Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T16:00:08.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Do Voters Evaluate Performance in Opposition?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2022

Dieter Stiers Open the ORCID record for Dieter Stiers [Opens in a new window]
Dieter Stiers*
Affiliation:
Centre for Political Science Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. Email: dieter.stiers@kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent scholarship on retrospective voting has shown that when they go to the polls, voters evaluate not only incumbent performance, but also the performance of parties in opposition. So far, however, these studies have not been able to identify how voters evaluate the performance of parties in opposition. The answers to a unique open-ended question included in a Belgian electoral survey in 2019 provide new insights into voters' minds. First, this study investigates what voters think about when they evaluate a party's performance in opposition. Second, it tests whether voters hold opposition parties responsible for the state of affairs in the country. The results show that voters are most concerned with opposition parties' competence in scrutinizing the government and providing constructive criticism, and dislike unconstructive and overly negative opposition. Furthermore, voters hold opposition parties accountable for the state of affairs in their country, albeit to a lesser extent than incumbent parties.

Keywords

retrospective votingopposition partieselectoral accountabilityeconomic votingBelgium
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , October 2023 , pp. 725 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, CJ, Blais, A, Bowler, S, Donovan, T and Listhaug, O (2005) Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, RB (2013) Parties in Parliament: The Blurring of Opposition. In Müller, WC and Narud, HM (eds), Party Governance and Party Democracy. New York: Springer, pp. 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, RB, De Winter, L and Müller, WC (2008) Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Consociational Democracies: Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of Legislative Studies 14(1–2), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330801921034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, S (2006) How Voters Evaluate Economic Competence: A Comparison between Parties In and Out of Power. Political Studies 54(4), 743–766. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.2006.00631.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A, Converse, PE, Miller, WE and Stokes, DE (1960) The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlin, R, Hellwig, T, Love, GJ, Martínez-Gallardo, C and Singer, M (2021) When Does the Public Get It Right? The Information Environment and the Accuracy of Economic Sentiment. Comparative Political Studies 54(9), 1499–1533. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414021989758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, RA (ed.) (1966) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, R, Claes, E and Lewis-Beck, MS (2016) Punishing Local Incumbents for the Local Economy: Economic Voting in the 2012 Belgian Municipal Elections. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 46(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2015.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, K (2012) The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, MP (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fournier, P, Blais, A, Nadeau, R, Gidengil, E and Nevitte, N (2003) Issue Importance and Performance Voting. Political Behavior 25(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022952311518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garritzmann, JL (2017) How Much Power Do Oppositions Have? Comparing the Opportunity Structures of Parliamentary Oppositions in 21 Democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies 23(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1283913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, BT and Wilson, JM (2001) Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution. American Journal of Political Science 45(4), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, A (2016) Economic Voting: A Campaign-Centered Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, L (2008) Studying Parliamentary Opposition in Old and New Democracies: Issues and Perspectives. Journal of Legislative Studies 14(1–2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330801920788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S, Tilley, J and Banducci, S (2013) Clarity of Responsibility: How Government Cohesion Conditions Performance Voting. European Journal of Political Research 52(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02072.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzhacker, R (2002) National Parliamentary Scrutiny Over EU Issues: Comparing the Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties. European Union Politics 3(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, VO (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lefevere, J, Van Aelst, P and Peeters, J (2020) Campaigning Online and Offline: Different Ballgames? Presidentialization, Issue Attention and Negativity in Parties’ Facebook and Newspapers Ads in the 2019 Belgian General Elections. Politics of the Low Countries 2(3), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.5553/PLC/258999292020002003007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, MS and Stegmaier, M (2000) Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3, 183–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A (1968) Typologies of Democratic Systems. Comparative Political Studies 1(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041406800100101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linde, J and Ekman, J (2003) Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research 42(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loxbo, K and Sjölin, M (2017) Parliamentary Opposition on the Wane? The Case of Sweden, 1970–2014. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 52(4), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, K (2010) Divided We Fall: Opposition Fragmentation and the Electoral Fortunes of Governing Parties. British Journal of Political Science 40(2), 419–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000712340999041X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mughan, A and Lacy, D (2002) Economc Performance, Job Insecurity, and Electoral Choice. British Journal of Political Science 32(2), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, RE and Wilson, TD (1977) Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardos-Prado, S and Sagarzazu, I (2016) The Political Conditioning of Subjective Economic Evaluations: The Role of Party Discourse. British Journal of Political Science 46(4), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, M (1984) The Voter as Juror: Attributing Responsibility for Economic Conditions. Political Behavior 6(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilet, J-B (2020) Hard Times for Governing Parties: The 2019 Federal Elections in Belgium. West European Politics 44(2), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1750834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plescia, C and Kritzinger, S (2017) Retrospective Voting and Party Support at Elections: Credit and Blame for Government and Opposition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 27(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2016.1243543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, GB and Whitten, GD (1993) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37(2), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuchamps, M, Baudewyns, P, Dandoy, R, Gallina, M and Niessen, C (2020) From a Green High Tide to Government Participation: The Successes of ECOLO and GROEN in the 2019 Belgian Elections. Environmental Politics 29(2), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1686207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeberg, HB (2013) The Opposition's Policy Influence through Issue Politicisation. Journal of Public Policy 33(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X12000190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeberg, HB (2016) Opposition Policy Influence through Agenda-Setting: The Environment in Denmark, 1993–2009. Scandinavian Political Studies 39(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeberg, HB (2018) The Impact of Opposition Criticism on the Public's Evaluation of Government Competence. Party Politics 26(4), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068818792578.Google Scholar
Shabad, G and Slomczynski, KM (2011) Voters’ Perceptions of Government Performance and Attributions of Responsibility: Electoral Control in Poland. Electoral Studies 30(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, MM (2011) Who Says ‘It's the Economy’? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance. Comparative Political Studies 44(3), 284–312. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414010384371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderlund, P (2008) Retrospective Voting and Electoral Volatility: A Nordic Perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiers, D (2019a) Beyond the Distinction between Incumbency and Opposition: Retrospective Voting on the Level of Political Parties. Party Politics 25(6), 805–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817744201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiers, D (2019b) Retrospective Voting on the Party Level: An Icelandic Test. Scandinavian Political Studies 42(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, DE (1963) Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57(2), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, K (1990) A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 34(2), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, ER (2008) Economic Judgements, Party Choice, and Voter Abstention in Cross-National Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 41(9), 1290–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007308539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavreck, L (2009) The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stiers supplementary material

Appendices A-J

Download Stiers supplementary material(File)
File 388.9 KB