Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America

Abstract

Although there is a lively academic debate about contemporary populism in Europe and Latin America, almost no cross-regional research exists on this topic. This article aims to fill this gap by showing that a minimal and ideological definition of populism permits us to analyse current expressions of populism in both regions. Moreover, based on a comparison of four prototypical cases (FN/Le Pen and FPÖ/Haider in Europe and PSUV/Chávez and MAS/Morales in Latin America), we show that it is possible to identify two regional subtypes of populism: exclusionary populism in Europe and inclusionary populism in Latin America.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Cas Mudde is Assistant Professor in the Department of International Affairs of the University of Georgia. Contact email: mudde@uga.edu. Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser is Marie Curie Research Fellow in the Department of Politics of the University of Sussex. Contact email: c.rovira@sussex.ac.uk.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Albertazzi D. McDonnell (eds) (2008), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western Democracy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

T. Bale , S. van Kessel P. Taggart (2011), ‘Thrown around with Abandon? Popular Understandings of Populism as Conveyed by the Print Media: A UK Case Study’, Acta Politica, 46(2): 111131.

H-G. Betz (1994), Radical Right-wing Populism in Western Europe (Basingstoke: Macmillan).

H-G. Betz (2001), ‘Exclusionary Populism in Austria, Italy, and Switzerland’, International Journal, 56(3): 393420.

H-G. Betz S. Meret (2009), ‘Revisiting Lepanto: The Political Mobilization against Islam in Contemporary Western Europe’, Patterns of Prejudice, 43(3–4): 313334.

A. Brewer-Carías (2010), Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chávez Authoritarian Experiment (New York: Cambridge University Press).

M. Canovan (1999), ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, 47(1): 34.

F. Decker (2008), ‘Germany: Right-wing Populist Failures and Left-wing Successes’, in D. Albertazzi and D. McDonnell (eds), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western Democracy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan): 119134.

P. Domingo (2009), ‘Evo Morales, the MAS, and a Revolution in the Making’, in J. Grugel and P. Riggirozzi (eds), Governance after Neoliberalism in Latin America (New York: Palgrave Macmillan): 113145.

K. Eaton (2011), ‘Conservative Autonomy Movements: Territorial Dimensions of Ideological Conflict in Bolivia and Ecuador’, Comparative Politics, 43(3): 291310.

M. Freeden (1996), Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach (Oxford: Clarendon).

M. Freeden (1998), ‘Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?’, Political Studies, 46(4): 748765.

K. Hawkins (2010), Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective (New York: Cambridge University Press).

D. Hough M. Koß (2009), ‘Populism Personified or Reinvigorated Reformers? The German Left Party in 2009 and Beyond’, German Politics and Society, 27(2): 7691.

P. Ignazi (1992), ‘The Silent Counter-Revolution: Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right-wing Parties in Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 22(1–2): 334.

H. Kriesi , E. Grande , R. Lachat , M. Dolezal , S. Bornschier T. Frey (2008), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization (New York: Cambridge University Press).

R.L. Madrid (2012), The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press).

J. Meltzer (2009), ‘Hugo Chávez and the Search for Post-Neoliberal Policy Alternatives in Venezuela’, in L. Macdonald and A. Ruckert (eds), Post-neoliberalism in the Americas (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan): 89104.

Y. Mény Y. Surel (eds) (2002), Democracies and the Populist Challenge (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

N. Mouzelis (1985), ‘On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities’, Politics & Society, 14(3): 329348.

C. Mudde (2004), ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39(4): 541563.

C. Mudde (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

C. Mudde C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds) (2012), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? (New York: Cambridge University Press).

W. Müller (1999), ‘Plebiscitary Agenda-setting and Party Strategies: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Austria’, Party Politics, 5(3): 303315.

M.F. Plattner (2010), ‘Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 21(1): 8192.

S. Rivera Cusicanqui (2008), ‘Colonialism and Ethnic Resistance in Bolivia: A View from the Coca Markets’, in F. Rosen (ed.), Empire and Dissent. The United States and Latin America (Durham, NC: Duke University Press): 137161.

M. Rooduijn T. Pauwels (2011), ‘Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis’, West European Politics, 34(6): 12721283.

P. Rosanvallon (2008), Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

C. Rovira Kaltwasser (2012), ‘The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy’, Democratization, 19(2): 184208.

E. Silva (2009), Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press).

B. Stanley (2008), ‘The Thin Ideology of Populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1): 95110.

K. Weyland (1996), ‘Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities’, Studies in Comparative and International Development, 31(3): 331.

K. Weyland (2001), ‘Clarifying a Contested Concept. Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics’, Comparative Politics, 34(1): 122.

D. Yashar (2005), Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge (New York: Cambridge University Press).

J.P. Zúquete (2008), ‘The Missionary Politics of Hugo Chávez’, Latin American Politics and Society, 50(1): 91121.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 217
Total number of PDF views: 1774 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2358 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.