Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:47:51.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Difficulty with Doctrine: How Religion Can Influence Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2015

Anna Grzymala-Busse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 327 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Anna Grzymala-Busse is Ronald and Eileen Weiser Professor of European and Eurasian Studies in the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan. Contact email: abusse@umich.edu.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, B. (2013), ‘SBC Leader Says Life Begins in Vitro’, Baptistnews.com, 18 April, www.abpnews.com/culture/social-issues/item/8414-sbc-leader-says-life-begins-in-vitro#.UbdvhLbPE98.Google Scholar
Armstrong, K. (2014), Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence (New York: Alfred Knopf).Google Scholar
Atran, S., Axelrod, R. and Davis, R. (2007), ‘Sacred Barriers to Conflict Resolution’, Science, 317: 1039–1040.Google Scholar
Balmer, R. (2006), Thy Kingdom Come (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Banchoff, T. (2012), Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Berman, E. (2009), Radical, Religious, and Violent (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Boven, J. (2010), ‘Personhood’s Jones Says Amendment’s Effect is Exaggerated but Real’, Colorado Independent, 15 July, http://coloradoindependent.com/57321/personhoods-jones-says-amendments-effects-exaggerated-but-real.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, W. (2009), The Myth of Religious Violence (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Chwe, M. (2001), Rational Ritual (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cook, M. (2014), Ancient Religions, Modern Politics: The Islamic Case in Comparative Perspective (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Dagli, C. (2015), ‘The Phony Islam of ISIS’, Atlantic Monthly, February, www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/02/what-muslims-really-want-isis-atlantic/386156.Google Scholar
Esposito, J. (2010), The Future of Islam (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Esposito, J. and Mogahed, D. (2009), Who Speaks for Islam? (New York: Gallup Press).Google Scholar
Fish, M.S. (2011), Are Muslims Distinctive? (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goodstein, L. (2001), ‘Abortion Foes Split Over Bush’s Plan on Stem Cells’, New York Times, 12 August, www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/national/12RIGH.html.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2015), Nations Under God (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Panel (1988), ‘Report of the Advisory Committee to the Director, National Institutes of Health: Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research’, Bethesda, 14 December, http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/past_commissions/fetal_tissue_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2015a), ‘What the Atlantic Left Out about ISIS According to their Own Expert’, ThinkProgress.org, 20 February, http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015/02/20/3625446/atlantic-left-isis-conversation-bernard-haykel.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J (2015b), ‘What the Atlantic Gets Dangerously Wrong About ISIS and Islam’, ThinkProgress.org, 18 February, http://thinkprogress.org/world/2015/02/18/3624121/atlantic-gets-dangerously-wrong-isis-islam.Google Scholar
Kahl, S. (2005), ‘The Religious Roots of Modern Poverty Policy: Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant Traditions Compared’, European Journal of Sociology, 46(1): 91–126.Google Scholar
Kahl, S (2014), ‘Poverty and Eternity: How Religion Shapes Assistance to the Poor, from Early Church to Modern Welfare State’, manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
Kuran, T. (2011), The Long Divergence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Moghul, H. (2015), ‘The Atlantic’s Big Islam Lie: What Muslims Really Believe about ISIS’, Salon.com, 19 February, www.salon.com/2015/02/19/the_atlantics_big_islam_lie_what_muslims_really_believe_about_isis.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. (2009), ‘The Religious Foundations of Work–Family Policies in Western Europe’, in K. van Kerbergen and P. Manow (eds), Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States (New York: Cambridge University Press): 56–90.Google Scholar
Perica, V. (2002), Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Putnam, R. and Campbell, D. (2010), American Grace (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. (2001), ‘Bush’s Stem-cell Fumble’, Salon.com, 10 August, www.salon.com/2001/08/10/stem_cell_5.Google Scholar
Southern Baptist Convention (1999), ‘Resolution on Human Embryonic and Stem Cell Research’, Southern Baptist Convention, June, www.sbc.net/resolutions/amResolution.asp?ID=620.Google Scholar
Spiro, M. (1966), ‘Religion: A Problem of Definition and Explanation’, in M. Banton (ed.), Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion (London: Tavistock Publications): 85–126.Google Scholar
Stark, R. (1999), ‘Micro Foundations of Religion: A Revised Theory’, Sociological Theory, 17(3): 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R (2003), For the Glory of God (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Stark, R (2012), America’s Blessings (West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press).Google Scholar
Stark, R and Finke, R. (2000), Acts of Faith (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Toft, M. (2007), ‘Getting Religion? The Puzzling Case of Islam and Civil War’, International Security, 30(Spring): 97–131.Google Scholar
Wald, K. and Calhoun-Brown, A. (2014), Religion and Politics in the United States (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).Google Scholar
Weigel, G. (1999), ‘Roman Catholicism in the Age of John Paul II’, in P. Berger (ed.), The Desecularization of the World (Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center): 19–36.Google Scholar
Wertz, D. (2002), ‘Embryo and Stem Cell Research in the United States: History and Politics’, Gene Therapy, 9: 674–678.Google Scholar
White House (1994), ‘Statement by the President’, Office of the Press Secretary, 2 December, http://clinton6.nara.gov/1994/12/1994-12-02-president-on-nih-and-human-embryo-research.html.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2015), ‘What ISIS Really Wants’, Atlantic Monthly, March, www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980.Google Scholar
Woodberry, R. (2011), ‘Religion and the Spread of Human Capital and Political Institutions’, in R. McCleary (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press): 111–131.Google Scholar
Woodberry, R and Shah, T. (2004), ‘The Pioneering Protestants’, Journal of Democracy, 15(2): 47–61.Google Scholar