Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Efficiency of Hand Drying for Removing Bacteria From Washed Hands Comparison of Paper Towel Drying With Warm Air Drying

  • Yukiko Yamamoto (a1), Kazuhiro Ugai (a1) and Yasuko Takahashi (a2)
Abstract
Objective:

To evaluate warm air and paper towel drying for removing bacteria from washed hands.

Methods:

After hands were washed with non-antibacterial soap, they were dried using warm air with and without ultraviolet light, while being rubbed or held stationary, or paper towels. Each method was performed as a randomized trial using 30 hands.

Results:

Log colony-forming units (CFU) on palms and fingers increased significantly when hands were dried with warm air while being rubbed for 15 seconds (P < .001), and many bacteria remained at 30 seconds without ultraviolet light (P < .001). Holding hands stationary while drying significantly decreased log CFU on palms, fingers, and fingertips (P < .01 or < .001). Few CFU were detected on palms and fingers dried with ultraviolet light. Although log CFU of palms and fingers did not decrease after drying with three sheets of paper towel, those of fingertips decreased significantly (P < .001). For palms and fingers, log reductions were greater with warm air drying while holding hands stationary, paper towels, and warm air drying while rubbing hands. For fingertips, the log reduction was often greater with paper towels than with warm air.

Conclusions:

Holding hands stationary and not rubbing them was desirable for removing bacteria. Ultraviolet light reinforced the removal of bacteria during warm air drying. Paper towels were useful for removing bacteria from fingertips but not palms and fingers.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Basic Nursing Science, College of Nursing Art and Science Hyogo, 13-71 Kitaoji-cho, Akashi 673-8588, Japanyukiko_yamamoto@cnas.u-hyogo.ac.jp
References
Hide All
1.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 2002;51:144.
2.Lowbury, EJL, Lilly, HA, Bull, JP. Disinfection of hands: removal of transient organisms. Br Med J 1964;2:230233.
3.Ayliffe, GAJ, Babb, JR, Bridges, K, et al.Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin. JHyg (Camb) 1975;75:259274.
4.Jarvis, JD, Wynne, CD, Enwright, L, Williams, JD. Handwashing and antiseptic-containing soaps in the hospital. J Clin Pathol 1979;32:732737.
5.Ojajärvi, J. Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing. J Hyg (Camb) 1980; 85:193203.
6.Maki, DG, Zilz, MA, Alvarado, CJ. Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of four agents for handwashing. In: Nelson, JD, Grassi, C, eds. Current Chemotherapy and Infectious Disease. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1979:10891090.
7.Ayliffe, GAJ, Babb, JR, Davies, JG, Lilly, HA. Hand disinfection: a comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies. J Hosp Infect 1988;11:226243.
8.Zaragoza, M, Sallés, M, Gomez, J, Bayas, JM, Trilla, A. Handwashing with soap or alcoholic solutions? A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:258261.
9.Cardoso, CL, Pereira, HH, Zequim, JC, Guilhermetti, M. Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing a Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:327331.
10.Rotter, M. Handwashing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, ed. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:13391355.
11.Winnefeld, M, Richard, MA, Drancourt, M, Grob, JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:546550.
12.Guilhermetti, M, Hernandes, SED, Fukushigue, Y, Garcia, LB, Cardoso, CL. Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:105108.
13.Chamberlain, AN, Halablab, MA, Gould, DJ, Miles, RJ. Distribution of bacteria on hands and the effectiveness of brief and thorough decontamination procedures using non-medicated soap. Zbl Bakt 1997;285:565575.
14.Yamamoto, Y, Ugai, K, Takahashi, Y. Effective handwashing with non-medicated soap from the viewpoint of the changes in the number of bacteria on the hands in the handwashing process [in Japanese]. Environmental Infections 2002;17:329334.
15.Miller, ML, Davis, LA, Milanesi, LE. A field study evaluating the effectiveness of different hand soaps and sanitizers. Dairy Food Environ Sanitation 1994;14:155160.
16.Ansari, SA, Springthorpe, VS, Sattar, SA, Tostowaryk, W, Wells, GA. Comparison of cloth, paper, and warm air drying in eliminating viruses and bacteria from washed hands. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:243249.
17.Davis, JG, Blake, JR, White, DJ, Woodall, CM. The types and numbers of bacteria left on hands after normal washing and drying by various common methods. The Medical Officer 1969;31:235238.
18.Gustafson, DR, Vetter, EA, Larson, DR, et al.Effects of 4 hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands: a randomized trial. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:705708.
19.Blackmore, MA. A comparison of hand drying methods. Cater Health 1989;1:189198.
20.Montes, LF, Wilborn, WH. Location of bacterial skin flora. Br J Dermatol 1969;81(suppl 1):2326.
21.Meers, PD, Yeo, GA. Shedding of bacteria and skin squames after handwashing. J Hyg (Camb) 1978;81:99105.
22.Sprunt, K, Redman, W, Leidy, G. Antibacterial effectiveness of routine hand washing. Pediatrics 1973;52:264271.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed