Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T03:38:33.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are We “Squeezing The Balloon” When Reducing the Risk of Occupational Infection? Reply to Pan et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ignacio Galed Placed
Ignacio Galed Placed*
Affiliation:
Servicio de Anatomia Patologica, Seccion de Citologia, Hospital Juan Canalejo, La Coruna, Spain
*
Servicio de Anatomia Patologica, Seccion de Citologia, Hospital Juan Canalejo, Xubias de Arriba 84, La Coruna, Spain (Ignacio_Galed@canalejo.org)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 95 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

References

1.Pan, A, Signorini, L, Magri, S, De Carli, G. Scalp needlestick injury during fine-needle aspiration cytologie evaluation without needle manipulation: William Tell in the laboratory, not quite. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Galed-Placed, I, Pertega-Diaz, S, Pita-Fernandez, S, Vazquez-Martul, E. Fine needle aspiration cytology without needle manipulation to reduce the risk of occupational infection in healthcare personnel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:336.Google Scholar