Skip to main content
×
Home

Gender Equality Reforms on an Uneven Playing Field: Candidate Selection and Quota Implementation in Electoral Authoritarian Tanzania

Abstract

This article investigates the dynamics that gender quota reforms create within and between government and opposition parties in electoral authoritarian dominant-party states. A dominant-party state regularly holds relatively competitive elections, but the political playing field is skewed in favour of the government party. We investigate the circumstances under which gender quotas’ goal of furthering political gender equality within political parties can be reconciled with parties’ electoral concerns. We address these issues by analysing the implementation of reserved seats by the three largest parties in the dominant-party state of Tanzania. The empirical analysis suggests that the uneven playing field leaves an imprint on the specific priorities parties make when implementing candidate selection reforms. Because of large resource gaps between parties, the ruling party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi – (CCM), is able to reconcile gender equality concerns with power-maximizing partisan strategies to a greater extent than the opposition parties.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Elin Bjarnegård is Associate Professor in the Department of Government at Uppsala University. Contact email: elin.bjarnegard@statsvet.uu.se.

Pär Zetterberg is Associate Professor in the Department of Government at Uppsala University. Contact email: par.zetterberg@statsvet.uu.se.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Baldez L. (2007), ‘Primaries vs. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003’, Latin American Politics and Society, 49(3): 6996.
Bergqvist C., Bjarnegård E. and Zetterberg P. (2015), ‘When Class Trumps Sex: The Social Democratic Intra-Party Struggle over Extending Parental Leave Quotas in Sweden’, Social Politics, published early online, August, doi: 10.1093/sp/jxv017.
Bjarnegård E. (2013), Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).
Bjarnegård E. and Zetterberg P. (2011), ‘Removing Quotas, Maintaining Representation: Overcoming Gender Inequalities in Political Party Recruitment’, Representation, 47(2): 187199.
Bjarnegård E. and Zetterberg P. (2016), ‘Political Parties and Gender Quota Implementation: The Role of Bureaucratized Candidate Selection Procedures’, Comparative Politics, 48(3).
Cheng C. and Tavits M. (2011), ‘Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates’, Political Research Quarterly, 64(2): 460471.
Dahlerup D. (2007), ‘Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result’, Representation, 43(2): 7392.
Diamond L. (2002), ‘Thinking About Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 2135.
Driscoll A. and Krook M.L. (2009), ‘Can There Be a Feminist Rational Choice Institutionalism?’, Politics and Gender, 5(2): 238246.
Fallon K.M., Swiss L. and Viterna J. (2012), ‘Resolving the Democracy Paradox: Democratization and Women’s Legislative Representation in Developing Nations, 1975 to 2009’, American Sociological Review, 77(3): 380408.
Fjelde H. (2010), ‘Generals, Dictators, and Kings: Authoritarian Regimes and Civil Conflict, 1973–2004’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27(3): 195218.
Gandhi J. and Przeworski A. (2006), ‘Cooperation, Cooptation and Rebellion under Dictatorships’, Economics and Politics, 18(1): 126.
Greene K.F. (2008), ‘Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization’, American Journal of Political Science, 52(1): 1631.
Hazan R.Y. and Rahat G. (2010), Democracy within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences (New York: Oxford University Press).
Herbst J. (2001), ‘Political Liberalization in Africa after Ten Years’, Comparative Politics, 33(3): 357375.
Hinojosa M. (2012), Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Hoffman B. and Robinson L. (2009), ‘Tanzania’s Missing Opposition’, Journal of Democracy, 20(4): 123136.
IPU (2011), ‘United Republic of Tanzania, Bunge (National Assembly), Elections in 2010’, Inter-Parliamentary Union PARLINE Database on National Parliaments, www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2337_10.htm.
Kenny M. (2013), Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Killian B. (1996), ‘A Policy of Parliamentary “Special Seats” for Women in Tanzania: Its Effectiveness’, Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies, 24(2–3): 2131.
Krook M.L. (2007), ‘Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis’, European Journal of Political Science, 46(3): 367394.
Krook M.L. (2009), Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide (New York: Oxford University Press).
Levitsky S. and Way L.A. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Mahoney J. and Thelen K. (2010), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Morse Y.L. (2014), ‘Party Matters: The Institutional Origins of Competitive Hegemony in Tanzania’, Democratization, 21(4): 655677.
Murray R. (2007), ‘How Parties Evaluate Compulsory Quotas: A Study of the Implementation of the “Parity” Law in France’, Parliamentary Affairs, 60(4): 568584.
Murray R. (2010), Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Quota Project (2015), ‘Global Database of Quotas for Women’, Quota Project, International IDEA and Stockholm University, www.quotaproject.org.
Reiser M. (2014), ‘The Universe of Group Representation in Germany: Analysing Formal and Informal Party Rules and Quotas in the Process of Candidate Selection’, International Political Science Review, 35(1): 5566.
Schedler A. (2002), ‘The Menu of Manipulation’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 3650.
Schedler A. (2006), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
Tripp A. and Kang A. (2008), ‘The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation’, Comparative Political Studies, 41(3): 338361.
Vandeleene A. (2014), ‘Gender Quotas and “Women-Friendly” Candidate Selection: Evidence from Belgium’, Representation, 50(3): 337349.
Verge T. and de la Fuente M. (2014), ‘Playing with Different Cards: Party Politics, Gender Quotas and Women’s Empowerment’, International Political Science Review, 35(1): 6779.
Yoon M.Y. (2008), ‘Special Seats for Women in the National Legislature: The Case of Tanzania’, Africa Today, 55(1): 6186.
Yoon M.Y. (2013), ‘Special Seats for Women in Parliament and Democratization: The Case of Tanzania’, Women’s Study International Forum, 41: 143149.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 329 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.