Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Challenge or Consent? Understanding Losers’ Reactions in Mass Elections

  • Ignacio Lago and Ferran Martinez i Coma
Abstract

The conditions under which losers are willing to challenge the results of elections remain an open question. Using data from the Electoral Integrity Project for 66 democratic and non-democratic countries in 2012 and 2013, we measure how parties or candidates react once votes have been cast and one of them is declared the winner. Do they accept or challenge the results? This measure allows us to examine the causal mechanisms that account for the self-enforcing nature of democracies. Our findings show that losers’ consent increases with free and fair elections and in more economically developed countries, while income inequality is not relevant. Additionally, the impact of free and fair elections is particularly important in more economically developed countries.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Ignacio Lago is Associate Professor of Political Science at Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona. Contact email: ignacio.lago@upf.edu.

Ferran Martinez i Coma is a Research Associate in the Department of Government and International Relations at the University of Sydney. Contact email: ferran.martinezcoma@sydney.edu.au.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorships and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Alesina, A. and Spolaore, E. (2003), The Size of Countries (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Amnesty International. (2013), ‘Turkmenistan: An “Era of Happiness” or More of the Same Repression?’, 12 December, www.amnesty.org/en/documents/EUR61/005/2013/en/.
Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Listhaug, O. (2005), Losers’ Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
BBC (2013), ‘Rights Groups Criticise Turkmenistan Elections’, BBC News, 13 December, www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-25362792.
Boix, C. (2003), Democracy and Redistribution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Chacón, M., Robinson, J.A. and Torvik, R. (2011), ‘Why is Democracy an Equilibrium? Theory and Evidence from Colombia’s La Violencia’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55: 366396.
Chernykh, S. (2014), ‘When Do Political Parties Protest Elections Results?’, Comparative Political Studies, 47: 13591383.
Diamond, L. (1999), Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Ellsworth, B. (2013), ‘Analysis: Venezuela’s Capriles Faces Tough Battle to Challenge Election’, Reuters, 18 April, www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/18/us-venezuela-election-capriles-idUSBRE93H10P20130418.
Fearon, J. (2011), ‘Self-enforcing Democracy’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126: 16611708.
Freedom House (2015), ‘Freedom in the World’, www.freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world#.UyFA0PmSxic.
Gasiorowski, M.J. and Power, T. (1998), ‘The Structural Determinants of Democratic Consolidation: Evidence from the Third World’, Comparative Political Studies, 31: 740771.
Gandhi, J. (2008), Political Institutions under Dictatorship (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Gandhi, J. and Lust-Okar, E. (2009), ‘Elections under Authoritarianism’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 403422.
Gurt, M. (2013), ‘No Whiff of Dissent in Turkmenistan’s First Multi-party Vote’, Reuters, 15 December, http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/15/uk-turkmenistan-election-idUKBRE9BE06I20131215.
Hyde, S. and Marinov, N. (2014), ‘Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Election Observation’, International Organization, 68: 329359.
Kindzeka, M.E. (2013), ‘Cameroon Opposition Says Biya Manipulating Elections’, Voice of America News, 15 August, www.voanews.com/content/cameroon-opposition-says-biya-manipulating-elections/1730632.html.
Lindberg, S.I. (2006), ‘The Surprising Significance of African Elections’, Journal of Democratization, 17: 139151.
Lindberg, S.I (2009), ‘A Theory of Elections as a Mode of Transition’, in S.I. Lindberg (ed.), Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition’ (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 314341.
Mainwaring, S. and Pérez-Liñán, A. (2013), ‘Lessons from Latin America: Democratic Breakdown and Survival’, Journal of Democracy, 24: 123137.
Martinez i Coma, F. and van Ham, C. (2015), ‘Can Experts Judge Elections? Testing the Validity of Expert Judgments for Measuring Election Integrity’, European Journal of Political Research, 54: 305325.
Musa, T. (2013), ‘Biya Keeps Grip on Cameroon with Landslide Vote Win’, Reuters, 17 October, www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/17/cameroon-election-idUSL6N0I733F20131017.
Nadeau, R. and Blais, A. (1993), ‘Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect on Participation on Losers’ Consent’, British Journal of Political Science, 23: 553563.
Norris, P. (2013), ‘Does the World Agree about Standards of Electoral Integrity? Evidence for the Diffusion of Global Norms’, Electoral Studies, 32: 576588.
Norris, P., Frank, R.W. and Martinez i Coma, F. (2013), ‘Evaluating the Quality of Elections’, Journal of Democracy, 24: 124135.
Norris, P., Frank, R.W. and Martinez i Coma, F. (2014), The Expert Survey of Perceptions of Electoral Integrity, Release 2, (PEI_2). February 2014, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/24781.
Norris, P., Frank, R.W. and Martinez i Coma, F. (2015), Contentious Elections (New York: Routledge).
ODIHR (Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights) (2013), Turkmenistan Parliamentary Elections, OSCE/ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Report, www.osce.org/odihr/elections/turkmenistan/104831.
ODIHR (Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights) (2014), Turkmenistan Parliamentary Elections, OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Final Report, www.osce.org/odihr/elections/116011.
Powell, J. (2012), ‘The Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’Etat’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56: 10171040.
Powell, J and Thyne, C.L. (2010), ‘Global Instances of Coups from 1950 to 2010: A New Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research, 48: 249259.
Przeworski, A. (1991), Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Przeworski, A (2005), ‘Democracy as an Equilibrium’, Public Choice, 123: 253273.
Przeworski, A (2006), ‘Self-Enforcing Democracy’, in B.R. Weingast and D.A. Wittman (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy’ (New York: Oxford University Press): 312328.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J.A. and Limongi, F. (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990 (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Schedler, A. (2002), ‘The Nested Game of Democratization by Elections’, International Political Science Review, 23: 103122.
Schedler, A (2009), ‘The Contingent Power of Authoritarian Elections’, in S.I. Lindberg (ed.), Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 179201.
Serra, G. (2014), ‘The 2012 Elections in Mexico: Return of the Dominant Party’, Electoral Studies, 34: 291379.
Solt, F. (2013), ‘The Standardized World Income Inequality Database’, working paper. SWIID version 4.0, September 2013, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.1/11992.
Svolik, M.W. (2008), ‘Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation’, American Political Science Review, 102: 153168.
Svolik, M.W (2015), ‘Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation’, British Journal of Political Science, 45: 715738.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed