Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Supply and Demand Model of Candidate Selection: Some Reflections

  • Joni Lovenduski
Abstract

This contribution takes a look back at the supply and demand model of selection and recruitment, developed by Joni Lovenduski and Pippa Norris in Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament (1995). The core understanding of this model was that candidate selection was an interactive process in which both selectors and aspirants affected outcomes that were organized in several sets of institutions. The model illuminates power in particular institutions – British political parties – and was designed to examine the various effects of the selection process. This contribution reflects on the model and puts forward ideas and arguments about what might be done differently, taking into account the theoretical and methodological innovations of the succeeding generation of scholars who have used the model. It also identifies remaining challenges for research on candidate selection and suggests that the supply and demand model is sufficiently flexible that it can still travel across national, system and party boundaries.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Joni Lovenduski is Anniversary Professor of Politics at Birkbeck College, University of London. Contact email: j.lovenduski@bbk.ac.uk.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ashe, J. (2014), ‘Westminster Guarded’, PhD thesis, Birkbeck, University of London.
Bjarnegård, E. and Kenny, M. (2016), ‘Comparing Candidate Selection: A Feminist Institutionalist Approach’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 370392.
Bjarnegård, E.Kenny, M. and Zetterberg, P. (2016), ‘Gender Equality Reforms on an Uneven Playing Field: Candidate Selection and Quota Implementation in Electoral Authoritarian Tanzania’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 464486.
Dahlerup, D. (1988), ‘From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4): 275298.
Dahlerup, D. (2006), ‘The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass’, Politics and Gender, 2(4): 511522.
FIIN (2015), ‘Feminism and Institutionalism International Network’, www.femfiin.com.
Gallagher, M. and Marsh, M. (1988) (eds), Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics (London: Sage).
Hills, J. (1981), ‘Candidates: The Impact of Gender’, Parliamentary Affairs, 34(2): 221228.
Jensenius, F.R. (2016), ‘Competing Inequalities? On the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity in Candidate Nominations in Indian Elections’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 440463.
Johnson, N. (2016), ‘Keeping Men In, Shutting Women Out: Gender Biases in Candidate Selection Processes in Uruguay’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 393415.
Kenny, M. (2013), Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Kenny, M. and Verge, T. (2016), ‘Opening Up the Black Box: Gender and Candidate Selection in a New Era’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 351369.
Krook, M.L. and Mackay, F. (2011) (eds), Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Lovenduski, J. (1993), ‘Introduction: The Dynamics of Gender and Party’, in J. Lovenduski and P. Norris (eds), Gender and Party Politics (London: Sage): 115.
Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (1989), ‘Selecting Women Candidates: Obstacles to the Feminisation of the House of Commons’, European Journal of Political Research, 17(5): 533562.
Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (1993) (eds), Gender and Party Politics (London: Sage).
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984), ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review, 78(3): 734749.
Mackay, F. and Waylen, G. (2009) (eds), ‘Critical Perspectives on Feminist Institutionalism’, Politics and Gender, 5(2): 237280.
Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (1995), Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Patterson, P. (1966), The Selectorate (London: Macmillan).
Piscopo, J.M. (2016), ‘When Informality Advantages Women: Quota Networks, Electoral Rules and Candidate Selection in Mexico’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 487512.
Randall, V. (1987), Women and Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Ranney, A. (1965), Pathways to Parliament: Candidate Selection in Britain (London: Macmillan).
Rush, M. (1969), The Selection of Parliamentary Candidates (London: Nelson).
Skocpol, T., Evans, P. and Rueschemeyer, D. (1985), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Steinmo, S. (2008), ‘Historical Institutionalism’, in D. Della Porta and M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 118138.
Verge, T. and Espírito-Santo, A. (2016), ‘Interactions between Party and Legislative Quotas: Candidate Selection and Quota Compliance in Portugal and Spain’, Government and Opposition, 51(3): 416439.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed