Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Performance Management: Embracing Complexity, Evading Reductionism, and Moving to Outcome-Based Approaches

  • Shonna D. Waters (a1), Wayne A. Baughman (a1) and David W. Dorsey (a1)
Extract

Adler et al. (2016) open with a summary of the business case driving our field to change and close by providing principles for accomplishing that change, where they conclude that “there is no right answer to the ratings question” (p. 244). Lying between the opening and closing sections is a series of arguments for and against today's performance rating status quo, arguments illustrating just what happens when too many years are spent seeking answers along too narrow a path. In this commentary, we provide additional support for the strategy- and outcome-driven approach to performance management advocated in the article. In addition, we offer ideas for what has contributed to getting us and keeping us where we are. Unless we understand what has driven performance ratings research and practice to be the object of an intense and lengthy debate, these same forces may well drive us to carry out years-long experiments of questionable value along similarly narrow paths. We want to offer our views on how to foster outcome-based practice more broadly.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shonna D. Waters, 2022 North Taylor Street, Arlington, VA 22207. E-mail: shonna.d.waters@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 219252.
Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177, 393396.
Brooks, F. P. (1975). The mythical man-month (Vol. 1995). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gertner, J. (2012). The idea factory: Bell Labs and the great age of American innovation. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
Meyer, H. H., Kay, E., & French, J. P. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1965/01/split-roles-in-performance-appraisal/ar/1
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Persley, N., Baughman, W. A., Morath, R., Holt, R., & Maher, M. A. (1994, July). Defining developmental environments: Curriculum design strategies promoting positive reactions to demanding courses. Poster session presented at the 6th annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
Rosen, L. (1974, April). A proposal for a developmental environment. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED093391)
Stone, D., & Heen, S. (2015). Thanks for the feedback. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Whitworth, L. (2007). Co-active coaching: New skills for coaching people toward success in work and life. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • ISSN: 1754-9426
  • EISSN: 1754-9434
  • URL: /core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed