Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Costa-Font, Joan and Zigante, Valentina 2016. The choice agenda in European health systems: the role of middle-class demands. Public Money & Management, Vol. 36, Issue. 6, p. 409.


    Okazaki, Shintaro Castañeda, José Alberto Sanz, Silvia and Mukherji, Prokriti 2016. Physicians’ motivations to use mobile health monitoring: a cross-country comparison. Behaviour & Information Technology, p. 1.


    Stadhouders, Niek Koolman, Xander Tanke, Marit Maarse, Hans and Jeurissen, Patrick 2016. Policy options to contain healthcare costs: a review and classification. Health Policy, Vol. 120, Issue. 5, p. 486.


    Ongaro, Edoardo Ferré, Francesca and Fattore, Giovanni 2015. The fiscal crisis in the health sector: Patterns of cutback management across Europe. Health Policy, Vol. 119, Issue. 7, p. 954.


    Weale, Albert 2015. Reflecting on ‘Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems’. Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 10, Issue. 04, p. 431.


    Sheiman, I. Shishkin, S. and Markelova, H. 2014. Opportunities and limitations of patient choice: the case of the Russian Federation. Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 106.


    Göpffarth, Dirk and Henke, Klaus-Dirk 2013. The German Central Health Fund—Recent developments in health care financing in Germany. Health Policy, Vol. 109, Issue. 3, p. 246.


    Sirven, Nicolas Santos-Eggimann, Brigitte and Spagnoli, Jacques 2012. Comparability of Health Care Responsiveness in Europe. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 105, Issue. 2, p. 255.


    Tenbensel, Tim Eagle, Samantha and Ashton, Toni 2012. Comparing health policy agendas across eleven high income countries: Islands of difference in a sea of similarity. Health Policy, Vol. 106, Issue. 1, p. 29.


    Flood, Colleen M. and Haugan, Amanda 2010. Is Canada odd? A comparison of European and Canadian approaches to choice and regulation of the public/private divide in health care. Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 5, Issue. 03, p. 319.


    Schlesinger, Mark 2010. Choice cuts: parsing policymakers’ pursuit of patient empowerment from an individual perspective. Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 5, Issue. 03, p. 365.


    ×

Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems

  • Zeynep Or (a1), Chantal Cases (a2), Melanie Lisac (a3), Karsten Vrangbæk (a4), Ulrika Winblad (a5) and Gwyn Bevan (a6)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744133110000034
  • Published online: 01 July 2010
Abstract
Abstract

Industrialised countries face similar challenges for improving the performance of their health system. Nevertheless, the nature and intensity of the reforms required are largely determined by each country’s basic social security model. Most reforms in Beveridge-type systems have sought to increase choice and reduce waiting times while those in major Bismarck-type systems have focused on cost control by constraining the choice of providers. This paper looks at the main differences in performance of five countries and reviews their recent reform experience, focusing on three questions: Are there systematic differences in performance of Beveridge and Bismarck-type systems? What are the key parameters of healthcare system, which underlie these differences? Have recent reforms been effective?

Our results do not suggest that one system-type performs consistently better than the other. In part, this may be explained by the heterogeneity in organisational design and governance both within and across these systems. Insufficient attention to those structural differences may explain the limited success of a number of recent reforms. Thus, while countries may share similar problems in terms of improving healthcare performance, adopting a ‘copy-and-paste’ approach to healthcare reform is likely to be ineffective.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Zeynep Or, Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics, 10 rue Vauvenargues, 75018, Paris, France. Email: or@irdes.fr
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. Bevan (2008), ‘Is choice working for patients in the English NHS?’, British Medical Journal, 337: a935.

G. Bevan (2009), ‘Have targets done more harm than good in the English NHS?’, British Medical Journal, 338: a3129.

G. Bevan C. Hood (2006), ‘What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system’, Public Administration, 84(3): 517538.

G. Bevan R. Robinson (2005), ‘The interplay between economic and political logics: path dependency in health care in England’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 30: 5378.

M. Fredriksson U. Winblad (2008), ‘Consequences of a decentralised healthcare governance model: measuring regional authority support for patient choice in Sweden’, Social Science and Medicine, 67: 271279.

M. Hanning U. Winblad Spångberg (2000), ‘Maximum waiting time – a treat to clinical freedom? Implementation of a policy to reduce waiting times’, Health Policy, 52: 1532.

C. Propper , M. Sutton , C. Whitnall F. Windmeijer (2008), ‘Did ‘targets and terror’ reduce waiting times in England for hospital care?’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(2, Article 5. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/vol8/iss2/art5)

P. C. Smith (2002), ‘Measuring health system performance’, European Journal of Health Economics, 3: 145148.

A. Dixon , R. Robertson , R. Bal (2010), ‘The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 295317.

C.M. Flood , A. Haugan (2010), ‘Lessons for Canada from regulatory approaches to the public/private divide in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and France’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 319341.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Health Economics, Policy and Law
  • ISSN: 1744-1331
  • EISSN: 1744-134X
  • URL: /core/journals/health-economics-policy-and-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×