Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Review of Clinical Trials of Skin Antiseptic Agents Used to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination

  • Anurag Malani (a1) (a2) (a3), Kim Trimble (a2), Vikas Parekh (a2), Carol Chenoweth (a1) (a2), Samuel Kaufman (a4) (a2) and Sanjay Saint (a5) (a4) (a2) (a3)...
Abstract

False-positive blood culture results may lead to prolonged hospitalization, inappropriate antibiotic administration, and increased healthcare costs. We conducted a review of the literature to assess the effect of skin antiseptic agents on the rate of false-positive blood culture Results. We found no clear evidence to suggest which antiseptic should be used to prevent false-positive Results. Studies suggest, however, a possible benefit from the use of prepackaged skin antiseptic kits and alcohol-containing antiseptics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105 (malanian@med.umich.edu)
References
Hide All
1.Weinstein, MP. Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:22752278.
2.Bates, DW, Goldman, L, Lee, TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization: the true consequences of false-positive Results. JAMA 1991;265:365369.
3.Little, JR, Murray, PR, Traynor, PS, Spitznagel, E. A randomized trial of povidone-iodine compared with iodine tincture for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on rates of blood culture contamination. Am J Med 1999;107:119125.
4.Surdulescu, S, Utamsingh, D, Shekar, R. Phlebotomy teams reduce blood-culture contamination rate and save money. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1998;6:6062.
5.Washington, JA II, Ilstrup, DM. Blood cultures: issues and controversies. Rev Infect Dis 1986;8:792802.
6.Calfee, DP, Farr, BM. Comparison of four antiseptic preparations for skin in the prevention of contamination of percutaneously drawn blood cultures: a randomized trial. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:16601665.
7.Mimoz, O, Karim, A, Mercat, A, et al.Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine as skin preparation before blood culture: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:834837.
8.Trautner, BW, Clarridge, IE, Darouiche, RO. Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and Chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:397401.
9.Strand, CL, Wajsbort, RR, Sturmann, K. Effect of iodophor vs iodine tincture skin preparation on blood culture contamination rate. JAMA 1993;269:10041006.
10.Weinbaum, FI, Lavie, S, Danek, M, Sixsmith, D, Heinrich, GF, Mills, SS. Doing it right the first time: quality improvement and the contaminant blood culture. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:563565.
11.King, TC, Price, PB. An evaluation of iodophors as skin antiseptics. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963;116:361365.
12.Champagne, S, Fussell, S, Scheifele, D. Evaluation of skin antisepsis prior to blood culture in neonates. Infect Control 1984;5:489491.
13.Lee, S, Schoen, I, Malkin, A. Comparison of use of alcohol with that of iodine for skin antisepsis in obtaining blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol 1967;47:646648.
14.Shahar, E, Wohl-Gottesman, BS, Shenkman, L. Contamination of blood cultures during venepuncture: fact or myth? Postgrad Med J 1990;66:10531058.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 292 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.