Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Contact Precautions More Is Not Necessarily Better

  • Sorabh Dhar (a1) (a2), Dror Marchaim (a3), Ryan Tansek (a4), Teena Chopra (a1), Adnan Yousuf (a5), Ashish Bhargava (a1), Emily T. Martin (a1), Thomas R. Talbot (a6), Laura E. Johnson (a7), Ameet Hingwe (a8), Jerry M. Zuckerman (a9), Bartholomew R. Bono (a10), Emily K. Shuman (a11), Jose Poblete (a12), MaryAnn Tran (a13), Grace Kulhanek (a13), Rama Thyagarajan (a14), Vijayalakshmi Nagappan (a14), Carrie Herzke (a15), Trish M. Perl (a15) and Keith S. Kaye (a1)...
Abstract
Objective.

To determine whether increases in contact isolation precautions are associated with decreased adherence to isolation practices among healthcare workers (HCWs).

Design.

Prospective cohort study from February 2009 to October 2009.

Setting.

Eleven teaching hospitals.

Participants.

HCWs.

Methods.

One thousand thirteen observations conducted on HCWs. Additional data included the number of persons in isolation, types of HCWs, and hospital-specific contact precaution practices. Main outcome measures included compliance with individual components of contact isolation precautions (hand hygiene before and after patient encounter, donning of gown and glove upon entering a patient room, and doffing upon exiting) and overall compliance (all 5 measures together) during varying burdens of isolation.

Results.

Compliance with hand hygiene was as follows: prior to donning gowns/gloves, 37.2%; gowning, 74.3%; gloving, 80.1%; doffing of gowns/gloves, 80.1%; after gown/glove removal, 61%. Compliance with all components was 28.9%. As the burden of isolation increased (20% or less to greater than 60%), a decrease in compliance with hand hygiene (43.6%—4.9%) and with all 5 components (31.5%—6.5%) was observed. In multivariable analysis, there was an increase in noncompliance with all 5 components of the contact isolation precautions bundle (odds ratio [OR], 6.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-37.44]; P = .03) and in noncompliance with hand hygiene prior to donning gowns and gloves (OR, 10.1 [95% CI, 1.84—55.54]; P = .008) associated with increasing burden of isolation.

Conclusions.

As the proportion of patients in contact isolation increases, compliance with contact isolation precautions decreases. Placing 40% of patients under contact precautions represents a tipping point for noncompliance with contact isolation precautions measures.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Harper University Hospital, 3990 John R. Street, 5 Hudson, Detroit, MI 48201 (sdhar@med.wayne.edu)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

3. M Lujan , M Gallego , J Relio . Healthcare-associated infections: a useful concept? Curr Opin Crit Care 2009;15(5):419424.

7. LJ Strausbaugh , JD Siegel , RA Weinstein . Preventing transmission of multidrug-resistant bacteria in health care settings: a tale of 2 guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42(6):828835.

8. JD Siegel , E Rhinehart , M Jackson , L Chiarello ; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Am J Infect Control 2007;35(10 suppl 2):S65S164.

9. R Jain , SM Kralovic , ME Evans , et al.Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2011;364(15):14191430.

10. WC Huskins , CM Huckabee , NP O'Grady , et al.Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2011;364(15):14071418.

12. JA Jernigan , MG Titus , DH Groschel , S Getchell-White , BM Farr . Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143(5):496504.

13. S Slaughter , MK Hayden , C Nathan , et al.A comparison of the effect of universal use of gloves and gowns with that of glove use alone on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a medical intensive care unit. Ann Intern Med 1996;125(6):448456.

14. JM Leclair , J Freeman , BF Sullivan , CM Crowley , DA Goldmann . Prevention of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infections through compliance with glove and gown isolation precautions. N Engl J Med 1987;317(6):329334.

15. N Safdar , J Marx , NA Meyer , DG Maki . Effectiveness of preemptive barrier precautions in controlling nosocomial colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit. Am J Infect Control 2006;34(8):476483.

16. LB Gasink , PJ Brennan . Isolation precautions for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in healthcare settings. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009;22(4):339344.

17. BS Klein , WH Perloff , DG Maki . Reduction of nosocomial infection during pediatric intensive care by protective isolation. N Engl J Med 1989;320(26):17141721.

18. M Slota , M Green , A Farley , J Janosky , J Carrillo . The role of gown and glove isolation and strict handwashing in the reduction of nosocomial infection in children with solid organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 2001;29(2):405412.

20. SA Clock , B Cohen , M Behta , B Ross , EL Larson . Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: current recommendations and actual practice. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(2):105111.

23. K Gilbert , C Stafford , K Crosby , E Fleming , R Gaynes . Does hand hygiene compliance among health care workers change when patients are in contact precaution rooms in ICUs? Am J Infect Control 2010;38(7):515517.

24. D Pittet , S Hugonnet , S Harbarth , et al.Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356(9238):13071312.

25. DJ Morgan , DJ Diekema , K Sepkowitz , EN Perencevich . Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: a review of the literature. Am J Infect Control 2009;37(2)8593.

26. RL Zastrow . Emerging infections: the contact precautions controversy. Am J Nurs 2011;111(3):4753.

27. KB Kirkland , JM Weinstein . Adverse effects of contact isolation. Lancet 1999;354(9185):11771178.

28. DJ Morgan , HR Day , AD Harris , JP Furuno , EN Perencevich . The impact of contact isolation on the quality of inpatient hospital care. PLoS One 2011;6(7):e22190.

29. HT Stelfox , DW Bates , DA Redelmeier . Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA 2003;290(14):18991905.

30. P Hannigan , JW Shields , Handwashing and use of examination gloves. Lancet 1998;351(9102):571.

31. BN Doebbeling , MA Pfaller , AK Houston , RP Wenzel . Removal of nosocomial pathogens from the contaminated glove: implications for glove reuse and handwashing. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109(5):394398.

33. D Pittet . The Lowbury lecture: behaviour in infection control. J Hosp Infect 2004;58(1):113.

34. M Whitby , CL Pessoa-Silva , ML McLaws , et al.Behavioural considerations for hand hygiene practices: the basic building blocks. J Hosp Infect 2007;65(1):l8.

36. S Saint , LA Higgins , BK Nallamothu , C Chenoweth . Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? a brief report. Am J Infect Control 2003;31(6):354356.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 334 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.