Skip to main content

The Use and Abuse of Veto Rights in Power-Sharing Systems: Northern Ireland’s Petition of Concern in Comparative Perspective

  • Allison McCulloch

This article assesses the articulation of vital ethno-national interests and the use and abuse of veto rights in deeply divided societies. In consociational theory, veto rights represent the primary means by which ethnic groups defend their ‘vital interests’, though they are often criticized for rewarding extremism and producing institutional instability. Situating a case study of Northern Ireland in a comparative perspective, I consider two lines of veto practice: liberal vs corporate (i.e. who has veto rights?) and permissive vs restrictive (i.e. to what issue areas do vetoes apply?), to assess what political incentives, if any, they offer for moderation and stability. Drawing from a review of the legislative debates when a veto was enacted and on semi-structured interviews with members of the Northern Ireland Assembly, I argue that a permissive approach, in which groups can determine their own vital interests, can contribute to moderation, peace and stability in divided societies.

Hide All

Allison McCulloch is Associate Professor of Political Science at Brandon University. Contact email:

Hide All
AERC (Assembly and Executive Review Committee) (2014), Review of Petitions of Concern, Northern Ireland Assembly.
Bahtić-Kunrath, B. (2011), ‘Of Veto Players and Entity-Voting: Institutional Gridlock in the Bosnian Reform Process’, Nationalities Papers, 39(6): 899923.
BBC (2013), ‘Petitions of Concern: Is Stormont’s Safeguard System being Abused?’, BBC News, 9 July,
Bieber, F. (2005), ‘Power-Sharing After Yugoslavia: Functionality and Dysfunctionality of Power-Sharing Institutions in Post-War Bosnia, Macedonia, and Kosovo’, in S. Noel (ed.), From Power-Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press): 85103.
Conley, R.S. and Dahan, C. (2013), ‘Legislative Behaviour in the Northern Ireland Assembly, 2007–11: Conflict and Consensus in a Developing Consociational Democracy’, Political Studies, 61(S1): 179197.
General Framework Agreement for Peace (1995), 14 December,
Hartzell, C. and Hoddie, M. (2003), ‘Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management’, American Journal of Political Science, 47(2): 318332.
Jarstad, A. (2008), ‘Power-Sharing: Former Enemies in Joint Government’, in A. Jarstad and T. Sisk (eds), From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 105133.
Kelleher, S. (2005), ‘Minority Veto Rights in Power Sharing Systems: Lessons from Macedonia, Northern Ireland and Belgium’, Adalah’s Newsletter, 13.
Koneska, C. (2014), After Ethnic Conflict: Policy-Making in Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Lijphart, A. (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Lijphart, A. (1990), ‘The Power-Sharing Approach’, in J. Montville (ed.), Conflict and Peacemaking in Multiethnic Societies (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).
Lijphart, A. (2008), Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice (London: Routledge).
McCaffrey, R. (2013), ‘Additional Information on Petitions of Concern’, Research and Information Briefing Paper, Northern Ireland Assembly.
McCallister, J. (2015), ‘The Petition of Concern is Not Democracy’, Belfast Telegraph, 25 February.
McCrudden, C., McGarry, J., O’Leary, B. and Schwartz, A. (2016), ‘Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 51(1): 3058.
McCulloch, A. (2014), Power-Sharing and Political Stability in Deeply Divided Societies (London: Routledge).
McEvoy, J. (2013), ‘We Forbid! The Mutual Veto and Power-Sharing Democracy’, in B. O’Leary and J. McEvoy (eds), Power-Sharing in Deeply Divided Places (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press): 253277.
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (2007), ‘Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(4): 670698.
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (2009), ‘Power Shared after the Death of Thousands’, in R. Taylor (ed.), Consociational Theory: McGarry & O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict (London: Routledge): 1584.
Mitchell, P., Evans, G. and O’Leary, B. (2009), ‘Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 57(2): 297421.
Nagle, J. (2015), ‘What are the Consequences of Consociationalism for Sexual Minorities? An Analysis of Liberal and Corporate Consociationalism and Sexual Minorities in Northern Ireland and Lebanon’, paper for the Workshop on Power-Sharing Pacts and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda: Constructive Engagements, Belfast, Queen’s University.
Northern Ireland Office (2015), ‘A Fresh Start: The Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan’, 17 November,
O’Flynn, I. (2010), ‘Deliberative Democracy, the Public Interest, and the Consociational Model’, Political Studies, 58: 572589.
O’Leary, B. (2005), ‘Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments’, in S. Noel (ed.), From Power-Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press): 343.
Ram, M. and Strøm, K.W. (2014), ‘Mutual Veto and Power-Sharing’, International Area Studies Review, 17(4): 343358.
Roeder, P. and Rothchild, D. (2005), ‘Power Sharing as Impediment to Peace and Democracy’, in P. Roeder and D. Rothchild (eds), Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press): 2950.
Schneckener, U. (2002), ‘Making Power-Sharing Work: Lessons from Successes and Failures in Ethnic Conflict Regulation’, Journal of Peace Research, 39(2): 203228.
Schwartz, A. (2014), ‘Petitions of Concern’, Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series, Northern Ireland Assembly.
Schwartz, A. (2015), ‘The Problem with Petitions of Concern’, QPoL, 26 May,
Slugger O’Toole (2015), ‘The Dirtiest Words in Politics’, 19 February,
Taylor, R. (2009), ‘The Promise of Consociational Theory’, in R. Taylor (ed.), Consociational Theory: McGarry & O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict (London: Routledge): 112.
Vandeginste, S. (2015), ‘Arusha at 15: Reflections on Power-Sharing, Peace and Transition in Burundi’, IOB Discussion Paper (University of Antwerp).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed