Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Changing choices in health care: implications for equity, efficiency and cost1

  • Gwyn Bevan (a1), Jan-Kees Helderman (a2) and David Wilsford (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Although choice may be seen as an end in itself, the papers included in this special issue of Health Economics, Policy and Law, examine choice policies in European systems of health care, which aim to be effective instruments for ameliorating the systemic pressures from the iron triangle of equity, efficiency, and cost. Three papers consider the nature of differences between and within countries following the Beveridge and Bismarck models of financing and organising the delivery of care, and how choices are changing within different systems. Within countries following the Beveridge model, current policies in England, Denmark and Sweden emphasise increasing patient choice of provider. Within countries following the Bismarck model, current policies in France and Germany seek to restrict choice of specialists by introducing ‘soft’ gatekeeping; and in the Netherlands there is a system of managed competition with choice of insurer that, in principle, allows insurers to contract selectively with providers. A fourth paper considers how government policies that seek to restrict choice within systems of universal coverage have been subject to challenges in the courts. A commentary explores the implications of the fraught and complex nature of choices between insurers and providers of health care for designing effective choice policies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Changing choices in health care: implications for equity, efficiency and cost1
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Changing choices in health care: implications for equity, efficiency and cost1
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Changing choices in health care: implications for equity, efficiency and cost1
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Gwyn Bevan, Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: R.G.Bevan@lse.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

Three of the papers included in this Special Issue of Health, Economics, Policy and Law, on choice in European systems of health care, were presented at a series meetings of the European Health Policy Group (EHPG) between 2006 and 2008 at the Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao in Lisbon, the Bertelsmann Foundation in Berlin, the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin, and the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Gwyn Bevan organised the selection and discussion of papers at these meetings. We are grateful to Carolyn Tuohy for giving an overview of these papers and the editorial, and commenting on each when these were discussed at a meeting focused on this special issue at the LSE in September 2008. In addition, we invited Mark Schlesinger to contribute a commentary and included a fourth paper presented at the EHPG meeting at LSE in September 2009 organised by Adam Oliver. The three editors agreed on papers to be selected for this special issue. David Wilsford prepared a first draft of this editorial to lay out the principal argument. Gwyn Bevan revised this to offer a commentary on the papers included in this special issue, and all three of us contributed to the redrafting.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. Bevan (2008), ‘Is choice working for patients in the English NHS?’, British Medical Journal, 337: a935.

G. Bevan (2009), ‘The search for a proportionate care law by formula funding in the English NHS’, Financial Accountability and Management, 25(1): 391410.

G. Bevan R. Robinson (2005), ‘The interplay between economic and political logics: path dependency in health care in England’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30(1): 5378.

G. Bevan W. P. M. M. van de Ven (2010), ‘Choice of providers and Mutual Healthcare Purchasers: can the English National Health Service learn from the Dutch reforms?’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 343363.

A. Dixon , R. Robertson R. Bal (2010), ‘The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 295317.

A. C. Enthoven (1978), ‘Consumer-Choice Health Plan; a national-health-insurance proposal based on regulated competition in the private sector’, New England Journal of Medicine, 298: 709720.

R. G. Evans (1987), ‘Public health insurance: the collective purchase of individual care’, Health Policy, 7: 115134.

R. G. Evans (2005), ‘Fellow travelers on a contested path: power, purpose, and the evolution of European health care systems’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 30: 277294.

R. G. Evans , M. L. Barer C. Hertzman (1991), ‘The 20-year experiment: accounting for, explaining and evaluating health care cost containment in Canada and the United States’, American Review of Public Health, 12: 481518.

R. G. Evans , J. Lomas , M. L. Barer , R. J. Labelle , C. Fooks , G. L. Stoddart , G. M. Anderson , D. Feeney , A. Gafni , G. W. Torrance W. G. Tholl (1989), ‘Controlling health expenditures – the Canadian reality’, New England Journal of Medicine, 320: 571577.

C. M. Flood A. Haugan (2010), ‘Lessons for Canada from regulatory approaches to the public/private divide in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and France’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 319341.

C. H. Fung , Y.-W. Lim , S. Mattke , C. Damberg P. G. Shekelle (2008), ‘Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 148: 111123.

S. L. Greer (2008), ‘Devolution and divergence in UK health policies’, British Medical Journal, 337: a2616.

C. Ham (1996), ‘Contestability: a middle path for health care’, British Medical Journal, 312: 7071.

J.-K. Helderman , F. T. Schut , T. E. D. van der Grinten W. P. M. M. van de Ven (2005), ‘Market-oriented health care reforms and policy learning in The Netherlands’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 30: 189210.

F. Honigsbaum (1979), The Division in British Medicine: A History of the Separation of General Practice from Hospital Care, 1911–1968, New York: St Martin’s Press.

D. Light (2000), ‘Sociological perspectives on competition in health care’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25(5): 969974.

Z. Or , C. Cases , M. Lisac , K. Vrangbæk , U. Winblad Spångberg G. Bevan (2010), ‘Are health problems systemic? Health reforms under Beveridgian and Bismarkian systems’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 269293.

M. J. Schlesinger (2010), ‘Choice cuts: parsing policymakers’ pursuit of patient empowerment from an individual perspective’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5: 365387.

B. Schwartz (2004), ‘The Tyranny of Choice’, Scientific American, 290(4): 7076.

W. P. M. M. van de Ven , K. Beck , C. van de Voorde , J. Wasem I. Zmora (2007), ‘Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: six years later’, Health Policy, 83: 162179.

A. Weale (1998), ‘Rationing health care: a logical solution to an inconsistent triad’, British Medical Journal, 316: 410.

K. J. Woods (2001), ‘The development of integrated health care models in Scotland’, International Journal of Integrated Care, 1(1): 118.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Health Economics, Policy and Law
  • ISSN: 1744-1331
  • EISSN: 1744-134X
  • URL: /core/journals/health-economics-policy-and-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×