal of Political Research, 53: 423–442.Google Scholar
Ban, C. (2016), Ruling Ideas: How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. and Weale, A. (2015), ‘Political Legitimacy and European Monetary Union: Contracts, Constitutionalism and the Normative Logic of Two-Level Games’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2): 257–274.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (2009), ‘The Primacy of Economics versus the Primacy of Politics: Understanding the Ideological Dynamics of the Twentieth Century’, Perspectives on Politics, 7(3): 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2015), Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Blyth, M. and Matthijs, M. (2012), ‘The World Waits for Germany’, Foreign Affairs, online, 12 June.Google Scholar
Cavaco Silva, A. (2015), ‘Message from the President of the Republic to the Country Concerning the Appointment of the Prime Minister’, Palace of Belém, 22 October, www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgJH_bEY8IE.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.J. (1993), ‘Beyond EMU: The Problem of Sustainability’, Economics and Politics, 5(2): 187–203.Google Scholar
Cordero, G. and Simón, P. (2016), ‘Economic Crisis and Support for Democracy in Europe’, West European Politics, 39(2): 305–325.Google Scholar
Crum, B. (2013), ‘Saving the Euro at the Cost of Democracy?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4): 614–630.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P.D. (2014), ‘The Political Economy of Unmediated Democracy: Italian Austerity under Mario Monti’, West European Politics, 37(6): 1264–1281.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P.D. and Regan, A. (2014), ‘Why Don’t Governments Need Trade Unions Anymore? The Death of Social Pacts in Ireland and Italy’, Socio-Economic Review, 12(4): 723–745.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (2008), The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies throughout the World (New York: Times Books).Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006), ‘Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3): 533–562.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
González, F. (2008), Dual Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Institutionalized Regimes in Chile and Mexico (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkin, J. (2015), ‘The Troubled Southern Periphery: The Euro Experience in Italy and Spain’, in M. Matthijs and M. Blyth (eds), The Future of the Euro (New York: Oxford University Press): 161–184.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1993), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
Jones, E. (2009), ‘Output Legitimacy and the Global Financial Crisis: Perceptions Matter’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(5): 1085–1105.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (2012), ‘European Crisis, European Solidarity’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(s2): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, M. and Lake, D.A. (2013) (eds), Politics in the New Hard Times: The Great Recession in Comparative Perspective (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Kelemen, R.D. (2017), ‘Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, in this issue, doi: 10.1017/gov.2016.41.Google Scholar
Krastev, I. (2002), ‘The Balkans: Democracy without Choices’, Journal of Democracy, 13(3): 39–53.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1998), ‘Europe’s “Democratic Deficit”: The Question of Standards’, European Law Journal, 4(1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (2000), ‘The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2): 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (2015), ‘From Regulatory State to a Democratic Default’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6): 1216–1223.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013), Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy (London: Verso).Google Scholar
Matthijs, M. (2014), ‘Mediterranean Blues: The Crisis in Southern Europe’, Journal of Democracy, 25(1): 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthijs, M. (2016a), ‘The Three Faces of German Leadership’, Survival, 58(2): 135–154.Google Scholar
Matthijs, M. (2016b), ‘The Euro’s “Winner-Take-All” Political Economy: Institutional Choices, Policy Drift, and Diverging Patterns of Inequality’, Politics and Society, 44(3): 393–422.Google Scholar
Matthijs, M. and Blyth, M. (2011), ‘Why Only Germany Can Fix the Euro’, Foreign Affairs, online, 17 November.Google Scholar
Matthijs, M. and Blyth, M. (2015) (eds), The Future of the Euro (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Merler, S. (2015), ‘Waiting for the Four Presidents’ Report’, blog post, Bruegel, 10 June, http://bruegel.org/2015/06/waiting-for-the-four-presidents-report/.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2002), ‘In Defense of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4): 603–624.Google Scholar
Moschella, M. (2017), ‘When Some Are More Equal than Others: National Parliaments and Intergovernmental Bailout Negotiations in the Eurozone’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, in this issue, doi: 10.1017/gov.2016.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muro, D. and Vidal, G. (2016), ‘Political Distrust in Southern Europe since the Great Recession’, Mediterranean Politics, published early online, April, doi: 10.1080/13629395.2016.1168962.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (2013), ‘Europe Entrapped: Does the EU Have the Political Capacity to Overcome its Current Crisis?’, European Law Journal, 19(5): 595–611.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Regan, A. (2016), ‘Did Ireland’s Economy Really Grow by 26.3 Percent? Only on Paper: Here’s the Real Story’, Washington Post, 15 July, www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/07/15/did-irelands-economy-really-grow-by-26-3-percent-only-on-paper-heres-the-real-story/.Google Scholar
Roberts, K.M. (2013), ‘Market Reform, Programmatic (De)alignment, and Party System Stability in Latin America’, Comparative Political Studies, 46(11): 1422–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2011), The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
Ruggie, J.G. (1982), ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36(2): 379–415.Google Scholar
Sandbu, M. (2015), Europe’s Orphan: The Future of the Euro and the Politics of Debt (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. and Streeck, W. (2014) (eds), Politics in the Age of Austerity (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (2014), ‘Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Disabling of Democratic Accountability’, in A. Schäfer and W. Streeck (eds), Politics in the Age of Austerity (Cambridge: Polity Press): 108–142.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. (1942), Party Government (New York: Rinehart).Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2015), ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Euro Area Crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2): 177–195.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2012), ‘Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and Throughput’, Political Studies, 61(1): 2–22.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2015), ‘The Forgotten Problem of Democratic Legitimacy: “Governing by the Rules” and “Ruling by the Numbers”’, in M. Matthijs and M. Blyth (eds), The Future of the Euro (New York: Oxford University Press): 90–114.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2016), ‘Reinterpreting the Rules “By Stealth” in Times of Crisis: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission’, West European Politics, 39(5): 1032–1052.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2014), Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism (Brooklyn: Verso).Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2015), ‘The Rise of the European Consolidation State’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/1 (Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies).Google Scholar
Summers, L.H. (2016), ‘The Age of Secular Stagnation: What It Is and What to Do About It’, Foreign Affairs, 95(2): 2–9.Google Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (2012), ‘In the Face of Crisis: Input Legitimacy, Output Legitimacy and the Political Messianism of European Integration’, Journal of European Integration, 34(7): 825–841.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Matthijs supplementary material

Matthijs supplementary material 1

Download Matthijs supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 156.6 KB