Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-l69ms Total loading time: 0.255 Render date: 2022-08-08T05:05:26.736Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

A Randomized Crossover Study of Disposable Thermometers for Prevention of Clostridium difficile and Other Nosocomial Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John A. Jernigan
Affiliation:
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Yardena Siegman-Igra
Affiliation:
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Richard C. Guerrant
Affiliation:
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
Barry M. Farr*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
*
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Box 473, Charlottesville, VA 22908

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To test the hypothesis that use of disposable thermometers would result in lower rates of nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhea and of total nosocomial infections, compared with electronic thermometers.

DESIGN:

Prospective randomized crossover trial.

SETTING:

A 700-bed university hospital providing primary and tertiary care.

PATIENTS:

All patients admitted to a group of 20 inpatient nursing units.

INTERVENTIONS:

20 nursing units were randomized into two groups. One group randomly was assigned exclusive use of single-use disposable thermometers for patient temperature measurement, and the other group was assigned exclusive use of electronic thermometers. After 6 months, the assignments were reversed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Rates of C difficile infections, total nosocomial diarrheal episodes, and total nosocomial infections were prospectively followed in each study unit over 11 months.

RESULTS:

26,350 patients were admitted to the study units and hospitalized for 120,529 patient days. There were 947 nosocomial infections (7.86 per 1,000 patient days). Nosocomial C difficile- associated diarrhea defined by positivity to both toxin B (titer ≥1:10) and toxin A was detected in 32 patients (3.4% of all nosocomial infections). A significantly lower rate of nosocomial C difficile-associated diarrhea was observed with disposable thermometer use (0.16 per 1,000 patient days) compared with electronic thermometer use (0.37 per 1,000 patient days, relative risk [RR]=0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.21-0.93, P=.026). There was no difference in overall rates of nosocomial infection between the disposable and electronic groups (8.03 and 7.68 infections per 1,000 patient days, respectively; RR, 1.04; CI95, 0.92-1.19; P=.52) or in the overall rate of nosocomial diarrhea (3.34 and 3.40 per 1,000 patient days, respectively; RR, .98; CI95, 0.81-1.19; P=.87).

CONCLUSIONS:

The incidence of nosocomial C difficile diarrhea was reduced significantly by using single-use, disposable thermometers as compared with electronic thermometers, but there was no effect on either the overall rate of nosocomial diarrhea or the rate of total nosocomial infections.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Brooks, SE, Veal, RO, Kramer, M, Dore, L, Schupf, N, Adachi, M. Reduction in the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in an acute care hospital and a skilled nursing facility following replacement of electronic thermometers with single-use disposables. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:98103.Google Scholar
2.Smith, L, Prince, HN, Johnson, E. Bacteriologic studies on electronic hospital thermometers. Infect Control 1981;2:315316.Google Scholar
3.Brooks, S, Veal, R, Kramer, M, Adachi, M. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:574.Google Scholar
4.McAllister, TA, Roud, JA, Marshall, A, Holland, BM, Turner, TL. Outbreak of Salmonella eimsbuettel in newborn infants spread by rectal thermometers. Lancet 1986;12621264.Google Scholar
5.Livornese, LL, Dias, S, Samel, C, Romanowski, B, Taylor, S, May, T, et al.Hospital-acquired infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus fae-cium transmitted by electronic thermometers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:112116.Google Scholar
6.Scleupner, MA, Garner, DC, Sosnowski, KM, Schleupner, CJ, Barrett, LJ, Silva, E, et al.Concurrence of Clostridium difficile toxin A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, fecal lactoferrin assay, and clinical criteria with C difficile cytotoxin titer in two patient cohorts. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:17551759.Google Scholar
7.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.Google Scholar
8.Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CA, Hunting, KJ, Gwaltney, JM Jr.Hospital acquired infections, I: surveillance in a university hospital. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:251260.Google Scholar
9.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606608.Google Scholar
10.Documenta Geigy: Scientific Tables. Basle, Switzerland: JR Geigy; 1970:85.Google Scholar
11.Meinert, CL. Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct and Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986:83.Google Scholar
12.Kofsky, P, Rosen, L, Reed, J, Tolmie, M, Ufberg, D. Clostridium difficile—a common and costly diagnosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:244248.Google Scholar
13.Wilcox, MH, Cunniffe, JG, Trundle, C, Redpath, C. The costs associated with nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection. In: Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 09 15-18, 1996; New Orleans, LA. American Society of Microbiology; 1996:295. Abstract N16.Google Scholar
14.Blumenthal, I. Which thermometer? Lancet 1991;337:1483.Google Scholar
18
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A Randomized Crossover Study of Disposable Thermometers for Prevention of Clostridium difficile and Other Nosocomial Infections
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A Randomized Crossover Study of Disposable Thermometers for Prevention of Clostridium difficile and Other Nosocomial Infections
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A Randomized Crossover Study of Disposable Thermometers for Prevention of Clostridium difficile and Other Nosocomial Infections
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *