1 Hobsbawm, E., Nations and Nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 175.Google Scholar

2 Rosenau, J., Turbulence in World Politics, London, Harvester, 1990, pp. 127–132.Google Scholar

3 Giddens, A., Modernity and Self‐Identity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, p. 187.Google Scholar

4 See Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990 and I. Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism, London, Verso, 1983.Google Scholar

5 See McGrew, A. G., ‘A Global Society?’, in Hall, S., Held, D., McGrew, A. (eds), Modernity and it Futures, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992, p. 74.Google Scholar

6 For a good discussion of regionalization and regionalism, see Buzan, B., People, States and Fear, Brighton, Harvester, 1991, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

7 Held, D., ‘Democracy, the Nation‐state and the Global System’, in Held, D. (ed.), Political Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, p. 202.Google Scholar

8 Ruggie, J. G., ‘Finding our Feet in Territoriality’, Mimeo, 1991, p. 37.Google Scholar

9 But see Held, D., The Foundations of Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press, forthecoming.Google Scholar

10 See Mennel, S., ‘The Globalization of Human Society as a Very Long Term Process: Elias's Theory’, in Featherstone, M. (ed.), Global Culture, London, Sage, 1990.Google Scholar

11 The WEU is a collective defence organization of nine West European states formed in 1948. It is developing a significant military and political role, linking the EC and NATO structures. The CSCE is a grouping of 50 states (all European states in addition to the US and Canada) whose main function is to foster political stability and military security in Europe.

12 Zelikow, P., ‘The New Concert of Europe’, Survival, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 O'Brien, R., The End of Geography, London, Routledge/RIIA, 1992.Google Scholar

14 Gourevitch, P., Politics in Hard Times, New York, Cornell University Press, 1986, p. 33.Google Scholar

15 See Keohane, R., ‘The World Political Economy and the Crisis of Embedded Liberalism’, in Goldthorpe, J. H. (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

16 Frieden, J., ‘Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance’, International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Webb, C., ‘International Economic Structures, Government Interests, and International Co‐ordination of Macro‐economic Adjustment Policies’, International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 320n.Google Scholar

18 Garrett, G., and Lange, P., ‘Political Responses to Interdependence: What's Left for the Left?’, International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 4, p. 543.Google Scholar

19 Gordon, D., ‘The Global Economy’, New Left Review, No. 168, pp. 24–65.Google Scholar

20 Frieden, p. 451, Op. cit.Google Scholar

21 In 1909 there were 37 IGOs and 176 INGOs. In 1989 there were nearly 300 IGOs and 4,624 INGOs.

22 Cf. Burnheim, J., ‘Democracy, the Nation‐state and the World System’, in Held, D. and Pollitt, C. (eds), New Forms of Democracy, London, Sage, 1986;Google Scholar Lewis, R., ‘The G7half Directorate’, Foreign Policy, No. 85, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar

23 Mancini, G., ‘The Making of a Constitution for Europe’, in Keohane, R. and Hoffman, S. (eds), The New European Community, Oxford, Merton Press, 1990, p. 180.Google Scholar

24 Cassese, A., Violence and Law In the Modem Age, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988, pp. 150–1.Google Scholar

25 Capororti, F., ‘Human Rights: The Hard Road Towards Universality’, in Macdonald, R. St J. and Johnson, D. M., (eds), The Structure and Process of International Law, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.Google Scholar

26 See Cassese, 1988, Op. cit.Google Scholar

27 Oppenheim, L., International Law, Vol. 1, London, Longmans, 1905.Google Scholar

28 Mill, J. S., ‘Considerations on Representative Government’, in Acton, H. B. (ed.), Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government, London, Dent, 1951.Google Scholar

29 See, for instance, Dahl, R., A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar

30 See Jessop, B., State Theory, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar

31 See, for example, Schmitter, P., ‘Models of Interest Intermediation and Models of Societal Change in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1.Google Scholar

32 See particularly Keohane, R., After Hegemony, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

33 In particular see Mastanduno, M. et al, ‘Towards a Realist Theory of State Action’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 See Morse, E., Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations, New York, Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar

35 See Brewer, S., Marxist Intones of Imperialism, London, Routledge, 1982.Google Scholar

36 See Wallerstein, I., ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. XVI, No. 4, pp. 381–415.Google Scholar

37 Walker, R., ‘Sovereignty, Identity, Community: Reflections on the Horizons of Contemporary Political Practice’, in Walker, R. and Mendlovitz, S. H. (eds), Contending Sovereignties, London, Lynne Reiner, 1990, pp. 26–7.Google Scholar

38 Significant steps have been taken in this direction recently by Gourevitch, op. cit.; Tilly, C., Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990, Oxford, Blackwell, 1990 Google Scholar; and M. Mann, The Sources of Social Power, Vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986, amongst others. These works have in common a stress on integrating international conditions and processes into an analysis of the modern state. However, while their contribution is highly significant, it is primarily a starting point; for it does not fully engage international relations with political science or political sociology.

39 See Held, D., ‘Democracy: From City‐States to a Cosmopolitan Order?’, Political Studies, Special Issue, 09 1992.Google Scholar