Skip to main content
×
Home

Learning Agility: Many Questions, a Few Answers, and a Path Forward

  • D. Scott DeRue (a1), Susan J. Ashford (a1) and Christopher G. Myers (a1)
Abstract

This article responds to and extends the commentaries offered in response to our focal article on learning agility. After summarizing the basic themes in the commentaries, we use this response to clarify points that were unclear in our original article and push back on certain points raised in a few of the responses. In particular, we reframe the rigor–relevance debate from an “either–or” to a “both–and” discussion, clarify the relationship between learning agility and ability to learn, explain how learning agility in organizations moves beyond cognition, and describe how exchanges such as the one we have collectively engaged in here are central to progressing the scientific study on learning agility and its effective use in practice.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: dsderue@umich.edu, Address: Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
References
Hide All
Argyris C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69, 99109.
Arun N., Coyle P. T., & Hauenstein N. (2012). Learning agility: Still searching for clarity on a confounded construct. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 290293.
Baron R. M., & Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.
Beck J. W. (2012). Does learning agility vary primarily at the between- or within-person level of analysis? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 312315.
Block J. (1995). A common view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187215.
Blume B. D., Ford J. K., Baldwin T. T., & Huang J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 10651105.
Carette B., & Anseel F. (2012). Epistemic motivation is what gets the learner started. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 306309.
De Meuse K. P., Dai G., Swisher V. V., Eichinger R. W., & Lombardo M. M. (2012). Leadership development: Exploring, clarifying, and expanding our understanding of learning agility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 280286.
DeRue D. S., Ashford S. J., & Myers C. G. (2012). Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 258279.
DeRue D. S., Nahrgang J. D., Wellman N., & Humphrey S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 752.
DeRue D. S., & Wellman N. (2009). Developing leaders via experience: The role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 859875.
Gulati R. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor–relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 775782.
Hezlett S. A., & Kuncel N. R. (2012). Prioritizing the learning agility research agenda. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 296301.
Johnson R. E., & Scott B. A. (2012). Learning agility requires proper action identification. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 309312.
Kelley E. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Oxford, UK: World Book Company.
Kolb D. (1974). Organizational psychology: An experiential approach. Englewood, CO: Prentice-Hall.
Lombardo M. M., & Eichinger R. W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39, 321329.
Macey W. H., & Schneider B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 330.
Marsh H. W. (1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of the jingle–jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 365380.
Mitchinson A., Gerard N. M., Roloff K. S., & Burke W. W. (2012). Learning agility: Spanning the rigor–relevance divide. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 287290.
Schaie K. W. (1994). The course of adult intellectual development. American Psychologist, 49, 304313.
Vandewalle D. (2012). A growth and fixed mindset exposition of the value of conceptual clarity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 301305.
Wang S., & Beier M. E. (2012). Learning agility: Not much is new. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 293296.
Woodrow H. (1946). The ability to learn. Psychological Review, 53, 147158.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • ISSN: 1754-9426
  • EISSN: 1754-9434
  • URL: /core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 55 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 115 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.