Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:37:39.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Putting Evidence in Its Place: A Means Not an End

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Wayne A. Baughman*
Affiliation:
National Security Agency
David W. Dorsey
Affiliation:
National Security Agency
David Zarefsky
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
E-mail: wbaughman@cox.net, Address: 3804 Pleasant Ridge Road, Annandale, VA 22003

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 322.Google Scholar
Goodnight, G. T. (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument. Journal of the American Forensics Association, 18, 214227. Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Floris. Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D. (2009). What does an argument culture look like? Informal Logic, 29, 296308. Google Scholar