Skip to main content

Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems

  • Zeynep Or (a1), Chantal Cases (a2), Melanie Lisac (a3), Karsten Vrangbæk (a4), Ulrika Winblad (a5) and Gwyn Bevan (a6)...

Industrialised countries face similar challenges for improving the performance of their health system. Nevertheless, the nature and intensity of the reforms required are largely determined by each country’s basic social security model. Most reforms in Beveridge-type systems have sought to increase choice and reduce waiting times while those in major Bismarck-type systems have focused on cost control by constraining the choice of providers. This paper looks at the main differences in performance of five countries and reviews their recent reform experience, focusing on three questions: Are there systematic differences in performance of Beveridge and Bismarck-type systems? What are the key parameters of healthcare system, which underlie these differences? Have recent reforms been effective?

Our results do not suggest that one system-type performs consistently better than the other. In part, this may be explained by the heterogeneity in organisational design and governance both within and across these systems. Insufficient attention to those structural differences may explain the limited success of a number of recent reforms. Thus, while countries may share similar problems in terms of improving healthcare performance, adopting a ‘copy-and-paste’ approach to healthcare reform is likely to be ineffective.

Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Zeynep Or, Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics, 10 rue Vauvenargues, 75018, Paris, France. Email:
Hide All
Appleby J., Harrison A.Devlin N. (2003), What is the Real Cost of More Patient Choice?, London, UK: King’s Fund.
Audit Commission and Healthcare Commission (2008), Is the Treatment Working?, London: Audit Commission.
Bevan G. (2008), ‘Is choice working for patients in the English NHS?’, British Medical Journal, 337: a935.
Bevan G. (2009), ‘Have targets done more harm than good in the English NHS?’, British Medical Journal, 338: a3129.
Bevan G.Hood C. (2006), ‘What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system’, Public Administration, 84(3): 517538.
Bevan G.Robinson R. (2005), ‘The interplay between economic and political logics: path dependency in health care in England’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 30: 5378.
Comptroller and Auditor General (2007), Pay Modernisation: A New Contract for NHS Consultants in England [HC 335 2006–2007] . London: The Stationery Office
Comptroller and Auditor General (2008), NHS Pay Modernisation: New Contracts for General Practice Services in England. [HC 307 Session 2007-2008]. London: The Stationery Office. 〈
Coulter A.Magee H. (2003), The European Patient of the Future, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Dixon A., Robertson R., Bal R. (2010), ‘The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 295317.
ESPS (2004), Enquête Santé et Protection sociale, Paris: IRDES.
Eurobarometer (2007), Public Opinion in the European Union, November 2007. Report available on line:
Fredriksson M.Winblad U. (2008), ‘Consequences of a decentralised healthcare governance model: measuring regional authority support for patient choice in Sweden’, Social Science and Medicine, 67: 271279.
Flood C.M., Haugan A. (2010), ‘Lessons for Canada from regulatory approaches to the public/private divide in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and France’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 319341.
Hanning M.Lundström M. (1998), ‘Assessment of the waiting time guarantee for cataract surgery’, Int Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 14(1): 180193.
Hanning M.Winblad Spångberg U. (2000), ‘Maximum waiting time – a treat to clinical freedom? Implementation of a policy to reduce waiting times’, Health Policy, 52: 1532.
NHS Scotland (2003), Partnerships for Care. Scotland’s Health White Paper, Edinburgh: The Stationery Office
National Audit Office (2008), NHS Pay Modernisation: New Contracts for General Practice Services in England, London: The Stationery Office.
OECD (2006), Health Care Quality Indicators Project, Conceptual Framework Paper, by Kelly E. and Hurst J., OECD Health Working Papers, No. 23, Paris.
OECD Health Data (2008), available on CD-ROM, OECD, Paris. Online version at:
Or Z. (2002), From Measures to Action: Improving the Performance of Health Care Systems, A Review of Four Countries, OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 57, 2002.
Propper C., Sutton M., Whitnall C.Windmeijer F. (2008), ‘Did ‘targets and terror’ reduce waiting times in England for hospital care?’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(2, Article 5.
Redaktionsbüro Gesundheit (ed.) (2007), Regionale Hausarztmodelle in Deutschland – Recherche des Redaktionsbüros Gesundheit bei den gesetzlichen Krankenkassen und Kassenärztlichen, Stand: Vereinigungen: Dezember 2007.
Robertson R., Torlby R. (2007), Patient choice, King’s Fund Briefing, January 2008.
Scilliani L., Hurst J. (2003), Explaining Waiting Times Variations for Elective Surgery across OECD Countries, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 7, Paris.
Smith P. C. (2002), ‘Measuring health system performance’, European Journal of Health Economics, 3: 145148.
Socialstyrelsen (2010), Uppföljning av den nationella vårdgarantin och “kömiljarden” [Evaluation of the National Waiting-time guarantee]. Årsrapport 2010. Artikelnummer: 2010-3-12.
Strandberg-Larsen M., Nielsen M. B., Vallgårda S., Krasnik A., Vrangbæk K.Mossialos E. (2007), ‘Denmark: health system review’, Health Systems in Transition, 9(6): 1164.
Trigg N. (2008) Private health market ‘shrinks’. 〈
The Information Centre (2008a), General and Personal Medical Services: England 1997–2007,
The Information Centre (2008b), NHS Hospital and Community Health Services: Medical and Dental staff. England 1997–2007.
The Labour Party (1997), ‘Labour Party Manifesto’, New Labour because Britain deserves better, London: Labour Party.
Tuohy C. (2008), What role for social insurance in tax-financed healthcare systems: a Canadian perspective. Presentation to the King’s Fund, London, April 28, 2008.
Vrangbæk K., Østergren K., Okkels B.Winblad U. (2007), ‘Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark and Sweden’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2: 125152.
Wasem J. (1999), Das Gesundheitswesen in Deutschland: Einstellungen und Erwartungen der Bevölkerung. Wissenschaftliche Analyse und Bewertung einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstudie, Neuss: Eigenverlag Janssen-Cilag.
Welsh Assembly Government (2008), Proposals to Change the Structure of the NHS in Wales. Consultation Paper, Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.>
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Health Economics, Policy and Law
  • ISSN: 1744-1331
  • EISSN: 1744-134X
  • URL: /core/journals/health-economics-policy-and-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 137
Total number of PDF views: 342 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1212 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.