Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a Research Program on g in I–O Psychology

  • Charles A. Scherbaum (a1), Harold W. Goldstein (a1), Kenneth P. Yusko (a2), Rachel Ryan (a1) and Paul J. Hanges (a3)...

Abstract

Intelligence (i.e., g, general mental ability) is an individual difference that is arguably more important than ever for success in the constantly changing, ever more complex world of business (Boal, 2004; Gatewood, Field, & Barrick, 2011). Although the field of industrial–organizational (I–O) psychology initially made substantial contributions to the study of intelligence and its use in applied settings (e.g., Hunter, 1980; Schmidt & Hunter, 1981), we have done relatively little in recent times about studying the nature of the intelligence construct and its measurement. Instead, we have focused predominately on using intelligence to predict performance outcomes and examine racial subgroup differences on intelligence test scores. Although the field of I–O psychology continues to approach intelligence at a surface level, other fields (e.g., clinical psychology, developmental and educational research, and neuropsychology) have continued to study this construct with greater depth and have consequently made more substantial progress in understanding this critical and complex construct. The purpose of this article is to note this lack of progress in I–O psychology and to challenge our field to mount new research initiatives on this critical construct.

Copyright

Corresponding author

E-mail: charles.scherbaum@baruch.cuny.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Baruch College, City University of New York, Box B 8-215, One Bernard Baruch Way, New York, NY 10010

References

Hide All
Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: Dynamics of ability determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 598614.
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567589.
Alfonso, V. C., Flanagan, D. P., & Radwan, S. (2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic performance. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 185202). New York, NY: Guilford.
Bartholomew, D. J. (2004). Measuring intelligence: Facts and fallacies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Baum, J. R., Bird, B. J., & Singh, S. (2011). The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64, 397425.
Binet, A., & Henri, V. (1895). La psychologie individuelle. L’Annee Psychologique, 2, 411465.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905/1916). New methods for diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. In The development of intelligence children (E. S. Kite, Trans.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1911/1916). New investigation upon the measure of the intellectual level among school children. In The development of intelligence in children (E. S. Kite, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Boal, K. B. (2004). Strategic leadership. In Goethals, G. R., Sorenson, G. J. & Burns, J. M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 14971504). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists' Press.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work? American Psychologist, 50, 928939.
Cattell, J. M. (1893). Tests of the senses and faculties. Educational Review, 5, 257265.
Cattell, R. B. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373381.
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 122.
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Ceci, S. J., Rosenblum, T., de Bruyn, E., & Lee, D. L. (1997). A bio-ecological model of intellectual development: Moving beyond h2. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Minds in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 74101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, J., & Gardner, H. (2005). Assessment based on multiple-intelligence theory. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 77102). New York, NY: Guilford.
Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Intelligence: A brief history. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Danemann, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422433.
Davidson, J. E., & Downing, C. L. (2000). Contemporary models of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 3449). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
DeNisi, A., Hitt, M. A. & Jackson, S. E. (2003). The knowledge-based approach to sustaining competitive advantage. In Jackson, S. E., Hitt, M. A., & DeNisi, A. S. (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage (pp. 333). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179197.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Fagan, J. F. (2000). A theory of intelligence as processing: Implications for society. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 168179.
Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R. (2002). Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ. Intelligence, 30, 361387.
Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R. (2007). Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing. Intelligence, 35, 319334.
Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fleishman, E. A. (1966). Human abilities and the acquisition of skill. In Bilodeau, E. A. (Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Gatewood, R., Field, H., & Barrick, M. (2011). Human resource selection (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Gatewood, R. D. & Feild, H. S. (2001). Human resource selection (5th ed.) Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York, NY: Wiley.
Goddard, H. H. (1913). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble-mindedness. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Goldstein, H. W., Scherbaum, C. A., & Yusko, K. (2009). Adverse impact and measuring cognitive ability. In Outtz, J. (Ed.) Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes testing (pp. 95134). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Goldstein, H. W., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein, I. L. (2002). g: Is this your final answer? Human Performance, 15, 123142.
Gottfredson, L. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 1323.
Gottfredson, L. (1997b). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79132.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: Not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 2546.
Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135164.
Haier, R. J. (2003). Brain imaging studies of intelligence: Individual differences and neurobiology. In Sternberg, R. J., Lautrey, J., & Lubart, T. I. (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2010). Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 805812.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press.
Higgins, D. M., Peterson, J. B., Pihl, R. O., & Lee, A. G. (2007). Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, big five personality, and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 298319.
Horn, J. L. (1976). Human abilities: A review of research and theory in the early 1970s. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 437485.
Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 4168). New York, NY: Guilford.
Hunter, J. E. (1980). Test validation for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: U.S. Employment Service.
Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitude, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340362.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 7298.
Irvine, S. H., & Kyllonen, P. C. (Eds.). (2002). Item generation and test development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jeanneret, R. (1998). Ethical, legal, and professional issues for individual assessment. In Jeanneret, R. & Silzer, R. (Eds.), Individual psychological assessment: Predicting behavior in organizational settings. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193263.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jensen, A. R. (2000). Testing: The dilemma of group differences. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 6, 121128.
Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 4770.
Kaufman, A. S. (2000). Tests of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 445476). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Kehoe, J. F. (2002). General mental ability and selection in private sector organizations: A commentary. Human Performance, 15, 97106.
Kuhn, T. (1959). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In Taylor, C. (Ed.), The third University of Utah research conference on the identification of scientific talent (pp. 225239). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman's g? In Dennis, I. & Tapsfield, P. (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 4976). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Landy, F. J. (1989). Psychology of work behavior (4th ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology (Monograph), 73, 753777.
Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Situational judgment tests in high stakes settings: Issues and strategies with generating alternate forms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 10431055.
Mayer, R. E. (2000). Intelligence and education. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 519533). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 566570.
McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136182). New York, NY: Guilford.
McGrew, K. S., & Evans, J. (2004). Carroll Human Cognitive Abilities Project: Research Report No. 2. Internal and external factorial extensions to the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities: A review of factor analytic research since Carroll's seminal 1993 treatise. St. Cloud, MN: Institutes of Applied Psychometrics.
McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335354.
Murphy, K., Cronin, B., & Tam, A. (2003). Controversy and consensus regarding the use of cognitive ability testing in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 660671.
Murphy, K. R. (1996). Individual differences and behavior in organizations: Much more than g. In Murphy, K. R. (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 330). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Naglieri, J. A. (2005). The cognitive assessment system. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 441460). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Intelligence revised. In Dillon, R. (Ed.), Handbook on testing (pp. 136163). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2005). Planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) theory: A revision of the concept of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 120135). New York, NY: Guilford.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77101.
Offermann, L. R., & Gowing, M. K. (1993). Personnel selection in the future: The impact of changing demographics and the nature of work. In Schmitt, N. & Borman, W. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 385417). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Outtz, J. L., & Newman, D. A. (2009). A theory of adverse impact. In Outtz, J. (Ed.), Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes testing (pp. 5393). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Pearlman, K., & Barney, M. F. (2000). Selection for a changing workplace. In Kehoe, J. F. (Ed.), Managing selection in changing organizations: Human resource strategies (pp. 372). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Prabhakaran, V., Narayanan, K., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 8590.
Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., & Borman, W. C. (2003). Hiring for knowledge-based competition. In Jackson, S. E., Hitt, M. A., & DeNisi, A. S. (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage (pp. 155177). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2002). g2K. Human Performance, 15, 324.
Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2007). Tests of cognitive ability. In Whetzel, D. L. & Wheaton, G. R. (Eds.), Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management (pp. 131159). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Erlbaum.
Ree, M. J., Carretta, T. R., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518524.
Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g.Personnel Psychology, 44, 321332.
Reeve, C. L., & Hakel, M. D. (2002). Asking the right questions about g. Human Performance, 15, 4774.
Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302318.
Schmidt, F. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187210.
Schmidt, F. (2011). An interview with Frank Schmidt. The Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 48, 2129.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1981). Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 11281137.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262274.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
Spearman, C. E. (1904). “General intelligence” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201293.
Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and non-entrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 116.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Plume.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292316.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321350.
Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tenopyr, M. L. (2002). Theory versus reality: Evaluation of g in the workplace. Human Performance, 15, 107122.
Thorndike, R. M. (1959). Personnel selection. New York, NY: Wiley.
Thorndike, R. M. (1997). The early history of intelligence testing. In Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth edition. Guide for administering and scoring. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vernon, P. A., Wickett, J. C., Bazana, P. G., & Stelmack, R. M. (2000). The neuropsychology and psychophysiology of human intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 245266). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. (2002). Agreements and disagreements on the role of general mental ability (GMA) in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Human Performance, 15, 212231.
Wagner, J., & Hollenbeck, J. (1998). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage. Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wasserman, J. D., & Tulsky, D. S. (2005). A history of intelligence assessment. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 322). New York, NY: Guilford.
Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30, 135139.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Revised Tests of Achievement: Standard and supplemental batteries. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Zu, J., & Weiss, L. (2005). The Wechsler scales. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 297324). New York, NY: Guilford.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • ISSN: 1754-9426
  • EISSN: 1754-9434
  • URL: /core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed