Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-nx7b4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T09:33:36.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The life cycle of infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship projects and interventions: the dynamic interplay of implementation and de-implementation science (Part I of II)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2025

Westyn Branch-Elliman*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA Center for Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
David A. Chambers
Affiliation:
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
Owen Albin
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Lynne Batshon
Affiliation:
Director of Policy and Practice, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Arlington, VA, USA
Sandra Castejon-Ramirez
Affiliation:
St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng
Affiliation:
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
Nkechi Emetuche
Affiliation:
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Arlington, VA, USA
Rupak Datta
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System and Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Mini Kamboj
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Professor of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
Sarah L. Krein
Affiliation:
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Milner Staub
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Director Adult Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Director, Antimicrobial Stewardship, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
Samira Reyes Dassum
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
Barry Rittmann
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems, Richmond, VA, USA
Felicia Scaggs Huang
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Pranavi Sreeramoju
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, USA
Stephanie Stroever
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Education and Division of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
Geehan Suleyman
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA School of Medicine, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI, USA School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
Joseph Y. Ting
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Lucy S. Witt
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Matthew J. Ziegler
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Jennie H. Kwon
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
*
Corresponding author: Westyn Branch-Elliman; Email: wbranchelliman@mednet.ucla.edu

Abstract

In Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention and Control, programmatic goals often strive to achieve clinical benefit by practice change in the direction of doing less. Practically, this may include reducing the number of tests ordered, encouraging shorter and more narrow courses of antimicrobials, or discontinuing practices that are no longer contextually appropriate. Because promoting practice change in the direction of doing less is a critical aspect of day-to-day operations in Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention and Control, the goals of this Society for Healthcare Epidemiology Research Committee White Paper are to provide a roadmap and framework for leveraging principles of implementation and de-implementation science in day-to-day practice. Part II of this series focuses on some practical case studies, including real-world examples of applied de-implementation science to promote discontinuation of practices that are ineffective, overused, or no longer effective.

Information

Type
SHEA White Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brown, CH, Curran, G, Palinkas, LA, et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Ann Rev Publ Health 2017;38:122.doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deenik, J, Czosnek, L, Teasdale, SB, et al. From impact factors to real impact: translating evidence on lifestyle interventions into routine mental health care. Transl Behav Med, 2020;10(4):10701073. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownson, RC, Colditz, GA, Proctor, EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.Google Scholar
Pinnock, H, Barwick, M, Carpenter, CR, et al. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ 2017;356:i6795. Published 2017 Mar 6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, WE, Chambers, DA. Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions. Implement Sci 2020;15:2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Augustsson, H, Ingvarsson, S, Nilsen, P, et al. Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci Commun 2021;2(1):13. Published 2021 Feb 4. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00110-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, SD, Truog, RD, Miller, FG. Cognitive bias and public health policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020;324:337338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eva, WV, van Dulmen, SA, Westert, GP, Hooft, L, Heus, P, Kool, RB. Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands? BMJ Open Qual 2022;11:e001710.Google Scholar
Branch-Elliman, W, Dassum, SR, Stroever, S, et al. Leveraging deimplementation science to promote infection prevention and stewardship: a roadmap and practical examples (Part II of II). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2025. doi: 10.1017/ice.2025.76.Google Scholar
Proctor, E, Silmere, H, Raghavan, R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011;38(2):6576. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W, Elwy, AR, Chambers, DA. Embracing dynamic public health policy impacts in infectious diseases responses: leveraging implementation science to improve practice. Front Publ Health 2023;11:1207679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusaczyk, B, Swindle, T, Curran, G. Defining and conceptualizing outcomes for de-implementation: key distinctions from implementation outcomes. Implement Sci Commun 2020;1:43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W, Gupta, K, Rani Elwy, A. Factors influencing uptake of evidence-based antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines for electrophysiology procedures. Am J Infect Control 2020;48:668674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, NM, Johnston, B, Jansen, J. A qualitative interview study of Australian physicians on defensive practice and low value care: “it’s easier to talk about our fear of lawyers than to talk about our fear of looking bad in front of each other”. BMC Med Ethics 2022;23:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, A, Sirota, M, Juanchich, M, Orbell, S. Action bias in the public’s clinically inappropriate expectations for antibiotics. J Exp Psychol Appl 2020;26(3):422431. doi: 10.1037/xap0000269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, S, Reji, D. Lay, professional, and artificial intelligence perspectives on risky medical decisions and COVID-19: How does the number of lives matter in clinical trials framed as gains versus losses? Q J Exp Psychol 2022;75:784795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemel, E, Paraschiv, C. Deciding about human lives: an experimental measure of risk attitudes under prospect theory. Soc Choice Welfare 2018;51:163192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, P. Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. In Implementation Science 3.0; 2020: 5379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livorsi, DJ, Drainoni, ML, Reisinger, HS, et al. Leveraging implementation science to advance antibiotic stewardship practice and research. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43(2):139146. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
University of Washington. Pick a theory, model, and/or framework; 2024. https://impsciuw.org/implementation-science/research/frameworks/. Accessed March 12, 2024.Google Scholar
Moore, JE. Implementing the knowledge to action model to pick change strategies; 2018. https://thecenterforimplementation.com/toolbox/knowledge-to-action-model. Accessed March 12, 2024.Google Scholar
White, MC, Daya, L, Karel, FKB, et al. Using the knowledge to action framework to describe a nationwide implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in Cameroon. Anesth Analg 2020;130(5):14251434. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, B, Booth, A, Ilott, I, Gerrish, K. Using the Knowledge to Action Framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implement Sci 2014;9:172. Published 2014 Nov 23. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0172-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damschroder, LJ, Aron, DC, Keith, RE, Kirsh, SR, Alexander, JA, Lowery, JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50. Published 2009 Aug 7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damschroder, LJ, Reardon, CM, Widerquist, MAO, Lowery, J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci 2022;17(1):75. Published 2022 Oct 29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, MA, Kelley, C, Yankey, N, Birken, SA, Abadie, B, Damschroder, L. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci 2016;11:72. Published 2016 May 17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; 2024. https://cfirguide.org/. Accessed March 12, 2024.Google Scholar
Mark, C, Yan, AP, Robinson, PD, et al. Healthcare professional perspectives following implementation of an infection management care pathway for pediatric patients with cancer: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2024;32(7):405. Published 2024 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08612-1.Google ScholarPubMed
Ward, MJ, Matheny, ME, Rubenstein, MD, et al. Determinants of appropriate antibiotic and NSAID prescribing in unscheduled outpatient settings in the Veterans health administration. BMC Health Serv Res 2024;24(1):640. Published 2024 May 18. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11082-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, G, Kitson, A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci 2016;11:33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W, Lamkin, R, Shin, M, et al. Promoting de-implementation of inappropriate antimicrobial use in cardiac device procedures by expanding audit and feedback: protocol for hybrid III type effectiveness/implementation quasi-experimental study. Implement Sci 2022;17(1):12. Published 2022 Jan 29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01186-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RE-AIM: Improving Public Health Relevance and Population Health Impact; 2024. https://re-aim.org/. Accessed March 12, 2024.Google Scholar
Walsh-Bailey, C, Tsai, E, Tabak, RG, et al. A scoping review of de-implementation frameworks and models. Implement Sci 2021;16(1):100. Published 2021 Nov 24. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01173-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, P, Ingvarsson, S, Hasson, H, von Thiele Schwarz, U, Augustsson, H. Theories, models, and frameworks for de-implementation of low-value care: a scoping review of the literature. Implement Res Pract 2020;1:2633489520953762. Published 2020 Sep 18. doi: 10.1177/2633489520953762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De-Implementing Testing and Treating of Urine Cultures in Asymptomatic Patients; 2024.Google Scholar
Gupta, K, Trautner, BW. The 2019 USPSTF report on screening for asymptomatic Bacteriuria—Lessons from history. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1912522–e1912522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helfrich, CD, Rose, AJ, Hartmann, CW, et al. How the dual process model of human cognition can inform efforts to de-implement ineffective and harmful clinical practices: A preliminary model of unlearning and substitution. J Eval Clin Pract 2018;24(1):198205. doi: 10.1111/jep.12855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diekema, DJ, Nori, P, Stevens, MP, Smith, MW, Coffey, KC, Morgan, DJ. Are contact precautions “essential” for the prevention of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus? Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78(5):12891294. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curran, GM, Bauer, M, Mittman, B, Pyne, JM, Stetler, C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care 2012;50(3):217226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W. De-implementation of inappropriate antimicrobial use after Cardiac Device Procedures (CIED) [NCT05020418]; 2023. Clinicaltrials.gov.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D, Tversky, A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I. World Scientific; 2013;99127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, N, Böckenholt, U. A meta-analysis of loss aversion in product choice. J Retail 2014;90:182197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, JS and Krieger, H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Mak 2015;35:539557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, DA, Feero, WG and Khoury, MJ. Convergence of implementation science, precision medicine, and the learning health care system: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA 2016;315:19411942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helfrich, CD. Viewing De-Implementation as a Feature of a Learning Health Care System. Academy Health; 2020.Google Scholar
Powell, BJ, Fernandez, ME, Williams, NJ, et al. Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda. Front Public Health. 2019;7:3. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proctor, EK, Powell, BJ, McMillen, JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci 2013;8:139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, BJ, Waltz, TJ, Chinman, MJ, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 2015;10:21. Published 2015 Feb 12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodrich, DE, Miake-Lye, I, Braganza, MZ, Wawrin, N, Kilbourne, AM. The QUERI Roadmap for Implementation and Quality Improvement. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2020.Google Scholar
Waltz, TJ, Powell, BJ, Fernández, ME, Abadie, B, Damschroder, LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci 2019;14(1):42. Published 2019 Apr 29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yakovchenko, V, Lamorte, C, Chinman, MJ, et al. Comparing the CFIR-ERIC matching tool recommendations to real-world strategy effectiveness data: a mixed-methods study in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci 2023;18(1):49. Published 2023 Oct 12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01307-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, MH, Montano, AL, Adjognon, OL, Harvey, KLL, Solimeo, SL, Sullivan, JL. Identification of implementation strategies using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool to mitigate barriers in a primary care model for older veterans. Gerontologist 2023;63(3):439450. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool. https://cfirguide.org/choosing-strategies/. Accessed April 12, 2024.Google Scholar
Leeman, J, Birken, SA, Powell, BJ, Rohweder, C, Shea, CM. Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci 2017;12(1):125. Published 2017 Nov 3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kien, C, Daxenbichler, J, Titscher, V, et al. Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci 2024;19(1):56. Published 2024 Aug 5. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittington, MD, Ho, PM and Helfrich, CD. Recommendations for the use of audit and feedback to de-implement low-value care. Am J Med Qual, 2019;34:409411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadiem. Checklists and the Hierarchy of Effectiveness, 2021. https://canadiem.org/checklists-and-the-hierarchy-of-effectiveness/ Google Scholar
Powell, BJ, Beidas, RS, Lewis, CC, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res 2017;44(2):177194. doi: 10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderwood, MS, Anderson, DJ Bratzler, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023;44(5):695720. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberger, LH, Politano, AD, Sawyer, RG. The surgical care improvement project and prevention of post-operative infection, including surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2011;12:163168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W. A roadmap for reducing cardiac device infections: a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and actionable risk factors to guide the development of an infection prevention program for the electrophysiology laboratory. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2017;19:34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed