Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Extending and Refining the Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: There Is Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory; Nothing as Theoretical as a Good Practice

  • Ronald Bledow (a1), Michael Frese (a1), Neil Anderson (a2), Miriam Erez (a3) and James Farr (a4)...
  • In response to commentaries on:
Extract

We have proposed that a dialectic perspective on innovation may serve well as a first step of an integrative framework for research on innovation and for effective practice. We would like to thank all commentators for their stimulating and challenging ideas and SIOP for enabling this dialog. In keeping with the process view inherent to dialectic thinking, we would like to use this reply to refine and extend the core ideas presented in the focal article by means of integrating explanatory concepts, by critically examining the add-on value of a dialectic perspective, and by pointing out future research needs and ideas for management.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: ronald.bledow@psychol.uni-giessen.de, Address: University of Giessen
References
Hide All
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 11541184.
Bledow, R., Kuehnel, J., Schmitt, A., & Schaupp, K. (2009). Explaining the dynamics of work engagement: An integration of antecedents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
Brown, L. S., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380400.
Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 29, 783792.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). Innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail (Hardcover). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Clegg, C. (2000). Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 463477.
Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Scrull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes (pp. 323–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Connelly, M. S., Gilbert, J. A., Zaccaro, S. J., Threlfall, K. V., Marks, M. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 6586.
Fehr, R. (2009). Why innovation demands aren't as conflicted as they seem: Stochasticism and the creative process. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 344348.
Guidroz, A. M., & Denison, D. R. (2009). What practice needs from science regarding innovation management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 357359.
Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15, 7081.
Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 500528.
King, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations. London: Thomson Learning.
Lewis, M. W., Welsh, M. A., Dehler, G. E., & Green, S. G. (2002). Product development tension: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 546564.
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107120.
Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., & Byrne, C. L. (2009). What is the fundamental? The role of cognition in creativity and innovation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 353356.
Ohly, S., & Binnewies, C. (2009). The ambiguity of creativity and innovation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 360362.
Poole, M. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562578.
Reiter-Palmon, R. (2009). A dialectic perspective on problem identification and construction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 349352.
Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179185.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475494.
Smith, W. K. (2009). A dynamic approach to managing contradictions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 338343.
West, M. A. (2002). Ideas are ten a penny: It's team implementation not idea generation that counts. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 411424.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • ISSN: 1754-9426
  • EISSN: 1754-9434
  • URL: /core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed