Skip to main content Accessibility help

Adapting or Freezing? Ideological Reactions of Communist Regimes to a Post-Communist World

  • Alexander Dukalskis (a1) and Johannes Gerschewski (a2)

This article studies the ideological reactions of communist regimes to the advent of a post-communist world. It examines two cases of reformed communist regimes (China and Vietnam) with two relatively unreformed cases (North Korea and Cuba) to understand different legitimation strategies employed during and after the downfall of the Soviet Union. Theoretically, the article compares two ideal-type approaches to ideology in autocratic regimes. The first approach emphasizes semantic ‘freezing’ over time. The consistency and coherence of ideology is underlined. The second approach argues that the success of an ideology lies in its ability to be a dynamic, adaptive force that can react with changing circumstances. Four parameters help to distinguish the freeze-frame end from the adaptation pole: (1) the autonomy over semantic changes, (2) the timing, (3) the velocity and (4) the distance that an ideology moves. Using qualitative case-based analysis that is enriched with quantitative text analysis of communist party documents, this article compares these contending conceptions of ideology with each other in the four cases. Sharing similar starting conditions in the 1970s, the article shows how China and Vietnam harnessed a flexible legitimation strategy while North Korea and Cuba adopted a comparatively rigid legitimation approach.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Aguirre, BE (2002) Social Control in Cuba. Latin American Politics and Society 44(2), 6798.
Almond, GA and Powell, GB (1978) Comparative Politics: System, Process, and Policy, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Armstrong, CK (2013) Ideological Introversion and Regime Survival: North Korea’s ‘Our-Style Socialism’. In Dimitrov MK (ed.), Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99119.
Barker, R (2001) Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beetham, D (1991) The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, A (2009) The Rise and Fall of Communism. London: HarperCollins.
Brown, A (2013) Communism. In Freeden M, Sargent LT and Stears M (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 364384.
Brown, K (2012) The Communist Party of China and Ideology. China: An International Journal 10(2), 5268.
Brundenius, C (2009) Revolutionary Cuba at 50: Growth with Equity Revisited. Latin American Perspectives 36(2), 3148.
Chwe, MSY (1999) Structure and Strategy in Collective Action. American Journal of Sociology 105(1), 128156.
Cole, K (2002) Cuba: The Process of Socialist Development. Latin American Perspectives 29(3), 4056.
Communist Party of Cuba (1986) Main Report, Third Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba. Havana: Editora Politica.
Cumings, B (1997) Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: Norton.
Dahl, RA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Deutsch, KW (1973) Politische Kybernetik: Modelle und Perspektiven. Freiburg: Rombach Verlag.
Dimitrov, MK (2013) Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dukalskis, A (2017) The Authoritarian Public Sphere: Legitimation and Autocratic Power in North Korea, Burma, and China. New York: Routledge.
Dukalskis, A and Gerschewski, J (2017) What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation. Contemporary Politics 23(3), 251268.
Dukalskis, A and Hooker, Z (2011) Legitimating Totalitarianism: Melodrama and Mass Politics in North Korean Film. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44(1), 5362.
Elliot, DWP (2012) Changing Worlds: Vietnam’s Transition from Cold War to Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeden, M (1994) Political Concepts and Ideological Morphology. Journal of Political Philosophy 2(2), 140164.
Freeden, M (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeden, M (2007) The Meaning of Ideology: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Freeden, M, Sargent, LT and Stears, M (eds) (2013) Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallie, WB (1956) Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56, 167198.
Gerring, J (1997) Ideology: A Definitional Analysis. Political Research Quarterly 50(4), 957994.
Gerschewski, J (2013) The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes. Democratization 20(1), 1338.
Gerschewski, J (2018) Legitimacy in Autocracies: Oxymoron or Essential Feature? Perspectives on Politics 16(3), 652665.
Gill, G (2011) Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilley, B (2009) The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grauvogel, J and von Soest, C (2014) Claims to Legitimacy Count: Why Sanctions Fail to Instigate Democratisation in Authoritarian Regimes. European Journal of Political Research 53(4), 635653.
Grimmer, J and Stewart, BM (2013) Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis: Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis 21(3), 267297.
Haggard, S and Noland, M (2007) Famine in North Korea: Markets, Aid, and Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.
Holbig, H (2013) Ideology after the End of Ideology: China and the Quest for Autocratic Legitimation. Democratization 20(1), 6181.
Jost, JT (2006) The End of the End of Ideology. American Psychologist 61(7), 651670.
Kailitz, S and Stockemer, D (2017) Regime Legitimation, Elite Cohesion and the Durability of Autocratic Regime Types. International Political Science Review 38(3), 332348.
King, G, Pan, J and Roberts, ME (2013) How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review 107(2), 118.
Knight, K (2006) Transformations of the Concept of Ideology in the Twentieth Century. American Political Science Review 100(4), 619626.
Kuran, T (1997) Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
London, J (2009) Viet Nam and the Making of Market-Leninism. Pacific Review 22(3), 375399.
Malesky, E and London, J (2014) The Political Economy of Development in China and Vietnam. Annual Review of Political Science 17, 395419.
Maynard, JL and Mildenberger, M (2018) Convergence and Divergence in the Study of Ideology: A Critical Review. British Journal of Political Science 48(2), 563589.
McAdams, AJ (2017) Vanguard of the Revolution: The Global Idea of the Communist Party. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Oh, K and Hassig, R (2000) North Korea Through the Looking Glass. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
Parsons, T (1969) Politics and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
Perez, LA (1995) Cuba: Between Reform and Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pike, D (1992) Vietnam in 1991: The Turning Point. Asian Survey 32(1), 7481.
Rabkin, R (1992) Cuban Socialism: Ideological Responses to the Era of Socialist Crisis. Cuban Studies 22, 2750.
Roberts, ME, Stewart, BM, Tingley, D, Lucas, C, Leder-Luis, J, Gadarian, SK, Albertson, B and Rand, DG (2014) Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses. American Journal of Political Science 58(4), 10641082.
Rojas, R (2007) Ideology, Culture, and Memory: Symbolic Dilemmas of the Cuban Transition. In Perez-Stable M (ed.), Looking Forward: Comparative Perspectives on Cuba’s Transition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 262279.
Saxonberg, S (2013) Transitions and Non-Transitions from Communism: Regime Survival in China, Cuba, North Korea and Vietnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schedler, A (2013) The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seckington, I (2005) Nationalism, Ideology, and China’s ‘Fourth Generation’ Leadership. Journal of Contemporary China 14(42), 2333.
Shambaugh, D (2008) China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Thayer, CA (2010) Political Legitimacy in Vietnam: Challenge and Response. Politics and Policy 38(3), 423444.
Turnbull, CM (1999) Regionalism and Nationalism. In Tarling N (ed.), Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257317.
Vietnam Communist Party (1982) Asia & Pacific Daily Report Supplement, 9 April 1982, Folder 05, Box 01, William Duiker Collection, Vietnam Center and Archive, Texas Tech University.
Vietnam Communist Party (1986) Papers on the Sixth Party Congress, 15 December 1986, Folder 06, Box 01, William Duiker Collection, Vietnam Center and Archive, Texas Tech University.
Vietnam Communist Party (1991) East Asia. Vietnam. Seventh CPV Congress, 26 June 1991, Folder 03, Box 05, United States Department of State Collection, Vietnam Center and Archive, Texas Tech University.
Vietnam Communist Party (1996) Eighth National Congress: Documents. Hanoi: Gioi Publishers.
Vincent, A (2013) Nationalism. In Freeden M, Sargent LT and Stears M (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 452473.
Vu, T (2017) Vietnam’s Communist Revolution: The Power and Limits of Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wedeen, L (1999) Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Westad, OA (2005) The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Dukalskis and Gerschewski supplementary material

 Word (351 KB)
351 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed