Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-8sgpw Total loading time: 0.368 Render date: 2021-02-26T14:30:02.542Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Rational Choice Meets the New Politics: Choosing the Scottish Parliament’s Electoral System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

Alan Convery
Affiliation:
Alan Convery is a Lecturer in Politics in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh
Thomas Carl Lundberg
Affiliation:
Thomas Carl Lundberg is a Lecturer in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Glasgow
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Although there has been extensive research on electoral system choice at the national level, we know relatively little about the dynamics of deciding the rules of the game for sub-state institutions. This article examines the factors that influenced the choice of a proportional electoral system for the new Scottish Parliament in 1999. Through the use of archival sources and interviews with key participants, we challenge the conventional rational choice explanation for the adoption of the mixed-member proportional (MMP) system. Although rational considerations on the part of the Labour Party were involved in the choice of MMP, our findings suggest that, as at the national level, theories of electoral system choice need to consider normative values as well.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018. Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Andrews, JT Jackman, RW (2005) Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice Under Extreme Uncertainty. Electoral Studies 24(1), 6584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A Checkel, JT (2015) Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices. In Bennett A and Checkel JT (eds), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 337.Google Scholar
Bennie, L, Brand, J Mitchell, J (1997) How Scotland Votes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bennie, L Clark, A (2003) Towards Moderate Pluralism: Scotland’s Post-Devolution Party System, 1999–2002. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 13(1), 134155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, K (2004) Models of Electoral System Change. Electoral Studies 23(3), 363389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A, Dobrzynska, A Indridason, IH (2005) To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice. British Journal of Political Science 35(1), 182190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohrer, RE II Krutz, GS (2005) The Devolved Party Systems of the United Kingdom: Sub-national Variations from the National Model. Party Politics 11(6), 654673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C (1999) Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies. American Political Science Review 93(3), 609624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, S, Donovan, T Karp, JA (2006) Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology? Journal of Politics 68(2), 434446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, J, McLean, D Miller, W (1983) The Birth and Death of a Three-Party System: Scotland in the Seventies. British Journal of Political Science 13(4), 463488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A (2000) Designing the Scottish Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 53(3), 542556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, KR, Blais, A Fournier, P (2008) When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. In Blais A (ed.), To Keep or to Change First Past the Post? Oxford: Oxford University Press: 140163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W (1993) Convention Threatened by Row over Women’s Seats. The Herald (Glasgow), 1 November.Google Scholar
Cole, M (1999) Party Policy and Electoral Reform: A Survey of Developments, Motives and Prospects. British Elections and Parties Review 9, 7286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, J (2005) It’s Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down). Political Studies 53(1), 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtice, J (1996) Why the Additional Member System has Won Out in Scotland. Representation 33(4), 119124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denver, D Bochel, H (2007) A Quiet Revolution: STV and the Scottish Council Elections of 2007. Scottish Affairs 61, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Farrell, DM McAllister, I (2006) The Australian Electoral System: Origins, Variations and Consequences. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Green, DP Shapiro, I (1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grumm, J (1958) Theories of Electoral Systems. Midwest Journal of Political Science 2(4), 357376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, G Shaw, E (2012) The Strange Death of Labour Scotland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, P (1992) The Scottish Experience in Proportion. In Smyth G (ed.), Refreshing the Parts: Electoral Reform and British Politics. London: Lawrence & Wishart: 6880.Google Scholar
Katz, R (2005) Why Are There So Many (or So Few) Electoral Reforms? In Gallagher M and Mitchell P (eds), The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 5776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laasko, M Taagepera, R (1979) ‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1), 327.Google Scholar
Labour Party, Scottish Council (1991) Letter to Bruce Black, Secretary, Scottish Constitutional Convention. GD489: Records of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, 1989–1996. Edinburgh: National Archives of Scotland.Google Scholar
Lamare, JW Vowles, J (1996) Party Interests, Public Opinion and Institutional Preferences: Electoral System Change in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science 31(3), 321345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyenaar, M Hazan, RY (2011) Reconceptualising Electoral Reform. West European Politics 34(3), 437455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindsay, I (1992) Letter to Bruce Black, Secretary, Scottish Constitutional Convention. GD489: Records of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, 1989–1996. Edinburgh: National Archives of Scotland.Google Scholar
Macwhirter, I (1991) Labour Mends Split Over Electoral Reform. Scotland on Sunday, 15 December, 6.Google Scholar
Massicotte, L (2003) To Create or to Copy? Electoral Systems in the German Länder. German Politics 12(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, A (2004) Scottish Local Government. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J (1990) Conservatives and the Union. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J (2000) New Parliament, New Politics in Scotland. Parliamentary Affairs 53(3), 605621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J (2010) The Narcissism of Small Differences: Scotland and Westminster. Parliamentary Affairs 63(1), 98116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilet, J-B (2008) The Future is Imagination, the Present is Reality: Why Do Big Ruling Parties Oppose Majority Systems? A Belgian Case Study. Representation 44(1), 4150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, JH (1977) Party Interests and the Electoral System for the Projected Scottish Assembly. Political Quarterly 48(2), 186200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, G (2004) The Study of the Politics of Electoral Reform in the 1990s: Theoretical and Methodological Lessons. Comparative Politics 36(4), 461480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, G (2006) The Politics of Electoral Reform Abolition: The Informed Process of Israel’s Return to its Previous Electoral System. Political Studies 54(1), 4364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, G (2011) The Politics of Electoral Reform: The State of the Research. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(4), 523543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, A (2007) Why Did National Promise a Referendum on Electoral Reform in 1990? Political Science 59(1), 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, A (2010) The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, A (2011) Electoral Reform in Europe since 1945. West European Politics 34(3), 456477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A, Reilly, B Ellis, A (2005) Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S (1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Rothbauer, PM (2008) Triangulation. In Given LM (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications: 892894.Google Scholar
Sartori, G (1968) Political Development and Political Engineering. In Montgomery JD and Hirschman AO (eds), Public Policy, vol. XVII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 261298.Google Scholar
Scottish Constitutional Commission (1993) Key Extracts from Scottish Constitutional Convention Proposals for Scottish Parliament. GD489: Records of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, 1989–1996. Edinburgh: National Archives of Scotland.Google Scholar
Scottish Constitutional Convention (1992) The Final Report of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. In Paterson L and McCrone D (eds), The Scottish Government Yearbook 1992. Edinburgh: Unit for the Study of Government in Scotland, University of Edinburgh: 8497.Google Scholar
Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995) Scotland’s Parliament, Scotland’s Right. Edinburgh: Convention of Scottish Local Authorities. https://paulcairney.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/scc-1995.pdf (accessed 17 March 2018).Google Scholar
Scottish Green Party (1990) Fair Votes for Scotland. GD489: Records of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, 1989–1996. Edinburgh: National Archives of Scotland.Google Scholar
Scottish Liberal Democrats (1993) A Response to the Consultation Paper Issued by the Scottish Constitutional Commission. GD489: Records of the Scottish Constitutional Convention, 1989–1996. Edinburgh: National Archives of Scotland.Google Scholar
Shugart, MS (2008) Inherent and Contingent Factors in Reform Initiation in Plurality Systems. In Blais A (ed.), To Keep or to Change First Past the Post? Oxford: Oxford University Press: 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, MS Wattenberg, MP (2001) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: A Definition and a Typology. In Shugart MS and Wattenberg MP (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press: 924.Google Scholar
Simon, HA (1956) Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review 63(2), 129138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, B (1999) The Scottish Parliament. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, RH (2009) The Scottish Constitutional Convention, with Particular Reference to the Decision on the Electoral System to be Used by the Parliament of Scotland. MLitt dissertation: University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Van der Kolk, H (2007) Electoral System Change in the Netherlands: The Road from PR to PR. Representation 43(4), 271287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, M (2001) Year Zero: An Inside View of the Scottish Parliament. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R (2007) The United Kingdom as a Federalised or Regionalised Union. In Trench A (ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press: 239268.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 122
Total number of PDF views: 410 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 07th May 2018 - 26th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rational Choice Meets the New Politics: Choosing the Scottish Parliament’s Electoral System
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Rational Choice Meets the New Politics: Choosing the Scottish Parliament’s Electoral System
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Rational Choice Meets the New Politics: Choosing the Scottish Parliament’s Electoral System
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *