Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Clinical Features of Clostridium difficile–Associated Infections and Molecular Characterization of Strains: Results of a Retrospective Study, 2000-2004

  • Frédéric Barbut (a1) (a2) (a3), Béatrice Gariazzo (a1), Laetitia Bonné (a3), Valérie Lalande (a1) (a3), Béatrice Burghoffer (a3), Ralucca Luiuz (a1) and Jean-Claude Petit (a1) (a3)...
Abstract
Background.

Recent outbreaks of severe cases of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) reported in North America, the United Kingdom, and The Netherlands have emphasized the importance of an ongoing epidemiological surveillance of CDAD.

Objective.

To determine the epidemiology of CDAD over the years 2000-2004 and the rate of nosocomial transmission of C. difficile.

Design.

Retrospective survey of inpatients with CDAD and molecular characterization of the strains isolated.

Setting.

A 760-bed teaching hospital.

Methods.

All CDAD cases diagnosed from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2004, were reviewed. A CDAD case was defined as diarrhea in a hospitalized patient who had a stool specimen that tested positive for C. difficile cytotoxin or had a positive toxigenic culture result. CDAD was considered to be severe if a patient fulfilled at least 1 of the following 3 criteria: (1) presence of a fever (defined as temperature higher than 38.5°C), abdominal pain, and leukocyte count greater than 10,000 cells/mm3; (2) endoscopically or histologically proven pseudomembranous colitis; or (3) complications (defined as death with C. difficile infection as the primary or a contributing cause, toxic megacolon, perforation, toxic shock, and/or colectomy). CDAD was considered community-acquired if the diarrhea occurred in the patient within 72 hours after admission and if the patient had no history of hospitalization in the previous month; otherwise, CDAD was considered healthcare-associated. All the strains isolated were serogrouped and were characterized by toxinotyping and PCR ribotyping. Detection of toxin A, toxin B, and binary toxin was performed by PCR.

Results.

One hundred fifty-one cases of CDAD were diagnosed; 147 clinical records could be reviewed, and 131 strains were studied. The overall incidence of CDAD was 1.1 cases per 1,000 patients admitted, but incidence rates were higher in 2003-2004, compared with 2000-2002 (P = .017). Diarrhea was community acquired in 28 patients (19%). For patients with healthcare-associated CDAD, transmission of the strain from patient to patient (ie, infection with a strain of the same serogroup and PCR ribotype as the strain isolated from another patient hospitalized in the same ward or in a linked ward in the previous 2 months) was demonstrated in 12 cases (10.1%). Eleven percent of strains were positive for binary toxin. Binary toxin-positive strains were associated with more-severe diarrhea (P = .01 ) and with a higher case-fatality rate (P = .03). A specific clone of C. difficile (serogroup H, PCR ribotype sa026) accounted for 35 (26.7%) of all the strains isolated, but this clone was found both in healthcare-associated and community-acquired cases. Three strains belonged to toxinotype III, but only 1 was related to the hypervirulent clone involved in recent outbreaks.

Conclusion.

The incidence of CDAD is low in our hospital, and cross-infection is limited. These results also suggest that strains with binary toxin might be more virulent.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Hôpital Saint-Antoine, UHLIN, 184 Rue de Faubourg Saint-Antoine, Paris 75012, France (frederic.barbut@sat.ap-hop-paris.fr)
References
Hide All
1. F Barbut , JC Petit . Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7:405410.

2. CP Kelly , C Pothoulakis , JT LaMont . Clostridium difficile colitis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:257262.

3. TD Cartmill , SB Shrimpton , H Panigrahi , V Khanna , R Brown , IR Poxton . Nosocomial diarrhoea due to a single strain of Clostridium difficile: a prolonged outbreak in elderly patients. Age Ageing 1992;21:245249.

4. S Johnson , MH Samore , KA Farrow , et al. Epidemics of diarrhea caused by a clindamycin-resistant strain of Clostridium difficile in four hospitals. N Engl J Med 1999;341:16451651.

5. LV McFarland , ME Mulligan , RY Kwok , WE Stamm . Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 1989;320: 204-210.

7. DE Voth , JD Ballard . Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18:247263.

11. C Goncalves , D Deere , F Barbut , B Burghoffer , JC Petit . Prevalence and characterization of a binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase) from Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:19331939.

13. M Rupnik , N Karo , M Grabnar , H Kato . New types of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strains among Clostridium difficile isolates from Asia. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:11181125.

15. LC McDonald , GE Killgore , A Thompson , et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2005;353:24332441.

16. J Pepin , L Valiquette , ME Alary , et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. Cmaj 2004;171:466472.

19. EJ Kuijper , RJ Van den Berg , S Debast , et al. Clostridium difficile ribotype 027, toxinotype III, The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:827830.

24. M Rupnik . How to detect Clostridium difficile variant strains in a routine laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7:417420.

26. P Spigaglia , P Mastrantonio . Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:34703475.

28. F Barbut , P Leluan , G Antoniotti , A Collignon , A Sedallian , JC Petit . Value of routine stool cultures in hospitalized patients with diarrhea. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1995;14:346349.

31. F Barbut , M Delmee , JS Brazier , et al. A European survey of diagnostic methods and testing protocols for Clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:989996.

33. MM Olson , CJ Shanholtzer , JT Lee Jr, DN Gerding . Ten years of prospective Clostridium difficile-associated disease surveillance and treatment at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center, 1982-1991. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:371381.

42. B Svenungsson , LG Burman , K Jalakas-Pornull , A Lagergren , J Struwe , T Akerlund . Epidemiology and molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile strains from patients with diarrhea: low disease incidence and evidence of limited cross-infection in a Swedish teaching hospital. Clin Microbiol 2003;41:40314037.

45. H Pituch , D Kreft , P Obuch-Woszczatynski , et al. Clonal spread of a Clostridium difficile strain with a complete set of toxin A, toxin B, and binary toxin genes among Polish patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:472475.

47. B Geric , RJ Carman , M Rupnik , et al. Binary toxin-producing, large clostridial toxin-negative Clostridium difficile strains are enterotoxic but do not cause disease in hamsters. J Infect Dis 2006;193:11431150.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 199 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.