Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:08:39.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power, Politics and the City of London after the Great Financial Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

Sukhdev Johal ,
Michael Moran  and
Karel Williams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four faces of power are summarized, based on the established literature in political science and the work of Foucault: they are power over decision, the power of agenda control, hegemonic power and capillary power. The four faces correspond also to four strategies used by City elites in the UK to protect markets from democratic control. Strategies have developed out of conjunctural crises. The most recent strategy, which involved a form of capillary power, was greatly damaged in the financial crisis of 2007–8. Since then the City has been obliged to retreat to a reliance on the exercise of power over decision, which involves open lobbying.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 49 , Issue 3: The Power of Finance: Before and After the Great Financial Crash , July 2014 , pp. 400 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Sukhdev Johal is Professor of Accounting and Strategy at Queen Mary, University of London. Contact email: s.johal@qmul.ac.uk.

Michael Moran is Emeritus Professor of Government at the University of Manchester Business School. Contact email: michael.moran@manchester.ac.uk.

Karel Williams is Director of the Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change at the University of Manchester. Contact email: karel.williams@manchester.ac.uk.

References

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. (1962), ‘Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review, 56: 947–952.Google Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. (1963), ‘Decisions and Non-decisions: An Analytical Framework’, American Political Science Review, 57: 636–642.Google Scholar
Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. (2014), ‘The Ideational Shaping of State Power and Capacity: Winning Battles but Losing the War over Bank Reform in the US and UK’, Government and Opposition, 49(3): 342–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A., Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., Moran, M. and Williams, K. (2012a), The Finance and Point-Value-Complex, Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, Working Paper 118 (Manchester), www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/the-finance-and-point-value-complex.Google Scholar
Bowman, A., Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., Moran, M. and Williams, K. (2012b), Scapegoats Aren’t Enough: A Leveson for the Banks? Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change Research Briefing (Manchester), www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/scapegoats-arent-enough-a-leveson-for-the-banks.Google Scholar
Curtice, J. and Park, A. (2011), ‘A Tale of Two Crises: Banks, MPs’ Expenses and Public Opinion’, in A. Park, M. Phillips, E. Clery and J. Curtice (eds), British Social Attitudes Survey 2010–2011. Exploring Labour’s Legacy – The 27th Report (London: Sage): 131–154.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1957), ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science, 2: 201–215.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1958), ‘A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model’, American Political Science Review, 52(2): 463–469.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1961), Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Engelen, E., Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., Nilsson, A. and Williams, K. (2011), After the Great Complacence: Financial Crisis and the Politics of Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2005), The Democratisation of Finance? Promises, Outcomes and Conditions (Manchester: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change).Google Scholar
Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2007), ‘The Democratisation of Finance? Promises, Outcomes and Conditions’, Review of International Political Economy, 14(4): 553–575.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2000), One Market under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
Froud, J., Moran, M., Nilsson, A. and Williams, K. (2010), ‘Opportunity Lost: Mystification, Elite Politics and Financial Reform in the UK’, Socialist Register, 47: 98–119.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2009a), UK International Financial Services – The Future. A Report from UK Based Financial Services Leaders to the Government (the Bischoff Report) (London: HM Treasury).Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2009b), Reforming Financial Markets (London: HM Treasury).Google Scholar
HM Treasury Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2013), The Government’s Response to the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (London: HM Treasury/Department for Business Innovation and Skills).Google Scholar
Johal, S., Moran, M. and Williams, K. (2012), ‘The Future Had Been Postponed: The Great Financial Crisis and British Politics’, British Politics, 7(1): 69–81.Google Scholar
Langley, P. (2008), The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974), Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2004), Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
Miller, P. and Rose, N. (2008), Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
Mills, C.W. (1956), The Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Moran, M. (1986), The Politics of Banking (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Moran, M. (1991), The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, M. (2007), The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1990), Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1999), Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press).Google Scholar
Rowe, O. (2012), ‘Banks: Opportunity for Rehabilitation’, YouGov, http://yougov.co.uk/news/2012/10/15/banks-face-opportunity-rehabilitation.Google Scholar
Turner, A. (2009a), ‘How to Tame Global Finance’, Prospect, 162, 27 August.Google Scholar
Turner, A. (2009b), The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis (London: Financial Services Authority).Google Scholar