Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:05:27.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Polyphemus Myth: its Origin and Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Justin Glenn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘The Blinding of the Ogre’, a widespread folktale, has long fascinated and stimulated man's imagination. By far the earliest known version of the story appears in Book 9 of Homer's Odyssey, but the current scholarly consensus holds that this tale is earlier than Homer, was borrowed by the poet, and has survived independently in oral tradition down to modern times. In attempting to explore its origins, I must emphasize at the outset that I am not concerned here with the physical, geographical origin of the story–a problem which has thus far proved insoluble. Rather, my focus will be on the deeper, less tangible origin of the myth: is it possible to discover the idea, the significance, perhaps some symbolism or psychological appeal which lies at the root of the story and might help to explain its astonishing endurance and popularity in oral traditions spanning three continents and three millennia?

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 141 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. See Page, D. L., The Homeric Odyssey (Oxford, 1955), pp. 1–20Google Scholar, and Glenn, J., ‘The Polyphemus Folktale and Homer's Kyklopeia’, TAPhA 102 (1971), 133–81.Google Scholar

2. See Glenn, op. cit. 142.

3. On this subject, see Wüst, E., ‘Odysseus’, RE XVII.2 (1937), col. 1958Google Scholar; Halliday, W. R., Indo-European Folk-Tales and Greek Legend (Cambridge, 1933), pp. 3–5Google Scholar; and especially Buffière, F., Les Mythes d'Homère et la pensée grecque (Paris, 1956), pp. 229, 247–8, 359–62, 615Google Scholar, and also his indices, which comprise a valuable bibliography of the vast field of Homeric allegory in antiquity. Finally, for a nineteenth-century relic of this type of allegory, cf. Taylor, T., Select Works of Porphyry… with an appendix explaining the allegory of the wanderings of Odysseus (London, 1823), esp. pp. 245–6Google Scholar; here he advances with slight modification the view of Porphyry that Polyphemus ‘is no other than the natal demon of Ulysses’.

4. Grimm, W., Abhandlungen der Königl. Akad. der Wiss. zu Berlin, 1857, pp. 1–30Google Scholar; reprinted and more accessible in Grimm, 's Kleinere Schriften, iv (Gütersloh, 1887), 428–62Google Scholar. (My following references are to the latter.)

5. Grimm, , op. cit., p. 459.Google Scholar

6. Ibid., pp. 459–62.

7. See Meyer, L., Bemerkungen zur ältesten Geschichte der griechischen Mythologie (Göttingen, 1857), pp. 70–1Google Scholar. For lengthy references to those who followed the solar interpretation of Polyphemus, cf. Mannhardt, W., Antike Wald- und Feldkulte, ii (Berlin, 1877), 110–11Google Scholar, and Hackman, O., Die Polyphemsage in der Volksüberlieferung (Helsinki, 1904), pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

8. Nitzsch, G. W., Erklärende Anmerkungen zu Homer's Odyssee, iii (Hanover, 1840), p. xxviiGoogle Scholar, which is cited by Krek, G., Einleitung in die slawische Literaturgeschichte (Graz, 1887), p. 755.Google Scholar

9. This was first suggested, to my knowledge, by Bérard, V., Les Phéniciens et l'Odyssée, ii (Paris, 1903), 150–3Google Scholar, and expanded in his later work, Les Navigations d'Ulysse, iv (Paris, 1929), 179–85Google Scholar. Later adherents to this theory were (1) Siret, L., Revue archéologique 16 (1922), 118–28Google Scholar; (2) Hennig, R., Die Geographie des homerischen Epos (Leipzig, 1934), p. 20Google Scholar, and (3) Bonnard, A., Greek Civilization, i (London, 1957), 138.Google Scholar

10. Laistner, L., Nebelsagen (Stuttgart, 1879), p. 272.Google Scholar

11. Campbell, J., The Masks of God: Occidental Mythology (New York, 1964), p. 167Google Scholar; Graves, R., The Greek Myths, ii (Baltimore, 1955), 366.Google Scholar

12. Menrad, J., Der Urmythus der Odyssee (Munich, 1910), pp. 35–7.Google Scholar

13. For Polyphemus and Red Riding Hood, see Cox, G. W., The Mythology of the Aryan Nations, (New York, 1882), pp. 406 and 457, n. 2, respectivelyGoogle Scholar. References to the other figures, including many from Greek mythology, will be found in Dorson, R., ‘The Eclipse of Solar Mythology’, Journal of American Folklore 68 (1955), 406–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Tylor, Edward B., Primitive Culture (London, 1870), pp. 376–85.Google Scholar

15. See e.g. Boltz, A., Die Kyklopen, ein historisches Volk (Berlin, 1885)Google Scholar, passim; Butler, S., The Authoress of the Odyssey (London, 1922), p. 192Google Scholar; and Pocock, L. G., Reality and Allegory in the Odyssey (Amsterdam, 1959), pp. 26–7, 98Google Scholar: all of whom equate the Cyclopes with Sicilian aborigines. Cf. also Krappe, A., The Science of Folklore (London, 1930), p. 17Google Scholar, and Shewan, A., Homeric Essays (Oxford, 1935), pp. 266–7.Google Scholar

16. See Roscher, W., ‘Kyklopen’, Myth. Lex. ii.l (1890–1894), col. 1687.Google Scholar

17. Cf. Schatz, F., Die griechischen Götter und die menschlichen Missgeburten (Wiesbaden, 1901), pp. 9–11Google Scholar, and Th. Zell, , Polyphem ein Gorilla (Berlin, 1901).Google Scholar

18. See Mannhardt, , op. cit. ii. 103–6.Google Scholar

19. Ibid. 106–10.

20. See Roscher, , op. cit., cols. 1686–7.Google Scholar

21. Laistner, L., Das Rätsel der Sphinx, ii (Berlin, 1889), esp. 48–9.Google Scholar

22. Ibid.

23. See e.g. Abraham, K., Dreams and Myths (New York, 1913)Google Scholar, passim, and Freud, S., The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, xii (London, 1958), 180–203Google Scholar

24. See e.g. von der Leyen, F., ‘Traum und Märchen’, in Laiblin, W. (ed.), Märchenforschung und Tiefenpsychologie (Darmstadt, 1969), pp. 1–12Google Scholar; Carpenter, R., Folk Tale, Fiction, and Saga in the Homeric Epics (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1946), p. 69Google Scholar; and Kirk, G. S., Myth: Its Meaning and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures (London, 1971), pp. 268–74.Google Scholar

25. Krappe, , op. cit., pp. 12–13Google Scholar; for his dim view of psychoanalysis, see pp. 14 and 216.

26. See, however, Jones, E., On the Nightmare (London, 1931), pp. 66–8.Google Scholar

27. Laistner, , op. cit. ii.49.Google Scholar

28. Cook, A. B., Zeus: A Study in Ancient Religion, i (Cambridge, 1914), 325–9Google Scholar. The ‘fire-drill’ is a primitive device, essentially a stick and a wooden base, used for starting fires. (It should be noted that in this same volume (i.313) Cook also inclines to the solar explanation for the origin of the Cyclopes.)

29. Cook, , op. cit. i.327.Google Scholar

30. Eitrem, S., ‘Kyklopen’, RE xi.1 (1922), cols. 2344–5.Google Scholar

31. See e.g. Krek, , op. cit., p. 757.Google Scholar

32. Germain, G., Genèse de l'Odyssée (Paris, 1954), pp. 55–129.Google Scholar

33. Germain, , op. cit., p. 86.Google Scholar

34. See Carpenter, , op. cit., pp. 139–42Google Scholar, and Graves, R., op. cit. ii.366.Google Scholar

35. Cf. respectively, Robert, F., Homère (Paris, 1950), pp. 296–301Google Scholar; and Dion, R., Les Anthropophages de l'Odyssée: Cyclopes et Lestrygons (Paris, 1969), pp. 35–50.Google Scholar

36. Rascovsky, A., Revista de psicoanalisis 14 (1957), 347.Google Scholar

37. Wormhoudt, A., The Muse at Length: A Psychoanalytic Study of the Odyssey (Boston, 1953), pp. 72, 84.Google Scholar

38. Róheim, G., The Gates of the Dream (New York, 1952), pp. 361–7.Google Scholar

39. See e.g. Jones, E., Sigmund Freud: His Life and Work, iii (London, 1957), 356–7Google Scholar, and Spock, B., Baby and Child Care (New York, 1968), pp. 363–6, 388–9.Google Scholar

40. Kirk, G. S., op. cit., pp. 172–3, 162–71 (esp. p. 163).Google Scholar

41. Frazer, J. G. (ed. and trans.), Apollodorus, ii (LCL: London, 1921), 455.Google Scholar

42. Rose, H. J., A Handbook of Greek Mythology (New York, 1953), p. 10.Google Scholar

43. See Steele, T. J., CB 48 (1972), 54Google Scholar, which very briefly draws a parallel between Polyphemus and Cronus.

44. See e.g. Freud, S., op. cit. iv (London, 1953), 142–4.Google Scholar

45. See e.g. Freud, S., op. cit. xix (London, 1961), 162Google Scholar and xxiii (London, 1964), 190, n. 1; Ferenczi, S., Contributions to Psychoanalysis (Boston, 1916), p. 210Google Scholar; Bryan, D., International Journal of Psycho-Analysis (1921), 71Google Scholar; and Hollos, S., Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse 9 (1923), 71–5.Google Scholar

46. See Winterstein, A., Imago 6 (1920), 357Google Scholar, and Róheim, G., op. cit., pp. 365–6.Google Scholar

47. Steele, , op. cit. 55.Google Scholar

48. See above, n. 45.

49. Menninger, K., Man Against Himself (New York, 1938), p. 321.Google Scholar

50. Steele, , op. cit. 55.Google Scholar

51. Thompson, S., Motif-Index of Folk Literature, iv (Bloomington, Ind., 1957), 31Google Scholar (motif J 229.12).

52. Ibid. v.232 (motifs Q 451.7.2.1, 451.7.2.2).

53. Ibid. v.232 (motif Q451.7.3).

54. Ibid. v.28 (motif M 13).

55. Ibid. i. 550 (motif C 943).

56. Feldman, T., ‘Gorgo and the Origins of Fear’, Arion 4 (1965), 493–4Google Scholar, n. 10.

57. Feldman, ibid. In addition to the references which Feldman provides on the subject of parental oral/aggressive tendencies toward children, see further Stern, E. S., Journal of Mental Science 94 (1948), 321–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Devereux, G., ‘Why Oedipus Killed Laius’, in Ruitenbeek, H. M. (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Literature (New York, 1964), pp. 168–86Google Scholar; Devereux, G., The Psychoanalytic Forum 1 (1966), 114–30.Google Scholar