Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Democratic Institutions Beyond the Nation State: Measuring Institutional Dissimilarity in Federal Countries

Abstract

The persistence of subnational undemocratic regimes in new democracies has recently revived interest in intra-national patterns of democratization. This article offers new data and a methodological contribution to this literature, emphasizing the measurement of institutional variation across territorial units and levels of government. Developing new measures of the unevenness of democratic institutions within individual countries, and illustrating these measures with an original data set on electoral rules in Mexico at the federal level and across 32 subnational units, we provide tools to enhance the study of democracy, particularly at the subnational level and in federal or decentralized systems. More specifically, we develop measures of institutional characteristics across a country's spatial units and of federal-to-state institutional dissimilarity – what we call system-wide institutional incongruence.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Imke Harbers is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam and a Research Fellow at the Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation. Contact email: I.Harbers@uva.nl. Matthew C. Ingram is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University at Albany, State University of New York. Contact email: mingram@albany.edu. Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C.C. Beer (2006), ‘Judicial Performance and the Rule of Law in the Mexican States’, Latin American Politics and Society, 48(3): 3336.

C.C. Beer N. Mitchell (2004), ‘Democracy and Human Rights in the Mexican States: Elections or Social Capital?’, International Studies Quarterly, 48: 293312.

J. Behrend (2011), ‘The Unevenness of Democracy at the Subnational Level: Provincial Closed Games in Argentina’, Latin American Research Review, 46(1): 150176.

J.K. Birnir (2004), ‘Stabilizing Party Systems and Excluding Segments of Society? The Effects of Formation Costs on New Party Foundation in Latin America’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(3): 327.

J.K. Birnir (2005), ‘Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization’, Comparative Political Studies, 38(8): 915938.

A. Borges (2011), ‘The Political Consequences of Center-Led Redistribution in Brazilian Federalism: The Fall of Subnational Party Machines’, Latin American Research Review, 46(3): 2145.

E. Calvo J.P. Micozzi (2005), ‘The Governor's Backyard: A Seat–Vote Model of Electoral Reform for Subnational Multiparty Races’, Journal of Politics, 67(4): 10501074.

W.M. Chandler M.A. Chandler (1987), ‘Federalism and Political Parties’, European Journal of Political Economy, 3(1–2): 87109.

B. Geddes (1999), ‘What do we Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1): 115144.

E. Gibson J. Suarez-Cao (2010), ‘Federalized Party Systems and Subnational Party Competition: Theory and an Empirical Application to Argentina’, Comparative Politics, 43(1): 2139.

F. Hagopian (1996), Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil (New York: Cambridge University Press).

S. Hug (2001), Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

M.C. Ingram (2012a), ‘Crafting Courts in New Democracies: Ideology and Judicial Council Reforms in Three Mexican States’, Comparative Politics, 44(4): 439458.

R.S. Katz P. Mair (1995), ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1(1): 528.

K.M. McMann (2006), Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyztan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

N. Miragliotta (2012), ‘From Local to National: Explaining the Formation of the Australian Green Party’, Party Politics, 18(3): 409425.

G. O'Donnell (1994), ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 5569.

R. Snyder (2001), ‘Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method’, Studies in Comparative and International Development, 36(1): 93110.

M. Spirova (2007), Political Parties in Post-Communist Societies: Formation, Persistence, and Change (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

M. Tavits (2008), ‘Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 38(1): 113133.

J. Willey (1998), ‘Institutional Arrangements and the Success of New Parties in Old Democracies’, Political Studies, 46(3): 651668.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 48 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 148 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.