Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Three worlds of health technology assessment: explaining patterns of diffusion of HTA agencies in Europe

  • Olga Löblová (a1)
Abstract

In the past two decades, setting up independent health technology assessment (HTA) agencies has become a popular tool to inform reimbursement decision-making in health care, spreading from Northern European countries across Western Europe but much less so to post-communist countries. Structural political science explanations leave gaps in clarifying this diffusion pattern. This paper proposes a theoretical model focusing on the influence of domestic epistemic communities mitigating policy diffusion. Based on a review of HTA institutions in the EU, it proposes a chronological taxonomy of HTA agencies in Europe (the forerunners, the mainstreamers and the non-adopters) and asks why there is such an important East-West divide. The paper discusses theoretical explanations from different literatures, finding unsatisfactory many traditional political science answers such as the degree of centralization of a country’s health system, its financial organization (Bismarckian or Beveridgian), the attitude toward independent regulatory bodies in general, the influence of international actors, or lack of resources. Finally, it suggests cases for empirical testing of the domestic epistemic communities model.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: Olga Löblová, School of Public Policy, Central European University, Budapest, Nádor utca 9, 1051 Hungary. Email: olga.loblova@gmail.com, loblova_olga@phd.ceu.edu
References
Hide All
Allen, N., Pichler, F., Wang, T., Patel, S. and Salek, S. (2013), ‘Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems’, Health Policy, 113(3): 305312.
Banta, D. (2003), ‘The development of health technology assessment’, Health Policy, 63: 121132.
Banta, D. and Jonsson, E. (2009), ‘History of HTA: introduction’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 16.
Banta, D. and Oortwijn, W. J. (2009), ‘The Netherlands’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 143147.
Batory, A. (2012), ‘Political cycles and organizational life cycles: delegation to anticorruption agencies in Central Europe’, Governance, 25(4): 639660.
Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B. (2013), Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. University of Michigan Press.
Benson, D. and Jordan, A. (2011), ‘What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited’, Political Studies Review, 9(3): 366378.
Bertelli, A. M. (2008), ‘Credible governance? Transparency, political control, the personal vote and British quangos’, Political Studies, 56(4): 807829.
Böhm, K. and Landwehr, C. (2014), ‘The Europeanization of health care coverage decisions: EU-regulation, policy learning and cooperation in decision-making’, Journal of European Integration, 36(1): 1735.
Brooks, S. (2007), ‘When does diffusion matter? Explaining the spread of structural pension reforms across nations’, Journal of Politics, 69(3): 701715.
Cappellaro, G., Fattore, G. and Torbica, A. (2009), ‘Funding health technologies in decentralized systems: a comparison between Italy and Spain’, Health Policy, 92(2–3): 313321.
Cavazza, M. and Jommi, C. (2012), ‘Stakeholders involvement by HTA Organisations: why is so different?’, Health Policy, 105(2–3): 236245.
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2007), ‘Regulatory agencies – the challenges of balancing agency autonomy and political control’, Governance, 20(3): 499520.
Ciani, O., Tarricone, R. and Torbica, A. (2012), ‘Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?’, Health Policy, 108(2–3): 194202.
Danguole, J (2009), ‘Development of health technology assessment in Lithuania’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 140142.
Daniels, N. and Sabin, J. (1998), ‘The ethics of accountability in managed care reform’, Health Affairs, 17(5): 5064.
DG SANCO (2014), ‘Health technology assessment network’, http://ec.europa.eu/health/technology_assessment/policy/network/index_en.htm [16 June 2014].
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996), ‘Who learns what from whom: a review of the literature on policy transfer’, Political Studies, 44(2): 343357.
Drummond, M. and Sorenson, C. (2009), ‘Nasty or nice? A perspective on the use of health technology assessment in the United Kingdom’, Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12(Supplement 2): S8S13.
Elston, T. (2014), ‘Not so “arm’s length”: reinterpreting agencies in UK central government’, Public Administration, 92(2): 458476.
Espin, J., Rovira, J. and Labry, A. O. de (2011), ‘Working paper 1: external reference pricing’, World Health Organisation and Health Action International.
Freeman, R. (2000), The Politics of Health in Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press. 180 pp.
Garrido, M. V., Kristensen, F. B., Nielsen, C. P. and Busse, R. (2008), Health Technology Policy-Making in Europe: Current Status, Challenges and Potential, Copenhagen: World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Gilardi, F. (2008), Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Bodmin: Manchester Edward Elgar Pub.
Greer, S. L. and Löblová, O. (2016), ‘European integration in the era of permissive dissensus: Neofunctionalism and agenda-setting in European health technology assessment and communicable disease control’, Comparative European Politics (in print).
Goddard, M., Hauck, K. and Smith, P. (2006), ‘Priority setting in health–a political economy perspective’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 1(1): 7990.
Goodman, C. (2004), HTA 101-Introduction to Health Technology Assessment, Volume 6. Falls Church, Virginia: The Lewin Group.
Gulácsi, L., Orlewska, E. and Péntek, M. (2012), ‘Health economics and health technology assessment in Central and Eastern Europe: a dose of reality’, The European Journal of Health Economics HEPAC: Health Economics in Prevention and Care, 13(5): 525531.
Gulácsi, L., Rotar, A. M., Niewada, M., Löblová, O., Petrova, G., Boncz, I. and Klazinga, N. (2014), ‘Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria’, European Journal of Health Economics, 15(Supplement 1): S13S25.
Haas, P. M. (1992), ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization, 46(1): 135.
Immergut, E. M. (1992), Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 374 pp.
Jordana, J. and Levi-Faur, D. (2004), ‘The politics of regulation in the age of governance’, in Jordana, J. and D. Levi-Faur (eds), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 128.
Kolasa, K. and Wasiak, R. (2012), ‘Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(1): 7076.
Kutzin, J., Cashin, C. and Jakab, M. (2010), Implementing Health Financing Reform: Lessons from Countries in Transition, Copenhagen: World Health Organization 2010 on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Löblová, O. (n/a), ‘When epistemic communities fail: exploring the mechanism of policy influence’, unpublished manuscript.
Marsh, D. and Sharman, J (2009), ‘Policy diffusion and policy transfer’, Policy Studies, 30(3): 269288.
Meseguer, C. (2004), ‘What role for learning? The diffusion of privatisation in OECD and Latin American countries’, Journal of Public Policy, 24(3): 299325.
Meseguer, C. (2005), ‘Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1): 6782.
Mittermayer, R., Huić, M. and Meštrović, J. (2014), ‘Zdravstvene djelatnosti i procjena zdravstvenih tehnologija u Hrvatskoj: uloga Agencije za kvalitetu i akreditaciju u zdravstvu’, Acta Medica Croatica, 64(5): 425434.
Mladovsky, P., Srivastava, D., Cylus, J., Karanikolos, M., Evetovits, T., Thomson, S. and McKee, M. (2012), Health Policy Responses to the Financial Crisis in Europe, Copenhagen: World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Moharra, M., Espallargues, M., Kubesch, N., Estrada, M.-D., Parada, A., Vondeling, H. and Raab, M. (2009), ‘Systems to support health technology assessment (HTA) in member states of the European Union with limited institutionalization of HTA’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 2): 7583.
Nacionālais veselības dienests (2012), ‘About NHS’, http://www.vmnvd.gov.lv/en/about-nhs [13 March 2013].
Neumann, P. J. (2009), ‘Lessons for health technology assessment: it is not only about the evidence’, Value in Health, 12(Supplement 2): S45S48.
Nizankowski, R. and Wilk, N. (2009), ‘From idealistic rookies to a regional leader: the history of health technology assessment in Poland’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 156162.
Ozieranski, P., McKee, M. and King, L. (2012), ‘The politics of health technology assessment in Poland’, Health Policy, 108(2–3): 178193.
Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J. and Smullen, A. (2004), Agencies. How Governments do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A. and Talbot, C. (2001), ‘Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 3(3): 271290.
Randma-Liiv, T., Nakrošis, V. and Hajnal, G. (2011), ‘Public sector organization in Central and Eastern Europe: from agencification to de-agencification’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7: 160175.
Robinson, R. (1999), ‘Limits to rationality: economics, economists and priority setting’, Health Policy, 49(1–2): 1326.
Rose, R. (1993), Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space (Public Administration and Public Policy), Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.
Salvador, M. and Ramió, C. (2011), ‘Institutionalizing participatory democracy and the emergence of an epistemic community in Spanish local government’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(5): 491510.
Sampietro-Colom, L., Asua, J., Briones, E. and Gol, J. (2009), ‘History of health technology assessment: Spain’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 163173.
Schmid, A., Cacace, M., Gotze, R. and Rothgang, H. (2010), ‘Explaining health care system change: problem pressure and the emergence of “hybrid” health care systems’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 35(4): 455486.
Sivalal, S. (2009), ‘History of health technology assessment: a commentary’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 285287.
Sorenson, C., Drummond, M. and Kanavos, P. (2008), Ensuring Value for Money in Health Care: The Role of Health Technology Assessment in the European Union. No. 11, WHO Regional Office Europe.
Sorenson, C., Kavanos, P. and Karamalis, M. (2009), ‘HTA in Central and Eastern Europe: current status, challenges and opportunities’, Journal of Medical Device and Regulation, 6: 3445.
Státní úřad pro kontrolu léčiv (2013), ‘01-A-SP-CAU-028 Postup pro Hodnocení Nákladové Efektivity’, http://www.sukl.cz/file/73935 [14 April 2015].
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (2013), ‘Building Capacity for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Romania’, ACIH Update, January–March, Basel. http://www.swisstph.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Pdfs/SCIH/SCIH_Update_Jan-Mar_2013.pdf [6 April 2015].
Thiel, S. V. (2011), ‘Comparing agencification in Central Eastern European and Western European countries: fundamentally alike in unimportant respects?’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7(Special Issue): 1532.
Thomas, C. (1997), ‘Public management as interagency cooperation: testing epistemic community theory at the domestic level’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2): 221246.
Tit, A. (2010), ‘Institutionalising HTA in Slovenia’, Health Policy Monitor, October(16): 14.
Turk, E. and Tit, A. (2008), ‘HTA in Slovenia-new developments’, Health Policy Monitor, April(11): 15.
Verhoest, K., Roness, P., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K. and MacCarthaigh, M. (2010), Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Weyland, K. (2005), ‘Theories of policy diffusion lessons from Latin American pension reform’, World Politics, 57(2): 262295.
Wild, C. and Gibis, B. (2003), ‘Evaluations of health interventions in social insurance-based countries: Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria’, Health Policy, 63(2): 187196.
Wild, C., Patera, N., Stricka, M. and Karnickas, L. (2015), Background Analysis for National HTA Strategy for Lithuania Focus on Medical Devices, Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute.
World Health Organization (2014), ‘Health technology assessment (HTA) in WHO’, http://www.who.int/medical_devices/assessment/history.pdf?ua=1 [9 October 2015].
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Health Economics, Policy and Law
  • ISSN: 1744-1331
  • EISSN: 1744-134X
  • URL: /core/journals/health-economics-policy-and-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed