Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Rethinking Party System Nationalization in India (1952–2014)

  • Arjan H. Schakel and Wilfried Swenden
Abstract

This article provides a new conceptual and empirical analysis of party system nationalization, based on four different measurements. Unlike previous nationalization studies, these measurements conceptualize party system nationalization on the basis of electoral performance in national (general or federal) and sub-national (state) elections. After introducing these measurements we apply them to 16 general and 351 state elections in India, the world’s largest democracy with strong sub-national governments. By incorporating state election results we are able to demonstrate that: (1) the pattern of denationalization in India has been more gradual than assumed in previous studies of party system nationalization; (2) denationalization in recent decades results less from dual voting (vote shifting between state and federal elections) than from the growing divergence among state party systems (in state and federal elections); (3) the 2014 general election result, although potentially transformative in the long run, provides more evidence of continuity than change in the short run.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Arjan H. Schakel is Assistant Professor in Research Methods in the Department of Political Science at the University of Maastricht. Contact email: a.schakel@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Wilfried Swenden is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Edinburgh. Contact email: w.swenden@ed.ac.uk.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Arora, B. (2000), ‘Negotiating Differences: Federal Coalitions and National Cohesion’, in F.R. Frankel, Z. Hasan, R. Bhargava and B. Arora (eds), Transforming India: Social and Political Dynamics of Democracy (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 176207.
Arora, B. and Kailash, K.K. (2012), ‘The New Party System: Federalised and Binodal’, in A. Mehra (ed.), Party System in India: Emerging Trajectories (New Delhi: Lancer Publishers): 235261.
Beck, U. (2002), ‘The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited’, Theory, Culture and Society, 19: 3955.
Bochsler, D. (2010a), ‘The Nationalisation of Post-Communist Party Systems’, Europe–Asia Studies, 62(5): 807827.
Bochsler, D. (2010b), ‘Measuring Party Nationalisation: A New Gini-based Indicator That Corrects for the Number of Units’, Electoral Studies, 29(1): 155168.
Bose, S. (2013), Transforming India: Challenges to the World’s Largest Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Brass, P. (1994), The Politics of India since Independence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Caramani, D (2004), The Nationalization of Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Chhibber, P. and Kollman, K. (2004), The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Chhibber, P. and Ostermann, S.L. (2014), ‘The BJP’s Fragile Mandate: Modi and Vote Mobilizers in the 2014 General Elections’, Studies in Indian Politics, 2(2): 137151.
Chhibber, P., Shastri, S. and Sisson, R. (2004), ‘Federal Arrangements and the Provision of Public Goods in India’, Asian Survey, 44: 339352.
Guha Thakurta, P. and Raghuraman, S. (2007), Divided We Stand: India in Time of Coalitions (New Delhi: Sage).
Golosov, G.V. (2014), ‘Factors of Party System Nationalization’, International Political Science Review, published early online, October, doi: 10.1177/0192512114552864.
Harriss, J. and Wyatt, A. (2013), ‘The Changing Politics of Tamil Nadu’, in Pai, S. (ed.), Handbook of Politics in Indian States: Regions, Parties and Economic Reforms (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 180196.
Hasan, Z. (2012), Congress after Indira: Policy, Power, Political Change (1984–2009) (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A. (2010), The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies (Abingdon: Routledge).
Jaffrelot, C. (2003), India’s Silent Revolution: The Rise of the Lower Castes (New York: Columbia University Press).
Jones, M.P. and Mainwaring, S. (2003), ‘The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas’, Party Politics, 9(2): 139166.
Kailash, K.K. (2011), ‘Federal Calculations in State Level Coalition Governments’, India Review, 10(3): 246282.
Kailash, K.K. (2014a), ‘Regional Parties in the 16th Lok Sabha Elections: Who Survived and Why?’, Economic and Political Weekly, 49(39): 6470.
Kailash, K.K. (2014b), ‘Institutionalizing a Coalitional System and Games within Coalitions in India (1996–2014)’, Studies in Indian Politics, 2(2): 185202.
Kochanek, S. (1976), ‘Mrs Gandhi’s Pyramid’, in H. Hart (ed.), Indira Gandhi’s India (Boulder, CO: Westview Press): 93124.
Kumar, S. (2013), ‘A Shift Towards Regionalization of Indian Politics’, in S. Pai (ed.), Handbook of Politics in Indian States: Regions, Parties and Economic Reforms (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 146166.
Mayer, P. (2013), ‘Gross Violations of Duverger’s Law in India’, Studies in Indian Politics, 1(2): 179201.
Palshikar, S. (2014), ‘The Defeat of the Congress’, Economic and Political Weekly, 49(39): 5763.
Palshikar, S. and Suri, K.C. (2014), ‘India’s Lok Sabha Elections: Critical Shifts in the Long Term, Caution in the Short Term’, Economic and Political Weekly, 49(39): 3949.
Palshikar, S., Suri, K.C. and Yadav, Y. (2014), ‘Introduction: Normalization of the Post-Congress Polity’, in S. Palshikar, K.C. Suri and Y. Yadav (eds), Party Competition in Indian States: Electoral Politics in Post-Congress Polity (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 141.
Schakel, A.H. (2013a), ‘Nationalisation of Multilevel Party Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis’, European Journal of Political Research, 52(2): 212236.
Schakel, A.H. (2013b), ‘Congruence Between Regional and National Elections’, Comparative Political Studies, 46(5): 631662.
Shastri, S. and Syal, R. (2014), ‘Leadership in Context: Impact of Leadership in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections’, Economic and Political Weekly, 49(39): 7781.
Shastri, S., Suri, K.C. and Yadav, Y. (2009), Electoral Politics in Indian States: Lok Sabha Elections in 2004 and Beyond (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Sinha, A. (2004), ‘The Changing Political Economy of Federalism in India’, India Review, 3(1): 2563.
Sridharan, E. (2002), ‘The Fragmentation of the Indian Party System, 1952–1999: Seven Competing Explanations’, in Z. Hasan (ed.), Parties and Party Politics in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 475503.
Sridharan, E. (2010), ‘The Party System’, in N. Gopal Jayal and P. Bhanu Metha (eds), The Oxford Companion to Politics in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 117135.
Sridharan, E. (2012), ‘Why Are Multi-party Minority Governments Viable in India?: Theory and Comparison’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 50(3): 314343.
Sridharan, E. (2014), ‘Behind Modi’s Victory’, Journal of Democracy, 25(4): 2033.
Swenden, W. and Toubeau, S. (2013), ‘Mainstream Parties and Territorial Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy’, in A. Benz and J. Broschek (eds), Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change and the Varieties of Federalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 249273.
Tillin, L. (2013), Remapping India: New States and their Political Origins (London: Hurst).
Yadav, Y. (1999), ‘Electoral Politics in a Time of Change: India’s Third Electoral System’, Economic and Political Weekly’, 21–28 August: 23932399.
Yadav, Y. and Palshikar, S. (2006), ‘Party System and Electoral Politics in the Indian States: From Hegemony to Convergence’, in P.R. deSouza and E. Sridharan (eds), India’s Political Parties (New Delhi: Sage): 73115.
Yadav, Y. and Palshikar, S. (2008), ‘Ten Theses on State Politics in India’, Seminar, 591 (November), www.india-seminar.com/2008/591/591_y_yadav_&_s_palshkar.htm.
Yadav, Y. and Palshikar, S. (2009a), ‘Principal State Level Contests and Derivative National Choices: Electoral Trends in 2004–2009’, Economic and Political Weekly, 7 February: 5562.
Yadav, Y. and Palshikar, S. (2009b), ‘Between Fortuna And Virtu: Explaining The Congress’ Ambiguous Victory in 2009’, Economic and Political Weekly, 44(39): 3346.
Wilkinson, S.I. (2007), ‘Explaining Patterns of Party-voter Linkages in India’, in Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S.I. (eds), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 110140.
Wilkinson, S.I. (2015), ‘Where’s the Party? The Decline of Party Institutionalization and What (if Anything) that Means for Democracy’, Government and Opposition, 50(3): 420445.
Ziegfield, A. (2012), ‘Coalition Politics and Party System Change: Explaining the Rise of Regional Parties in India’, Comparative Politics, 45(1): 6987.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Schakel and Swenden supplementary material
On-line Appendix

 PDF (912 KB)
912 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 60
Total number of PDF views: 238 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 874 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.