Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Intensity of Government–Opposition Divide as Measured through Legislative Speeches and What We Can Learn from It: Analyses of Japanese Parliamentary Debates, 1953–2013

  • Luigi Curini (a1), Airo Hino (a2) and Atsushi Osaka (a3)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.


Through the analysis of legislative speeches made by prime ministers and party representatives in parliamentary sessions in Japan from 1953 to 2013, we argue that it is possible to place parties according to a dimension that captures their confrontational nature within a parliamentary democracy and its evolution over time. Using this dimension extracted via a well-known scaling algorithm (Wordfish), we develop an index of the intensity of the government–opposition divide that is directly related to the dynamics of the electoral cycle of Japanese politics. We then show how this new index greatly facilitates the investigation of two important aspects of Japanese legislative politics (the survival rate of governments and the speed of passage of cabinet bills) compared to a situation in which we focus on more traditional measures capturing the ideological position of the parties alone.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All

The original version of this article was published with an incorrect author surname. A notice detailing this has been published and the error rectified in the online and print PDF and HTML copies.



Hide All
Bäck, H and Debus, M (2016) Political Parties, Parliaments and Legislative Speechmaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Becker, R and Saalfeld, T (2004) The Life and Times of Bills. In Döring H and Hallerberg M (eds), Patterns of Parliamentary Behaviour. Aldershot: Ashgate: 5790.
Benoit, K and Laver, M (2003) Estimating Irish Party Positions Using Computer Wordscoring: The 2002 Elections. Irish Political Studies 17, 97107.
Blossfeld, H, Golsch, K and Rohwer, G (2007) Event History Analysis with Stata. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Budge, I, Klingemann, H, Volkens, A, Bara, J and Tanenbaum, E (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Catalinac, A (2016) Pork to Policy: The Rise of National Security in Elections in Japan. Journal of Politics 78, 118.
Curini, L and Hino, A (2012) Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter. Journal of Politics 74, 460473.
Curini, L and Zucchini, F (2012) Government Alternation and Legislative Party Unity: The Case of Italy, 1988–2008. West European Politics 35, 826846.
Curtis, GL (1988) The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Curtis, GL (2013) The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dalton, RJ (2008) The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems. Comparative Political Studies 20, 122.
Dewan, T and Spirling, A (2011) Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies. American Political Science Review 105, 337358.
Esaiasson, P and Narud, HM (2014) Between-Election Democracy: The Representative Relationship after Election Day. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Fukumoto, K (2000a) Naikaku Rippou no Shingi Katei no Rekishiteki Bunseki (1947–1998). Koukyou Seisaku (Public Policy),
Fukumoto, K (2000b) Nihon no Kokkai Seiji: Zen Seifu Rippou no Bunseki. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Grimmer, J and Stewart, BM (2013) Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis 21, 267297.
Herzog, A and Benoit, K (2015) The Most Unkindest Cuts: Speaker Selection and Expressed Government Dissent During Economic Crisis. Journal of Politics 77, 11571175.
Hix, S and Jun, H-W (2009) Party Behaviour in the Parliamentary Arena. Party Politics 15, 667694.
Hix, S and Noury, A (2016) Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures. Political Science Research and Methods 4(2), 249273.
Hjorth, F, Klemmensen, R, Hobolt, S, Ejnar Hansen, M and Kurrild-Klitgaard, P (2015) Computers, Coders, and Voters: Comparing Automated Methods for Estimating Party Positions. Research and Politics 2, 19,
Jou, W and Endo, M (2016) Generational Gap in Japanese Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
King, G, Alt, JE, Burns, NE and Laver, M (1990) A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 34(3), 846871.
Krehbiel, K and Peskowitz, Z (2015) Legislative Organization and Ideal-Point Bias. Journal of Theoretical Politics 27, 673703.
Lauderdale, BE and Herzog, A (2016) Measuring Political Positions from Legislative Speech. Political Analysis 24, 374394.
Laver, M (2006) Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Contexts. In Weingast B and Wittman D (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 121138.
Laver, M and Schofield, N (1990) Multiparty Governments: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laver, M, Benoit, K and Garry, J (2003) Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review 97, 311331.
Lowe, W (2015) Austin: Do Things With Words. Version 0.2.2,
Marcus, GE (2000) Emotions in Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 3, 221250.
Martin, LW and Vanberg, G (2008) Coalition Government and Political Communication. Political Research Quarterly 61, 502516.
Masuyama, M (2000) Is the Japanese Diet Consensual? Journal of Legislative Studies 6, 928.
Masuyama, M (2004) Reply to Fukumoto’s Discussion: Time and Influences in Law-making. The Leviathan 35, 160163 (In Japanese).
Masuyama, M (2007) The Survival of Prime Ministers and the House of Councillors. Social Science Japan Journal 10, 8193.
Mayhew, DR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Monroe, BL and Schrodt, PA (2008) Introduction to the Special Issue: The Statistical Analysis of Political Text. Political Analysis 16, 351355.
Polsby, NW (1975) Legislatures. In Greenstein FI and Polsby NW (eds), Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: 257319.
Proksch, S-O and Slapin, JB (2008) A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science 52, 705722.
Proksch, S-O and Slapin, JB (2009) How to Avoid Pitfalls in Statistical Analysis of Political Texts: The Case of Germany. German Politics 18, 323344.
Proksch, S-O and Slapin, JB (2012) Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speeches. American Journal of Political Science 56, 520537.
Proksch, S-O and Slapin, JB (2015) The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proksch, S-O, Slapin, JB and Thies, MF (2011) Party System Dynamics in Post-war Japan: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Electoral Pledges. Electoral Studies 30, 114124.
Saalfeld, T (2008) Institutions, Chance and Choices: The Dynamics of Cabinet Survival. In Muller WC, Bergman T and Strøm K (eds), Comparative Politics: Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 327368.
Sieberer, U (2016) The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels and Representation. West European Politics 39, 903904.
Strøm, K (1990) A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties. American Journal of Political Science 34, 565598.
Taylor, AJ (2014) Bill Passage Speed in the US House: A Test of a Vote Buying Model of the Legislative Process. Journal of Legislative Studies 20, 285304.
Warwick, PV (1994) Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warwick, PV (2011) Voters, Parties, and Declared Government Policy. Comparative Political Studies 44, 16751699.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Luigi et al. supplementary material
Luigi et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (59 KB)
59 KB

The Intensity of Government–Opposition Divide as Measured through Legislative Speeches and What We Can Learn from It: Analyses of Japanese Parliamentary Debates, 1953–2013

  • Luigi Curini (a1), Airo Hino (a2) and Atsushi Osaka (a3)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

A correction has been issued for this article: