Skip to main content Accessibility help

Neo-Statecraft Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Change

  • Toby S. James

This article provides a critical examination of the contribution that statecraft theory, which has been subject to recent revision and development, makes to the literature on institutional change. It articulates an emergent neo-statecraft approach that offers an agent-led form of historical institutionalism. This overcomes the common criticism that historical institutionalists underplay the creative role of actors. The article also argues that the approach brings back into focus the imperatives of electoral politics as a source of institutional change and provides a macro theory of change which is also commonly missing from historical institutionalist work. It can therefore identify previously unnoticed sources of stability and change, especially in states with strong executives and top-down political cultures.

Hide All

Toby S. James is a Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics at the University of East Anglia. Contact email:

Hide All
Adcock, R., Bevir, M. and Stimson, S.C. (2007), ‘Historicizing New Institutionalism’, in R. Adcock, M. Bevir and S.C. Stimson (eds), Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880 (Princeton: Oxford University Press): 259289.
Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1991), ‘Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems’, Journal of Politics, 53: 10441074.
Bertelli, A.M. and John, P. (2013), ‘Public Policy Investment: Risk and Return in British Politics’, British Journal of Political Science, 43(4): 741773.
Bevir, M. (2010), ‘Interpreting Territory and Power’, Government and Opposition, 45(3): 436456.
Blais, A. and Nadeau, R. (1992), ‘The Electoral Budget Cycle’, Public Choice, 74(4): 389403.
Bradbury, J. (2006), ‘Territory and Power Revisited: Theorising Territorial Politics in the United Kingdom after Devolution’, Political Studies, 54: 559582.
Bradbury, J. (2010), ‘Interpreting Political Development and Bringing the Government of the State Back In: Jim Bulpitt’s Territory and Power and the Case of the United Kingdom’, Government and Opposition, 45(3): 318344.
Brenner, N. (2004), ‘Urban Governance and the Production of New State Spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000’, Review of International Political Economy, 11(3): 447488.
Bridges, A.B. (1984), A City in the Republic, Antebellum New York and Origins of Machine Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Buller, J. (1999), ‘A Critical Appraisal of the Statecraft Interpretation’, Public Administration, 77(4): 691712.
Buller, J. (2000), National Statecraft and European Integration (London: Cassell).
Buller, J. and Flinders, M. (2005), ‘The Domestic Origins of Depoliticisation in the Area of British Economic Policy’, British Journal of Politcs and International Relations, 7(4): 526.
Buller, J. and James, T.S. (2012), ‘Statecraft and the Assessment of National Political Leaders: The Case of New Labour and Tony Blair’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14(4): 534555.
Buller, J.James, T.S. (2015), ‘Integrating Structural Context into the Assessment of Political Leadership: Realism, Gordon Brown and the Great Financial Crisis’, Parliamentary Affairs, 68(1).
Bulpitt, J. (1967), Party Politics in English Local Government (London: Longman).
Bulpitt, J. (1986a), ‘The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs. Thatcher’s Domestic Statecraft’, Political Studies, 34(1): 1939.
Bulpitt, J. (1986b), ‘Continuity, Autonomy and Peripherialisation: The Anatomy of the Centre’s Race Statecraft in England’, in Z. Layton-Henry and P. Rich (eds), Race, Government and Politics in Britain (Basingstoke: Macmillan): 1744.
Bulpitt, J. (1988), ‘Rational politicians and Conservative Statecraft in the Open Polity’, in P. Bryd (ed.), British Foreign Policy under Thatcher (Deddington: Philip Allan): 180205.
Bulpitt, J. (1989), ‘Walking back to Happiness? Conservative Party Governments and Elected Local Authorities in the 1980s’, in C. Crouch and D. Marquand (eds), The New Centralism: Britain Out of Step in Europe? (Oxford: Blackwell): 5673.
Bulpitt, J. (1995), ‘Historical Politics: Macro, In-time, Governing Regime Analysis’, in J. Lovenduski and J. Stanyer (eds), Contemporary Political Studies Vol. 2 (Belfast: Political Studies Association): 510520.
Bulpitt, J. (1996), ‘Historical Politics: Leaders, Statecraft and Regime in Britain at the Accession of Elizabeth II’, in I. Hampster-Monk and J. Stayner (eds), Contemporary Political Studies, Vol. 2 (Oxford: Blackwell): 10931106.
Bulpitt, J. (2008), Territory and Power in the United Kingdom (Colchester: ECPR) (first published 1983).
Bulpitt, J. and Burnham, P. (1999), ‘Operation Robot and the British Political Economy in the Early 1950s: The Politics of Market Strategies’, Contemporary British History, 13(1): 131.
Burnham, P. (2001), ‘New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation’, British Journal of Politcs and International Relations, 3(2): 127129.
Capoccia, G. and Keleman, R.D. (2007), ‘The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism’, World Politics, 59: 341369.
Castells, M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age, Economy, Society and Culture (Oxford: Blackwell).
Cowling, M. (1967), 1867 Disraeli, Gladstone and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Cowling, M. (1971), The Impact of Labour 1920–1924 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Cowling, M. (1980), Religion and Public Doctrine in Modern England (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Craig, D.M. (2010), ‘“High Politics” and the “New Political History”’, Historical Journal, 53(2): 453475.
Davies, J.S. (2009), ‘The Limits of Joined-up Government: Towards a Political Analysis’, Public Administration, 87(1): 8096.
Davies, J.S. (2011), ‘The Limits of Post-traditional Public Administration: Towards a Gramscian Perspective’, Critical Policy Studies, 5(1): 4762.
Evans, M. (2006), ‘Elitism’, in C. Hay, M. Lister and D. Marsh (eds), The State: Theories and Issues (Basingstoke: Macmillan): 3958.
Evans, M. and Davies, J. (1999), ‘Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective’, Public Administration, 77(2): 361385.
Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T. (1985) (eds), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Flinders, M. and Buller, J. (2006), ‘Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools’, British Politics, 1(3): 293318.
Greenaway, J., Salter, B. and Hart, S. (2007), ‘How Policy Networks Can Damage Democratic Health: A Case Study in the Government of Governance’, Public Administration, 85(3): 717738.
Hall, P.A. (2010), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist Sociological Perspective’, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelan (eds), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (New York: Cambridge University Press): 204224.
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44(4): 936957.
Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998), ‘Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism’, Politcal Studies, 46: 951957.
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999), Globalisation in Question (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Hopkin, J. and Paolucci, C. (1999), ‘The Business Firm Model of Party Organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy’, European Journal of Political Research, 35(3): 307339.
James, T.S. (2010), ‘Electoral Modernisation or Elite Statecraft? Electoral Administration in the U.K. 1997–2007’, British Politics, 5(2): 179201.
James, T.S. (2011), ‘Only in America? Executive Partisan Interest and the Politics of Election Administration in Ireland, the UK and USA’, Contemporary Politics, 17(3): 219240.
James, T.S. (2012), Elite Statecraft and Election Administration: Bending the Rules of the Game (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (2009), ‘The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement’, Perspectives on Politics, 7(4): 753766.
Katznelson, I. (2003), ‘Periodization and Preferences: Reflections on Purposive Action in Comparative Historical Social Science’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (New York: Cambridge University Press): 270304.
Krasner, S. (1984), ‘Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics’, Comparative Politics, 16(2): 223246.
Krasner, S. (1988), ‘Sovereignty: An Institutionalist’s Perspective’, Comparative Politics, 21: 6694.
Lewis, C.S. (2009), The Magician’s Nephew (New York: Harper Collins) (first published 1955).
Levitsky, S. and Way, L.A. (2002), ‘The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 5165.
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy (London: Yale University Press).
Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2012), ‘Public Administration and Executive Politics: Perennial Questions in Changing Contexts’, Public Policy and Administration, 27(3): 212229.
Lowndes, V. (1996), ‘Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal’, Public Administration, 74(Summer): 181197.
Lowndes, V. and Roberts, M. (2013), Why Institutions Matter (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
Mahoney, J. (2000), ‘Path Dependence in Historical Sociology’, Theory and Society, 29(4): 507548.
Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (2003), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Mahoney, J. and Thelan, K. (2010), ‘A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change’, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelan (eds), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (New York: Cambridge University Press): 137.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984), ‘The New Institutionalism: Organisational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review, 78: 734749.
Marsh, D. (1995), ‘Explaining ‘Thatcherite’ Policies: Beyond Uni-dimensional Explanation’, Political Studies, 43(3): 595613.
Marsh, D. (2008), ‘Understanding British Government: Analysing Competing Models’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(2): 251268.
Marsh, D. (2012), ‘British Politics: A View From Afar’, British Politics, 7(1): 4354.
Marsh, D., Smith, M.J. and Richards, D. (2003), ‘Unequal Plurality: Towards an Asymmetric Power Model of British Politics’, Government and Opposition, 38(3): 306332.
McKenna, D. (2012), ‘Councillor Attitudes towards Participatory Initiatives: A Bulpittian Perspective’, Public Money and Management, 32(2): 103110.
Mendez, C. (2012), ‘Clouds, Clocks and Policy Dynamics: A Path-(inter)dependent Analysis of EU Cohesion Policy’, Policy and Politics, 40(2): 153170.
Norris, P. (2013), ‘The New Research Agenda Studying Electoral Integrity’, Electoral Studies, 32(4): 563575.
Ohmae, K. (1990), The Borderless World (London: Collins).
Parsons, W. (1997), Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis (London: Edward Elgar).
Peters, G. (1999), Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’ (London: Pinter).
Peters, G., Pierre, J. and King, D.S. (2005), ‘The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism’, Journal of Politics, 67(4): 12751300.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1988), Beyond Westminister and Whitehall (London: Unwin Hyman).
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996), ‘The New Governance: Governing without Governance’, Political Studies, 44: 652667.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Governance (Buckingham: Open University Press).
Rhodes, R.A.W. and Tiernan, A. (2013), ‘From Core Executives to Court Politics: From a Bucket of Rice to a Bowl of Jelly’, paper presented at the Political Studies Annual Conference, Cardiff, 25–7 March.
Sanders, E. (2006), ‘Historical Institutionalism’, in R.A.W. Rhodes, S.A. Binder and B.A. Rockman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 3955.
Savage, M. and Williams, K. (2008), ‘Elites: Remembered in Capitalism and Forgotten by Social Sciences’, Sociological Review, 56: 124.
Savigny, H. (2007), ‘Ontology and Epistemology in Political Marketing: Keeping it Real?’, Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2 & 3): 3347.
Savitch, H.V. and Osgood, J.J.L. (2010), ‘Bulpitt in America: Presidential Approaches, Territorial Politics and the Field of Urban Policy’, Government and Opposition, 45(3): 406435.
Sayer, A. (1992), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).
Sayer, A. (2000), Realism and Social Science (London: Sage).
Showronek, S. (1982), Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Stacey, J. (2013), ‘The Statecraft Approach: A Case Study of Nicolas Sarkozy’, French Politics, 11(3): 284306.
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (1992), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Strange, S. (1996), The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Streeck, W. and Thelan, K. (2005), ‘Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelan (eds), Beyond Continuity (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 139.
Weiss, L. (1998), The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed