Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Zu lieben und zu arbeiten: Was Freud right all along?

  • Jeffrey M. Cucina (a1), Theodore L. Hayes (a2) and Philip T. Walmsley (a3)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: jcucina@gmail.com

Footnotes

Hide All

All authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Federal Government, or any agency of the U.S. Federal Government.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 478494.
Barlow, D. H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J. R., Bullis, J. R., & Ellard, K. K. (2014). The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 344365. doi: 10.1177/2167702613505532
Bremner, J. D., Narayan, M., Anderson, E. R., Staib, L. H., Miller, H. L., & Charney, D. S. (2000). Hippocampal volume reduction in major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 115118. doi: 10.1176/ajp.157.1.115
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., … Wu, H., (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 637644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
Carter, N. T., Dalal, D. K., Boyce, A. S., O’Connell, M. S., Kung, M. C., & Delgado, K. M. (2014). Uncovering curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and job performance: How theoretically appropriate measurement makes an empirical difference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 564586. 10.1037/a0034688
Carter, N. T., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Extreme personalities at work and in life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 429436. doi: 10.1177/0963721418793134
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957
Elms, A. C. (2001). Apocryphal Freud: Sigmund Freud’s most famous “quotations” and their actual sources. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 29, 83104.
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. Oxford, UK: Kegan Paul.
Feinstein, S. B., Fallon, B. A., Petkova, E., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2003). Item-by-item factor analysis of the Yale–Brown obsessive compulsive scale symptom checklist. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 15(2), 187193. doi: 10.1176/jnp.15.2.187
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Fleischmann, R. L., Hill, C. L., … Charney, D. S. (1989a). The Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46(11), 10061011. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Delgado, P., Heninger, G. R., & Charney, D. S. (1989b). The Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale II. Validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46(11), 10121016. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008
Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
International OCD Foundation. (2016). Adapted version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Boston, MA: Author. Retrieved from https://iocdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/04-Y-BOCS-w-Checklist.pdf.
Lahey, B. B., Krueger, R. F., Rathouz, P. J., Waldman, I. D., & Zald, D. H. (2017). A hierarchical causal taxonomy of psychopathology across the lifespan. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 142186. doi: 10.1037/bul0000069
LaHuis, D. M., Martin, N. R. and Avis, J. M. (2005). Investigating nonlinear conscientiousness—job performance relations for clerical employees. Human Performance, 18, 199212. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_1
Le, H., Oh, I., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113133. doi: 10.1037/a0021016
Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 10701084. doi: 10.1037/pas0000004
Melson-Silimon, A., Harris, A. M., Shoenfelt, E. L., Miller, J. D., & Carter, N. T. (2019). Personality testing and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Cause for concern as normal and abnormal personality models are integrated. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(2), 119132.
Nickel, L. B., Roberts, B. W., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2019). No evidence of a curvilinear relation between conscientiousness and relationship, work, and health outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 296312. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000176
Omura, K., Constable, R. T., & Canli, T. (2005). Amygdala gray matter concentration is associated with extraversion and neuroticism. Neuroreport, 16, 19051908. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000186596.64458.76
Pelphrey, K. A., & Morris, J. P. (2006). Brain mechanisms for interpreting the actions of others from biological-motion cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 136140. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00423.x
Putka, D. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2012). Reliability and validity. In Farr, J. L. and Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 949). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rauch, S. L., Milad, M. R., Orr, S. P., Quinn, B. T., Fischl, B., & Pitman, R. K. (2005). Orbitofrontal thickness, retention of fear extinction, and extraversion. Neuroreport, 16, 19091912. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000186599.66243.50
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117141. doi: 10.1037/bul0000088
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 125. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Robie, C., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(3), 157169. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00115
Schmidt, F. L., & Oh, I.-S. (2016). The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: Is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else? Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4, 3237. doi: 10.1037/arc0000029
Walmsley, P. T., Sackett, P. R., & Nichols, S. B. (2018). A large sample investigation of the presence of nonlinear personality-job performance relationships. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26, 145163. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12223
Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372376. doi: 10.1037/h0026244
Whetzel, D. L., McDaniel, M. A., Yost, A. P., & Kim, N. (2010). Linearity of personality-performance relationships: A large-scale examination. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(3), 310320. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00514.x
Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411417. doi: 10.1177/1745691617751884

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed