Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Comparing Bloodstream Infection Rates: The Effect of Indicator Specifications in the Evaluation of Processes and Indicators in Infection Control (EPIC) Study

  • Barbara I. Braun (a1), Stephen B. Kritchevsky (a2), Linda Kusek (a1), Edward S. Wong (a3), Steven L. Solomon (a4), Lynn Steele (a4), Cheryl L. Richards (a1), Robert P. Gaynes (a4), Bryan Simmons (a5) and Evaluation of Processes and Indicators in Infection Control (EPIC) Study Group...
Abstract
Objective.

Bloodstream infection (BSI) rates are used as comparative clinical performance indicators; however, variations in definitions and data-collection approaches make it difficult to compare and interpret rates. To determine the extent to which variation in indicator specifications affected infection rates and hospital performance rankings, we compared absolute rates and relative rankings of hospitals across 5 BSI indicators.

Design.

Multicenter observational study. BSI rate specifications varied by data source (clinical data, administrative data, or both), scope (hospital wide or intensive care unit specific), and inclusion/exclusion criteria. As appropriate, hospital-specific infection rates and rankings were calculated by processing data from each site according to 2-5 different specifications.

Setting.

A total of 28 hospitals participating in the EPIC study.

Participants.

Hospitals submitted deidentified information about all patients with BSIs from January through September 1999.

Results.

Median BSI rates for 2 indicators based on intensive care unit surveillance data ranged from 2.23 to 2.91 BSIs per 1000 central-line days. In contrast, median rates for indicators based on administrative data varied from 0.046 to 7.03 BSIs per 100 patients. Hospital-specific rates and rankings varied substantially as different specifications were applied; the rates of 8 of 10 hospitals were both greater than and less than the mean. Correlations of hospital rankings among indicator pairs were generally low (rs = 0-0.45), except when both indicators were based on intensive care unit surveillance (rs = 0.83).

Conclusions.

Although BSI rates seem to be a logical indicator of clinical performance, the use of various indicator specifications can produce remarkably different judgments of absolute and relative performance for a given hospital. Recent national initiatives continue to mix methods for specifying BSI rates; this practice is likely to limit the usefulness of such information for comparing and improving performance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Division of Research, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, One Renaissance Boulevard, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 (bbraun@jcaho.org)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. RP Wenzel , MB Edmond . The impact of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:174177.

3. WR Jarvis . Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17:552557.

5. D Pittet , D Tarara , RP Wenzel . Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1994;271:15981601.

7.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:481498.

10. L McKibben , T Horan , JI Tokars , et al. Guidance on public reporting of healthcare-associated infections: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33:217226.

12. SB Kritchevsky , BP Simmons , BI Braun . The Project to Monitor Indicators: a collaborative effort between the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995; 16:3335.

13. SB Kritchevsky , BI Braun , ES Wong , et al. Impact of hospital care on incidence of bloodstream infection: the Evaluation of Processes and Indicators in Infection Control study. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:193196.

15. BI Braun , RG Koss , JM Loeb . Integrating performance measurement data into the Joint Commission accreditation process. Eval Health Prof 1999; 22:283297.

16. JS Garner , WR Jarvis , TG Emori , TC Horan , JM Hughes . CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.

19. LI Iezzoni . Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:666674.

21. PS Romano , BK Chan , ME Schembri , JA Rainwater . Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals? Med Care 2002; 40:856867.

22. JB Dimick , HG Welch , JD Birkmeyer . Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 2004; 292:847851.

25. WE Trick , BM Zagorski , JI Tokars , et al. Computer algorithms to detect bloodstream infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10:16121620.

26. TG Emori , JR Edwards , DJ Culver , et al. Accuracy of reporting nosocomial infections in intensive-care-unit patients to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System: a pilot study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:308316.

29. SB Kritchevsky , BI Braun , PA Gross , CS Newcomb , CA Kelleher , BP Simmons . Definition and adjustment of Cesarean section rates and assessments of hospital performance. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11:283291.

34. DS Yokoe , J Anderson , R Chambers , et al. Simplified surveillance for nosocomial bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:657660.

35. S Hugonnet , H Sax , P Eggimann , JC Chevrolet , D Pittet . Nosocomial bloodstream infection and clinical sepsis. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10:7681.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.