Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:13:09.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three worlds of health technology assessment: explaining patterns of diffusion of HTA agencies in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2015

Olga Löblová
Olga Löblová*
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
*
*Correspondence to: Olga Löblová, School of Public Policy, Central European University, Budapest, Nádor utca 9, 1051 Hungary. Email: olga.loblova@gmail.com, loblova_olga@phd.ceu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the past two decades, setting up independent health technology assessment (HTA) agencies has become a popular tool to inform reimbursement decision-making in health care, spreading from Northern European countries across Western Europe but much less so to post-communist countries. Structural political science explanations leave gaps in clarifying this diffusion pattern. This paper proposes a theoretical model focusing on the influence of domestic epistemic communities mitigating policy diffusion. Based on a review of HTA institutions in the EU, it proposes a chronological taxonomy of HTA agencies in Europe (the forerunners, the mainstreamers and the non-adopters) and asks why there is such an important East-West divide. The paper discusses theoretical explanations from different literatures, finding unsatisfactory many traditional political science answers such as the degree of centralization of a country’s health system, its financial organization (Bismarckian or Beveridgian), the attitude toward independent regulatory bodies in general, the influence of international actors, or lack of resources. Finally, it suggests cases for empirical testing of the domestic epistemic communities model.

Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 253 - 273
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N., Pichler, F., Wang, T., Patel, S. and Salek, S. (2013), ‘Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems’, Health Policy, 113(3): 305–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banta, D. (2003), ‘The development of health technology assessment’, Health Policy, 63: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banta, D. and Jonsson, E. (2009), ‘History of HTA: introduction’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banta, D. and Oortwijn, W. J. (2009), ‘The Netherlands’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 143–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batory, A. (2012), ‘Political cycles and organizational life cycles: delegation to anticorruption agencies in Central Europe’, Governance, 25(4): 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B. (2013), Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, D. and Jordan, A. (2011), ‘What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited’, Political Studies Review, 9(3): 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, A. M. (2008), ‘Credible governance? Transparency, political control, the personal vote and British quangos’, Political Studies, 56(4): 807–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, K. and Landwehr, C. (2014), ‘The Europeanization of health care coverage decisions: EU-regulation, policy learning and cooperation in decision-making’, Journal of European Integration, 36(1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S. (2007), ‘When does diffusion matter? Explaining the spread of structural pension reforms across nations’, Journal of Politics, 69(3): 701–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappellaro, G., Fattore, G. and Torbica, A. (2009), ‘Funding health technologies in decentralized systems: a comparison between Italy and Spain’, Health Policy, 92(2–3): 313–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavazza, M. and Jommi, C. (2012), ‘Stakeholders involvement by HTA Organisations: why is so different?’, Health Policy, 105(2–3): 236–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2007), ‘Regulatory agencies – the challenges of balancing agency autonomy and political control’, Governance, 20(3): 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciani, O., Tarricone, R. and Torbica, A. (2012), ‘Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?’, Health Policy, 108(2–3): 194–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danguole, J (2009), ‘Development of health technology assessment in Lithuania’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 140–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N. and Sabin, J. (1998), ‘The ethics of accountability in managed care reform’, Health Affairs, 17(5): 50–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DG SANCO (2014), ‘Health technology assessment network’, http://ec.europa.eu/health/technology_assessment/policy/network/index_en.htm [16 June 2014].Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996), ‘Who learns what from whom: a review of the literature on policy transfer’, Political Studies, 44(2): 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, M. and Sorenson, C. (2009), ‘Nasty or nice? A perspective on the use of health technology assessment in the United Kingdom’, Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12(Supplement 2): S8–S13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elston, T. (2014), ‘Not so “arm’s length”: reinterpreting agencies in UK central government’, Public Administration, 92(2): 458–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espin, J., Rovira, J. and Labry, A. O. de (2011), ‘Working paper 1: external reference pricing’, World Health Organisation and Health Action International.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. (2000), The Politics of Health in Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press. 180 pp.Google Scholar
Garrido, M. V., Kristensen, F. B., Nielsen, C. P. and Busse, R. (2008), Health Technology Policy-Making in Europe: Current Status, Challenges and Potential, Copenhagen: World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2008), Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Bodmin: Manchester Edward Elgar Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, S. L. and Löblová, O. (2016), ‘European integration in the era of permissive dissensus: Neofunctionalism and agenda-setting in European health technology assessment and communicable disease control’, Comparative European Politics (in print).Google Scholar
Goddard, M., Hauck, K. and Smith, P. (2006), ‘Priority setting in health–a political economy perspective’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 1(1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, C. (2004), HTA 101-Introduction to Health Technology Assessment, Volume 6. Falls Church, Virginia: The Lewin Group.Google Scholar
Gulácsi, L., Orlewska, E. and Péntek, M. (2012), ‘Health economics and health technology assessment in Central and Eastern Europe: a dose of reality’, The European Journal of Health Economics HEPAC: Health Economics in Prevention and Care, 13(5): 525–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulácsi, L., Rotar, A. M., Niewada, M., Löblová, O., Petrova, G., Boncz, I. and Klazinga, N. (2014), ‘Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria’, European Journal of Health Economics, 15(Supplement 1): S13–S25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, P. M. (1992), ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization, 46(1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, E. M. (1992), Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 374 pp.Google Scholar
Jordana, J. and Levi-Faur, D. (2004), ‘The politics of regulation in the age of governance’, in Jordana, J. and D. Levi-Faur (eds), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolasa, K. and Wasiak, R. (2012), ‘Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(1): 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutzin, J., Cashin, C. and Jakab, M. (2010), Implementing Health Financing Reform: Lessons from Countries in Transition, Copenhagen: World Health Organization 2010 on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google Scholar
Löblová, O. (n/a), ‘When epistemic communities fail: exploring the mechanism of policy influence’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. and Sharman, J (2009), ‘Policy diffusion and policy transfer’, Policy Studies, 30(3): 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, C. (2004), ‘What role for learning? The diffusion of privatisation in OECD and Latin American countries’, Journal of Public Policy, 24(3): 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, C. (2005), ‘Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermayer, R., Huić, M. and Meštrović, J. (2014), ‘Zdravstvene djelatnosti i procjena zdravstvenih tehnologija u Hrvatskoj: uloga Agencije za kvalitetu i akreditaciju u zdravstvu’, Acta Medica Croatica, 64(5): 425–434.Google Scholar
Mladovsky, P., Srivastava, D., Cylus, J., Karanikolos, M., Evetovits, T., Thomson, S. and McKee, M. (2012), Health Policy Responses to the Financial Crisis in Europe, Copenhagen: World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google Scholar
Moharra, M., Espallargues, M., Kubesch, N., Estrada, M.-D., Parada, A., Vondeling, H. and Raab, M. (2009), ‘Systems to support health technology assessment (HTA) in member states of the European Union with limited institutionalization of HTA’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 2): 75–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nacionālais veselības dienests (2012), ‘About NHS’, http://www.vmnvd.gov.lv/en/about-nhs [13 March 2013].Google Scholar
Neumann, P. J. (2009), ‘Lessons for health technology assessment: it is not only about the evidence’, Value in Health, 12(Supplement 2): S45–S48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nizankowski, R. and Wilk, N. (2009), ‘From idealistic rookies to a regional leader: the history of health technology assessment in Poland’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 156–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozieranski, P., McKee, M. and King, L. (2012), ‘The politics of health technology assessment in Poland’, Health Policy, 108(2–3): 178–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J. and Smullen, A. (2004), Agencies. How Governments do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A. and Talbot, C. (2001), ‘Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 3(3): 271–290.Google Scholar
Randma-Liiv, T., Nakrošis, V. and Hajnal, G. (2011), ‘Public sector organization in Central and Eastern Europe: from agencification to de-agencification’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7: 160–175.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1999), ‘Limits to rationality: economics, economists and priority setting’, Health Policy, 49(1–2): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, R. (1993), Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space (Public Administration and Public Policy), Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Salvador, M. and Ramió, C. (2011), ‘Institutionalizing participatory democracy and the emergence of an epistemic community in Spanish local government’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(5): 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampietro-Colom, L., Asua, J., Briones, E. and Gol, J. (2009), ‘History of health technology assessment: Spain’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 163–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, A., Cacace, M., Gotze, R. and Rothgang, H. (2010), ‘Explaining health care system change: problem pressure and the emergence of “hybrid” health care systems’, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 35(4): 455–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sivalal, S. (2009), ‘History of health technology assessment: a commentary’, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(Supplement 1): 285–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorenson, C., Drummond, M. and Kanavos, P. (2008), Ensuring Value for Money in Health Care: The Role of Health Technology Assessment in the European Union. No. 11, WHO Regional Office Europe.Google Scholar
Sorenson, C., Kavanos, P. and Karamalis, M. (2009), ‘HTA in Central and Eastern Europe: current status, challenges and opportunities’, Journal of Medical Device and Regulation, 6: 34–45.Google Scholar
Státní úřad pro kontrolu léčiv (2013), ‘01-A-SP-CAU-028 Postup pro Hodnocení Nákladové Efektivity’, http://www.sukl.cz/file/73935 [14 April 2015].Google Scholar
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (2013), ‘Building Capacity for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Romania’, ACIH Update, January–March, Basel. http://www.swisstph.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Pdfs/SCIH/SCIH_Update_Jan-Mar_2013.pdf [6 April 2015].Google Scholar
Thiel, S. V. (2011), ‘Comparing agencification in Central Eastern European and Western European countries: fundamentally alike in unimportant respects?’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7(Special Issue): 15–32.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. (1997), ‘Public management as interagency cooperation: testing epistemic community theory at the domestic level’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2): 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tit, A. (2010), ‘Institutionalising HTA in Slovenia’, Health Policy Monitor, October(16): 1–4.Google Scholar
Turk, E. and Tit, A. (2008), ‘HTA in Slovenia-new developments’, Health Policy Monitor, April(11): 1–5.Google Scholar
Verhoest, K., Roness, P., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K. and MacCarthaigh, M. (2010), Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. (2005), ‘Theories of policy diffusion lessons from Latin American pension reform’, World Politics, 57(2): 262–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, C. and Gibis, B. (2003), ‘Evaluations of health interventions in social insurance-based countries: Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria’, Health Policy, 63(2): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wild, C., Patera, N., Stricka, M. and Karnickas, L. (2015), Background Analysis for National HTA Strategy for Lithuania Focus on Medical Devices, Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2014), ‘Health technology assessment (HTA) in WHO’, http://www.who.int/medical_devices/assessment/history.pdf?ua=1 [9 October 2015].Google Scholar