Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:31:06.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the accuracy of two electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2019

Michelle E. Doll*
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Nadia Masroor
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Kaila Cooper
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Trina Trimmer
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Rachel Pryor
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Joseph Auricchio
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Jo Dee Armstrong-Novak
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Michael P. Stevens
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Gonzalo Bearman
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
*
Author for correspondence: Michelle E. Doll, 1300 E. Marshall Street, P.O. Box 980019, Richmond, VA 23298-0019. E-mail: michelle.doll@vcuhealth.org

Abstract

Interest in electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems (EHHMSs) is now widespread throughout the infection control community. We tested 2 types of EHHMS for accuracy. The type B EHHMS captured more HH events with superior accuracy. Hospitals considering an EHHMS should assess the technology’s ability to accurately capture HH performance in the clinical workflow.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allegranzi, B, Pittet, D. Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. J Hosp Infect 2009;73:305315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:S3S40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masroor, N, Doll, M, Stevens, M, Bearman, G. Approaches to hand hygiene monitoring: from low to high technology approaches. Intl J Infect Dis 2017;65:101104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, MA, Schweizer, ML, Polgreen, PM, et al. Automated and electronically assisted hand hygiene monitoring systems: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:472478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellingson, K, Polgreen, PM, Schnieder, A, et al. Healthcare personnel perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technology. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:10911096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, JM, Cooper, T, Lunde, A, Yin, J, Arbogast, J. Impact of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system trial on hand hygiene compliance in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and general medicine ward (GMW). In: Program and abstracts of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA); October 17–21, 2012; San Diego, CA. Abstract 1008.Google Scholar
Limper, HM, Garcia-Houchins, S, Slawsky, L, Hershow, RC, Landon, E. A validation protocol: assessing the accuracy of hand hygiene monitoring technology. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:10021004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineles, LL, Morgan, DJ, Limper, HM, et al. Accuracy of a radiofrequency identification (RFID) badge system to monitor hand hygiene behavior during routine clinical activities. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:144147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swoboda, SM, Earsing, K, Strauss, K, Lane, S, Lipsett, PA. Electronic monitoring and voice prompts improve hand hygiene and decrease nosocomial infections in an intermediate care unit. Crit Care Med 2004;32:358363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, JM. Electronic monitoring in combination with direct observation as a means to significantly improve hand hygiene compliance. Am J Infect Control 2017;45:528535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Doll et al. supplementary material

Doll et al. supplementary material
Download Doll et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 208.8 KB