Skip to main content Accessibility help

Polarization, Partisan Preferences and Strategic Voting

  • Jean-François Daoust (a1) and Damien Bol (a2)

In this article, we study how polarization affects the propensity of supporters of non-viable parties to cast a strategic vote. To do so, we rely on Canadian election panel surveys from the Making Electoral Democracy Work project that were specifically designed to identify strategic voting. We find that the polarization between viable parties increases the probability of a supporter of a non-viable party casting a strategic vote, because it increases how much she likes her favourite viable party, and decreases how much she dislikes her least favourite viable party. Polarization thus increases strategic voting because it alters partisan preferences.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Abramson, P, Aldrich, J, Paolino, P and Rohde, D (1992) ‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries. American Political Science Review 86, 5569.
Alvarez, M and Nagler, J (2000) A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections. British Journal of Political Science 30, 5775.
Alvarez, M, Boehmke, F and Nagler, J (2006) Strategic Voting in British Elections. Electoral Studies 25, 119.
Blais, A and Nadeau, R (1996) Measuring Strategic Voting: A Two-Step Procedure. Electoral Studies 15, 3952.
Blais, A, Nadeau, R, Gidengil, E and Nevitte, N (2001) Measuring Strategic Voting in Multiparty Plurality Elections. Electoral Studies 20(3), 343352.
Blais, A, Young, R and Turcotte, M (2005) Direct or Indirect? Assessing Two Approaches to the Measurement of Strategic Voting. Electoral Studies 24, 163176.
Bol, D, Blais, A and Labbé St-Vincent, S (2018a) Which Matters Most: Party Strategic Entry or Strategic Voting? A Laboratory Experiment. Political Science Research and Methods 6, 229244.
Bol, D, Blais, A and Laslier, J-F (2018b) A Mixed-Utility Theory of Vote Choice Regret. Public Choice 176, 461478.
Broockman, D (2016) Approaches to Studying Policy Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41, 181215.
Burden, BC (2005) Minor Parties and Strategic Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections. Electoral Studies 24, 603618.
Cain, B (1978) Strategic Voting in Britain. American Journal of Political Science 22, 639655.
Cochrane, C (2010) Left/Right Ideology and Canadian Politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43, 583605.
Cox, G (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton, R (2008) The Quantity and Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarisation, its Measurement, and its Consequences. Comparative Political Studies 41, 899920.
Daoust, J-F (2015) Vote Stratégique au Québec: Analyse de l’Election de 2012. Politique et Sociétés 34, 315.
Daoust, J-F and Dassonneville, R (2018) Beyond Nationalism and Regionalism: The Stability of Economic Voting in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 53(1), 553571.
Downs, A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
Duverger, M (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
Eggers, A and Vivyan, N (2018) Who Votes More Strategically? Mimeo, Oxford University.
Gentzkow, M (2016) Polarization in 2016. Mimeo, Stanford University.
Gibbard, A (1973) Manipulation of Voting Schemes. Econometrica 41, 587601.
Gidengil, E, Neville, N, Blais, A, Everitt, J and Fournier, P (2012) Dominance and Decline: Making Sense of Recent Canadian Elections. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Golder, M and Stramski, J (2010) Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54, 90106.
Gschwend, T (2007) Ticket-Splitting and Strategic Voting Under Mixed Electoral Rules: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Research 46, 123.
Heemin, K and Fording, RC (2001) Does Tactical Voting Matter? The Political Impact of Tactical Voting in Recent British Elections. Comparative Political Studies 34, 294311.
Lachat, R (2008) The Impact of Party Polarisation on Ideological Voting. Electoral Studies 27, 687698.
Lanoue, DJ and Bowler, S (1992) The Sources of Tactical Voting in British Parliamentary Elections, 1983–1987. Political Behaviour 14(2), 141157.
Lau, RR and Redlawsk, DP (1997) Voting Correctly. American Political Science Review 91, 585598.
Lenz, G (2012) Follow the Leader: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loewen, P, Hinton, K and Sheffer, L (2015) Beauty Contest and Strategic Voting. Electoral Studies 38, 3845.
Lupu, N (2015) Party Polarisation and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective. Political Behaviour 37, 331356.
Meguid, B (2008) Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merolla, J and Stephenson, L (2007) Strategic Voting in Canada: A Cross Time Analysis. Electoral Studies 26, 235246.
Murr, A (2017) Wisdom of Crowds. In Arzheimer K, Evans J and Lewis-Beck M (eds), The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. London: Sage, pp. 835860.
Niemi, R, Whitten, G and Franklin, M (1992) Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election. British Journal of Political Science 22, 229239.
Pons, V and Tricaud, C (2018) Expressive Voting and its Cost: Evidence from Runoffs with Two or Three Candidates. Econometrica 85, 16211649.
Satterthwaite, M (1975) Strategy-Proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10, 187217.
Sigelman, L and Yough, SN (1978) Left–Right Polarisation in National Party Systems: A Cross-National Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 11, 355379.
Stephenson, L, Blais, A, Bol, D and Kostelka, F (2017) Making Electoral Democracy Work [Aggregate Dataset]. On Harvard Dataverse,
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Daoust and Bol Daoust supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (31 KB)
31 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed