Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-dfw9g Total loading time: 0.502 Render date: 2022-08-14T15:20:09.380Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Failure to Implement Respiratory Isolation: Why Does it Happen?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kentaro Iwata
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
Barbara A. Smith
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
Eloisa Santos
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
Bruce Polsky
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
Emilia M. Sordillo*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
*
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1111 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10025

Abstract

Background:

Respiratory isolation for 90% of individuals with acid-fast bacillus (AFB)-smear–positive tuberculosis (TB) is a recommended performance indicator in recent Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. However, compliance with respiratory isolation reported from multiple centers in the United States and Europe falls short of that goal.

Objective:

To identify missed clues in TB patients who are not appropriately isolated.

Design:

Retrospective survey.

Setting:

A 900-bed voluntary hospital.

Patients:

All patients with AFB-smear–positive TB admitted between January 1995 and December 1999 who were not appropriately isolated.

Results:

There were 173 TB cases admitted, including 106 with pulmonary TB. AFB smears were positive in 82 cases; 24 (29%) of these were not appropriately isolated. During the study period, the number of TB cases declined, but the proportion of appropriately isolated patients did not change. Most isolation failure cases were men (median age, 45.5 years); 21 of these patients were black, 2 were Hispanic white, and 1 was Asian, but none was non-Hispanic white. All isolation failure cases had at least one characteristic predictive of TB that could have been elicited at admission (eg, abnormal chest radiograph findings consistent with TB, fever, weight loss, a history of TB, a positive result on tuberculin skin test, hemoptysis, and human immunodeficiency virus infection).

Conclusion:

Consistent with experiences at other hospitals, we found that the rate of isolation failure remained unchanged despite an overall decline in TB cases. In our experience, almost all isolation failures could be avoided by careful review of the history, physical examination, and chest radiograph for characteristics classically considered predictive of TB. (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:595-599).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pearson, ML, Jereb, JA, Frieden, TR, et alNosocomial transmission of multi-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a risk to patients and health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis at a hospital: New York City, 1991. MMWR 1993;42:427434.Google Scholar
3.Center for Disease Control. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among HIV-infected persons: Florida and New York, 1988-1991. MMWR 1991;40:585591.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Edlin, BR, Tokars, JI, Grieco, MH, et alAn outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1992;326:15141521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Coronado, VG, Beck-Sague, CM, Hutton, MD, et alTransmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection in an urban hospital: epidemiologic and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Infect Dis 1993;168:10521055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Busillo, CP, Lessnau, KD, Sanjana, V, et alMultidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Chest 1992;102:797801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Center for Disease Control. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in health-care settings, with special focus on HIV-related issues. MMWR 1990;39(RR-17):129.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Center for Disease Control. Screening for tuberculosis and tuberculous infection in high-risk populations: recommendations of the Advisory Committee for Elimination of Tuberculosis. MMWR 1990; 39(RR-8):17.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities, 1994. MMWR 1994;43(RR-13):1132.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Kenyon, TA, Ridzon, R, Luskin-Hawk, R, et alA nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:3236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Nivin, B, Nicholas, P, Gayer, M, Frieden, TR, Fujiwara, PI. A continuing outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, with transmission in a hospital nursery. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:303307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Horsburgh, CR Jr, Feldman, S, Ridzon, R. Practice guidelines for the treatment of tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:633639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Wisnivesky, JP, Kaplan, J, Henschke, C, McGinn, TG, Crystal, RG. Evaluation of clinical parameters to predict Mycobacterium tuberculosis in inpatients. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:24712476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Knirsch, CA, Jain, NL, Pablos-Mendez, A, Friedman, C, Hripcsak, G. Respiratory isolation of tuberculosis patients using clinical guidelines and an automated clinical decision support system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:94100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Tattevin, P, Casalino, E, Fleury, L, Egmann, G, Ruel, M, Bouvet, E. The validity of medical history, classic symptoms, and chest radiographs in predicting pulmonary tuberculosis: derivation of a pulmonary tuberculosis prediction model. Chest 1999;115:12481253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.White, AH, Khatib, R, Riederer, KM, Flood, M. Respiratory isolation in a teaching hospital with low-to-moderate rate of tuberculosis: compliance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for identifying patients who may have active tuberculosis. Am J Infect Control 1997; 25:467470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Moran, GJ, McCabe, F, Morgan, MT, Talan, DA. Delayed recognition and infection control for tuberculosis patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:290295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Tokars, JI, McKinley, GF, Otten, J, et alUse and efficacy of TB infection control practices at hospitals with previous outbreaks of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:449455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Blumberg, HM, Watkins, DL, Berschling, JD, et alPreventing the nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:658663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Bock, NN, McGowan, JE Jr, Ahn, J, Tapia, J, Blumberg, HM. Clinical predictors of tuberculosis as a guide for a respiratory isolation policy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:14681472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Roy, MC, Fredrickson, M, Good, NL, Hunter, SA, Nettleman, MD. Correlation between frequency of tuberculosis and compliance with control strategies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:2831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Pitchenik, AE, Rubinson, HA. Radiographic appearance of tuberculosis in patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and pre-AIDS. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1985;131:393396.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Selwyn, PA, Hartel, D, Lewis, VA, et alA prospective study of the risk of tuberculosis and intravenous drug users with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1989;320:545550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Craft, DW, Jones, MC, Blanchet, CN, Hopfer, RL. Value of examining three acid-fast bacillus sputum smears for removal of patients suspected of having tuberculosis from the “Airborne Precautions” category. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:42854287.Google Scholar
25.Nelson, SM, Deike, MA, Cartwright, CP. Value of examining multiple sputum specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:467469.Google Scholar
26.Warren, JR, Battacharya, M, De Almeida, KN, Trakas, K, Peterson, LR. A minimum 5.0 ml of sputum improves the sensitivity of acid-fast smear for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:15591562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Di Perri, G, Cruciani, M, Danzi, MC, et alNosocomial epidemic of active tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients. Lancet 1989;2:15021504.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Fenelly, KP, Nardell, EA. The relative efficacy of respirators and room ventilation in preventing occupational tuberculosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:754759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Failure to Implement Respiratory Isolation: Why Does it Happen?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Failure to Implement Respiratory Isolation: Why Does it Happen?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Failure to Implement Respiratory Isolation: Why Does it Happen?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *