Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-4hfp6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-13T18:17:52.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Five-Year Study of Needlestick Injuries: Significant Reduction Associated With Communication, Education, and Convenient Placement of Sharps Containers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Donna J. Haiduven ,
Tammy M. DeMaio  and
David A. Stevens
Donna J. Haiduven
Affiliation:
Infection Control Department, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California
Tammy M. DeMaio
Affiliation:
Infection Control Department, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California
David A. Stevens*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Department, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, and the, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California
*
Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, 751 South Bascom Ave., San Jose, CA 95128
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To decrease the numbers of needlesticks among healthcare workers.

Design:

All reported needlestick injuries at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, were reviewed, analyzed, and tabulated by the infection control department yearly from 1986 to 1990.

Setting:

A 588-bed county teaching hospital in San Jose, California, affiliated with Stanford University.

Participants:

All employees of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center who reported needlestick injuries on injury report forms.

Interventions:

From April to December 1987, more needle disposal containers were added to as many patient care areas and as close to the area of use as possible. Results of 1986, 1988, 1989, and 1990 analyses were communicated yearly to all personnel, extensive educational programs were conducted in 1987 and 1988, and educational efforts continued in 1989 and 1990.

Results:

In 1986, there were 259 needlestick injuries at our institution, 22% (32) from recapping. After needle disposal containers were added to all patient care areas, needlestick injuries for 1988 totalled 143, a 45% decrease in the total needlestick injuries and a 53% decrease in recapping injuries. Communication of results to all areas of the hospital and educational activities were started in 1987 and continued through the next 3 years. In 1989, there were 135 needlestick injuries, a decrease of 6% from 1988; recapping injuries decreased 40% from 1988. In 1990, there were 104 needlestick injuries, a 23% decrease since 1989, and a 33% decrease in recapping injuries. The total number of needlestick injuries from 1986 to 1990 decreased by 60%, and those injuries from recapping decreased by 81% to 89%.

Conclusions:

We have continued to monitor needlestick injuries, communicate findings to all personnel, and include needlestick prevention in educational programs. We contend that more convenient placement of needle disposal containers, communication of tidings, and education do decrease needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , May 1992 , pp. 265 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Whitby, M, Stead, P Najman, JM. Needlestick injury: impact of a recapping device and an associated education program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:220–225.Google Scholar
2. Linneman, CC, Cannon, C, De Ronde, M, Lanphear, B. Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Ebidemiol. 1991;12:214–219.Google Scholar
3. American Health Consultants. In-room sharps boxes appear to reduce only disposal injuries. Hosp Infect Control. 1989;16:41–42.Google Scholar
4. Edmond, M, Khakoo, R, McTaggart, B, Soloman, R. Effect of bedside needle disposal units on needle recapping frequency and needlestick injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:114–116.Google Scholar
5. Jagger, J, Pearson, Rl? A view from the cutting edge. Infection Control. 1987;8:51–52.Google Scholar
6. Krasinski, K, La Couture, R, Holzman, RS. Effect of changing needle disposal systems on needle puncture injuries. Infect Control. 1987;8:59–62.Google Scholar
7. Ribner, BS, Landry, MN, Gholson, GL, Linden, LA. Impact of a rigid, puncture resistant container system upon nekdlestick iniuries. Infect Control. 1987;8:63–66.Google Scholar
8. Roberts, S, Scharf, L. Appropriate needle disposal: implementing change to reduce injury and lessen risk. Am J Infect Control. 1986;14:32A–34A.Google Scholar
9. Weinstein, SA. Disposable needle and syringe containers. Infect Control. 1985;6:41–43.Google Scholar
10. Kennedy, DA Needlestick injuries: mechanisms and control. J Hosp Infect. 1988;12:315–322.Google Scholar
11. Sanborn, C, Luttrell, N, Hoffmann, K. Creating a safer environment for healthcare workers: implementing a point-of-use sharps disposal system. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 1988;12:24–31.Google Scholar
12. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Brand-Elnagger, J, Pearson, RD. Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl I Med. 1988;319:284–288.Google Scholar
13. de Carteret, JC. Needlestick injuries: an occupational health hazard for nurses. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal. 1987;35:119–123.Google Scholar
14. Jagger, J, Pearson, RD, Brand, JJ. Avoiding the hazards of sharp instruments. Lancet. 1986;i:1274.Google Scholar
15. Neuberger, JS, Harris, J, Kundin, WD, Bischone, A, Chin, TDY. Incidence of needlestick injuries in hospital personnel: implications for prevention. Am/Infect Control. 1984;2:171–176.Google Scholar
16. McCormick, RD. Maki, DG. Epidemiology of needlestick iniuries in hospital personnel. Am J Med. 1981;70:928–932.Google Scholar
17. Orient, JM. Assessing the risk of occupational acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus: implications for hospital policy. South Med J. 1990;83:1121–1127.Google Scholar
18. Mansour, AM. Needlestick injury in the OR facts and prevention. Today's OR Nurse. 1989;11:15–17.Google Scholar
19. Kelen, GD, Fritz, S, Qaqish, B, et al. Unrecognized human immunodeficiency virus in emergency department patients. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1645–50.Google Scholar
20. Jackson, MM, Dechairo, DC, Gardner, DE Perceptions and beliefs of nursing and medical personnel about needle-handling practices and needlestick injuries. Am J Infect Control. 1986;14:1–10.Google Scholar
21. McCray, E, The Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group. Occupational risk of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome among healthcare workers. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1127–1132.Google Scholar
22. Killian, K. Exstatix Statistical Analysis Software Program. San Jose, Calif: Strategic Mapping Inc.; 1990.Google Scholar
23. Crow, S. Disposable needle and syringe containers. Infection Control. 1985;6:41–43.Google Scholar
24. Wong, SW, Stotka, JL, Chinchilli, VM. Are universal precautions effective in reducing the numbers of occupational exposures among healthcare workers? JAMA. 1991;265:1123–1128.Google Scholar
25. Seto, WH, Ching, TY, Chu, YB, et al. Reduction in the frequency of needle recapping by effective education: a need for conceptual alteration. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:194–196.Google Scholar
26. Wright, GD, Farrer, JA. Potential for the prevention of “needle stick” injuries in hospitals. Med J Aust. 1990;152:111–112.Google Scholar
27. Huber, K, Sumner, W. Recapping the accidental needlestick problem. Am J Infect Control. 1987;15:127–130.Google Scholar
28. Bailey, E. Recapping needles safely using a recapping adapter. Am J Infect Control. 1986;14:30A–31A.Google Scholar
29. Williams, WW. Guidelines for infection control in hospital personnel. Infect Control. 1983: 4(suppl 4):326–349.Google Scholar
30. Morgan, DR. Needlestick injuries: how can we teach people better about risk assessment? J Hosp Infect. 1988;12:301–309.Google Scholar
31. Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI). Health devices. 1991;20:147–183.Google Scholar
32. Yassi, A, McGill, M. Determinants of blood and body fluid exposure in a large teaching hospital: hazards of the intermittent intravenous procedure. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19:129–135.Google Scholar
33. Wagner, M. High prices may hinder widespread use of needles with new safety features. Modern Healthcare. 1990;20:68.Google Scholar
34. Millam, D. Avoiding needlestick injuries. Nursing 90. 1990;20:61–64.Google Scholar
35. Hamory, BH. Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital. Am J Infect Control. 1983;11:174–177.Google Scholar