Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Spinoza, Kant and the Transition to Hegel’s Subjective Logic: Arguing For and Against Philosophical Systems

  • James Kreines (a1)
Abstract

Hegel’s Logic argues in a manner that is supposed to support a systematic philosophy. But it is difficult to explain how such a systematic argument is supposed to work. For answers, I look to the key transition from the Doctrine of Essence to the Doctrine of the Concept. Here we find discussions of both Spinozist and Kantian systems of philosophy: both are supposed to be helpful, and yet also to be lacking in instructive ways. So the initial hope is that these comparisons can help us to understand Hegel’s own systematic argument, and what it means to transition from an objective to a ‘Subjective Logic’. But the comparisons bring additional difficulties. First, to defend a comprehensive system involves refuting rivals, and the discussion of Spinoza demonstrates that refutation is difficult. Second, it is hard to see how any argument for Hegel’s system could be akin to those in Spinoza and Kant given the extent of the differences between them. I argue that the best way to deal with these difficulties is to explain the systematic argument of the Logic as modelled on the Transcendental Dialectic of Kant’s first Critique.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Ameriks, K. (1990), ‘Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72: 6385.
Gabriel, M. (2016), ‘What Kind of Idealist (if Any) is Hegel?Hegel Bulletin 37:2: 181208.
Bowman, B., Kreines, J., Pinkard, T., Tolley, C. (2017), ‘The Metaphysics of Reason and Hegel’s Logic. A Book Symposium on James Kreines’ Reason in the World. Hegel’s Metaphysics and its Philosophical Appeal ’, Hegel-Studien 50: 129173.
Brandom, R. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Grier, M. (2001), Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1902), Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knappik, F. (2016), ‘And Yet He is a Monist: Comments on James Kreines, Reason in the World ’, Hegel Bulletin 117.
Kreines, J. (2006), ‘Hegel’s Metaphysics: Changing the Debate’, Philosophy Compass 1:5: 466480.
Kreines, J. (2012), ‘Learning from Hegel What Philosophy Is All About: For the Metaphysics of Reason; Against the Priority of Meaning’, Verifiche: Rivista di Scienze Umane 41: 1–3: 129173.
Kreines, J. (2015), Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and its Philosophical Appeal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moyar, D. (2018), ‘Die Lehre vom Begriff. Zweiter Abschnitt. Die Objektivität’, Hegel-Studien Beiheft 67: 555646.
Pippin, R. (1987), ‘Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17: 449476.
Pippin, R. (1989), Hegel’s Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. (1993), ‘Hegel’s Original Insight,’ International Philosophical Quarterly XXXIII:3: 285295.
Proops, I. (2010), ‘Kant’s First Paralogism’, Philosophical Review 119:4: 449495.
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Redding, P. (2016), ‘If Reason is “in the World”, Where Exactly is it Located?European Journal of Philosophy 24:3: 712724.
Rorty, R. (1967), ‘Metaphilosophical Difficulties of Linguistic Philosophy’, in R. Rorty (ed.), The Linguistic Turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spinoza, B. (1994), A Spinoza Reader, trans. E. Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Hegel Bulletin
  • ISSN: 2051-5367
  • EISSN: 2051-5375
  • URL: /core/journals/hegel-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed