Talati, Zenobia Pettigrew, Simone Dixon, Helen Neal, Bruce Hughes, Clare Shilton, Trevor and Miller, Caroline 2017. Protocol for a Randomized Trial Assessing Consumer Evaluations of Pre-Packaged Foods that Systematically Vary by Nutrition Information and Product Attributes. BMC Nutrition, Vol. 3, Issue. 1,
Helter, Timea Mariann and Boehler, Christian Ernst Heinrich 2016. Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions. Journal of Substance Use, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 662.
Holguín-Veras, José Amaya-Leal, Johanna Cantillo, Victor Van Wassenhove, Luk N. Aros-Vera, Felipe and Jaller, Miguel 2016. Econometric estimation of deprivation cost functions: A contingent valuation experiment. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 45, p. 44.
Jaynes, Jessica Wong, Weng-Kee and Xu, Hongquan 2016. Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies. Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 35, Issue. 15, p. 2543.
Mandeville, Kate L. Ulaya, Godwin Lagarde, Mylène Muula, Adamson S. Dzowela, Titha and Hanson, Kara 2016. The use of specialty training to retain doctors in Malawi: A discrete choice experiment. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 169, p. 109.
Pedersen, Line Bjørnskov Hess, Stephane and Kjær, Trine 2016. Asymmetric information and user orientation in general practice: Exploring the agency relationship in a best–worst scaling study. Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 50, p. 115.
Danyliv, Andriy Pavlova, Milena Gryga, Irena and Groot, Wim 2015. Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 346.
Honda, Ayako and Vio, Ferruccio 2015. Incentives for non-physician health professionals to work in the rural and remote areas of Mozambique—a discrete choice experiment for eliciting job preferences. Human Resources for Health, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,
Krabbe, Paul 2015. Handbook of Measurements.
Laba, Tracey-Lea Essue, Beverley Kimman, Merel and Jan, Stephen 2015. Understanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 5, p. 385.
Mühlbacher, Axel C. Junker, Uwe Juhnke, Christin Stemmler, Edgar Kohlmann, Thomas Leverkus, Friedhelm and Nübling, Matthias 2015. Chronic pain patients’ treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment. The European Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 16, Issue. 6, p. 613.
Oleson, Kirsten L.L. Barnes, Michele Brander, Luke M. Oliver, Thomas A. van Beek, Ingrid Zafindrasilivonona, Bienvenue and van Beukering, Pieter 2015. Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Ecological Economics, Vol. 114, p. 104.
Stafinski, Tania Menon, Devidas Nardelli, Alex Bakal, Jeff Ezekowitz, Justin Tymchak, Wayne Welsh, Robert Gyenes, Gabor and Armstrong, Paul W. 2015. Incorporating patient preferences into clinical trial design: Results of the Opinions of Patients on Treatment Implications of New Studies (OPTIONS) project. American Heart Journal, Vol. 169, Issue. 1, p. 122.
Wilkinson, Grahame and Drummond, Michael 2015. Alternative approaches for assessing the socioeconomic benefits of medical devices: a systematic review. Expert Review of Medical Devices, Vol. 12, Issue. 5, p. 629.
Wittenberg, Eve Bharel, Monica Saada, Adrianna Santiago, Emely Bridges, John F. P. and Weinreb, Linda 2015. Measuring the Preferences of Homeless Women for Cervical Cancer Screening Interventions: Development of a Best–Worst Scaling Survey. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 5, p. 455.
Armatas, Christopher A. Venn, Tyron J. and Watson, Alan E. 2014. Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States. Ecological Economics, Vol. 107, p. 447.
Clark, Michael D. Determann, Domino Petrou, Stavros Moro, Domenico and de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. 2014. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature. PharmacoEconomics, Vol. 32, Issue. 9, p. 883.
Craig, Benjamin M. Reeve, Bryce B. Brown, Paul M. Cella, David Hays, Ron D. Lipscomb, Joseph Simon Pickard, A. and Revicki, Dennis A. 2014. US Valuation of Health Outcomes Measured Using the PROMIS-29. Value in Health, Vol. 17, Issue. 8, p. 846.
De Brun,, A. Flynn, D. Joyce, K. Ternent, L. Price, C. Rodgers, H. Ford, G. A. Lancsar, E. Rudd, M. and Thomson, R. G. 2014. Understanding clinicians' decisions to offer intravenous thrombolytic treatment to patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open, Vol. 4, Issue. 7, p. e005612.
Deal, Ken Keshavjee, Karim Troyan, Sue Kyba, Robert and Holbrook, Anne Marie 2014. Physician and patient willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease management. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 83, Issue. 7, p. 517.
Compared to many applied areas of economics, health economics has a strong tradition in eliciting and using stated preferences (SP) in policy analysis. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are one SP method increasingly used in this area. Literature on DCEs in health and more generally has grown rapidly since the mid-1990s. Applications of DCEs in health have come a long way, but to date few have been ‘best practice’, in part because ‘best practice’ has been somewhat of a moving target. The purpose of this paper is to briefly survey the history of DCEs and the state of current knowledge, identify and discuss knowledge gaps, and suggest potentially fruitful areas for future research to fill such gaps with the aim of moving the application of DCEs in health economics closer to best practice.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.