Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Hawthorne Effect in Infection Prevention and Epidemiology

  • Luke F. Chen (a1) (a2) (a3), Mark W. Vander Weg (a4) (a5) (a6), David A. Hofmann (a7) and Heather Schacht Reisinger (a4) (a5) (a8)

Abstract

The Hawthorne Effect is a prevalent observer effect that causes behavioral changes among participants of epidemiological studies or infection control interventions. The purpose of the review is to describe the origins of the Hawthorne Effect, to understand the term in relation to current scientific literature, to describe characteristics of the Hawthorne effect, and to discuss methods to quantify and overcome limitations associated with the Hawthorne Effect.

Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(12):1444–1450

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to Luke F. Chen, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (luke.chen@duke.edu).

References

Hide All
1. Haessler, S. The Hawthorne effect in measurements of hand hygiene compliance: a definite problem, but also an opportunity. BMJ Quality & Safety 2014, doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003507.
2. Mayo, E. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York, NY: MacMillan, 1933.
3. Jones, SRG. Was there a Hawthorne Effect? Am J Sociol 1992;98:451468.
4. Gittelsohn, J, Shankar, AV, West, KP, Ram, RM, Gnywali, T. Estimating reactivity in direct observation studies of health behaviors. Human Organization 1997;56:182189.
5. Haynes, SN, Horn, WF. Reactivity in behavioral observation: a review. Behavioral Assessment 1982.
6. Kompier, MA. The “Hawthorne effect” is a myth, but what keeps the story going? Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32:402412.
7. Parsons, HM. What happened at Hawthorne? New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies. Science 1974;183:922932.
8. Wickstrom, G, Bendix, T. The “Hawthorne effect”—what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scand J Work Environ Health 2000;26:363367.
9. Kolata, G. Scientific myths that are too good to die. New York Times, December 6, 1998, p. WR2.
10. McCambridge, J, Witton, J, Elbourne, DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:267277.
11. Dhar, S, Tansek, R, Toftey, EA, et al. Observer bias in hand hygiene compliance reporting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:869870.
12. Berthelot, JM, Le Goff, B, Maugars, Y. The Hawthorne effect: stronger than the placebo effect? Joint Bone Spine 2011;78:335336.
13. Fakih, MG, Watson, SR, Greene, MT, et al. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use: a statewide effort. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:255260.
14. Greene, MT, Fakih, MG, Fowler, KE, et al. Regional variation in urinary catheter use and catheter-associated urinary tract infection: results from a national collaborative. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:S99S106.
15. Lee, KK, Berenholtz, SM, Hobson, DB, Demski, RJ, Yang, T, Wick, EC. Building a business case for colorectal surgery quality improvement. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:12981303.
16. Braykov, NP, Eber, MR, Klein, EY, Morgan, DJ, Laxminarayan, R. Trends in resistance to carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins among clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in the United States, 1999–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:259268.
17. Cardboard cutout is an effective police officer. National Public RadioWeb site. http://www.npr.org/2013/08/07/209751426/the-last-word-in-business. Published 2013. Accessed August 25, 2015.
18. Ghosh, P. Cardboard cops patrol high-tech Bangalore’s busy streets. International Business Times, March 25, 2013.
19. Chen, LF, Carriker, C, Staheli, R, et al. Observing and improving hand hygiene compliance: implementation and refinement of an electronic-assisted direct-observer hand hygiene audit program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:207210.
20. Muchinsky, PM. Psychology Applied to Work. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning, 2003.
21. Harbarth, S, Pittet, D, Grady, L, et al. Interventional study to evaluate the impact of an alcohol-based hand gel in improving hand hygiene compliance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:489495.
22. Srigley, JA, Furness, CD, Baker, GR, Gardam, M. Quantification of the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance monitoring using an electronic monitoring system: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;0:17.
23. Creedon, SA. Hand hygiene compliance: exploring variations in practice between hospitals. Nurs Times 2008;104:3235.
24. McCarney, R, Warner, J, Iliffe, S, van Haselen, R, Griffin, M, Fisher, P. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:30.
25. Riggio, RE, Porter, LW. Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers, 2003.
26. Quick, JC, Nelson, DL. Principles of Organizational Behavior: Realities and Challenges. London: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011.
27. Olson, R, Verley, J, Santos, L, Salas, C. What we teach students about the Hawthorne studies: a review of content within a sample of introductory IO and OB textbooks. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 2004;41:2329.
28. Jex, SM, Britt, TW. Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
29. Schmidt, NA, Brown, JM. Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2014.
30. Ivancevich, JM, Matteson, MT, Konopaske, R. Organizational Behavior and Management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
31. Newstrom, JW, Davis, K. Human Behavior at Work. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
32. Storey, SJ, FitzGerald, G, Moore, G, et al. Effect of a contact monitoring system with immediate visual feedback on hand hygiene compliance. J Hosp Infect 2014;88:8488.
33. Pronovost, P. Sustaining and spreading improvement in hand hygiene compliance. J Qual Patient Safety 2015;41:125.
34. Ivers, N, Jamtvedt, G, Flottorp, S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD000259.
35. Thomas, HC. Viral Hepatitis, 4th ed. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, 1 (online resource).
36. Moore, ZS, Schaefer, MK, Hoffmann, KK, et al. Transmission of hepatitis C virus during myocardial perfusion imaging in an outpatient clinic. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:126132.
37. Baum, CG, Forehand, R, Zegiob, LE. A review of observer reactivity in adult-child interactions. J Behav Assess 1979;1:167178.
38. Monahan, T, Fisher, JA. Benefits of “observer effects”: lessons from the field. Qualitative Res 2010;10:357376.
39. Getting Around Hawthorne. Chaco Canyon Consulting Web site. http://www.chacocanyon.com/pointlookout/021002.shtml. Published 2002. Accessed August 25, 2015.
40. Pan, SC, Tien, KL, Hung, IC, et al. Compliance of health care workers with hand hygiene practices: independent advantages of overt and covert observers. PLoS One 2013;8:e53746.
41. Pan, SC, Lai, TS, Tien, KL, et al. Medical students’ perceptions of their role as covert observers of hand hygiene. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:231234.
42. Biffl, WL, Gallagher, AW, Pieracci, FM, Berumen, C. Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: a prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties. Patient Saf Surg 2015;9:5.
43. Krediet, AC, Kalkman, CJ, Bonten, MJ, Gigengack, AC, Barach, P. Hand-hygiene practices in the operating theatre: an observational study. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:553558.
44. Ford, S, Birmingham, E, King, A, Lim, J, Ansermino, JM. At-a-glance monitoring: covert observations of anesthesiologists in the operating room. Anesth Analg 2010;111:653658.
45. Pineles, LL, Morgan, DJ, Limper, HM, et al. Accuracy of a radiofrequency identification (RFID) badge system to monitor hand hygiene behavior during routine clinical activities. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:144147.
46. Armellino, D, Hussain, E, Schilling, ME, et al. Using high-technology to enforce low-technology safety measures: the use of third-party remote video auditing and real-time feedback in healthcare. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:17.
47. Yin, J, Reisinger, HS, Vander Weg, M, et al. Establishing evidence-based criteria for directly observed hand hygiene compliance monitoring programs: a prospective, multicenter cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:11631168.
48. Van Wart, M. Dynamics of Leadership in Public Service: Theory and Practice: Armonk. NY: ME Sharpe; 2005.
49. Padilla Bravo, C, Villanueva Ramírez, I, Neuendorff, J, Spiller, A. Assessing the impact of unannounced audits on the effectiveness and reliability of organic certification. Organic Agriculture 2013;3:95109.
50. Comeau, E, Lowry, D. Unannounced JCAHO survey. J Nurs Care Qual 2005;20:58.
51. Haas, JP, Larson, EL. Measurement of compliance with hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:614.
52. Usichenko, TI, Julich, A, Wendt, M. ‘Yes, we can’ utilize the Hawthorne effect to improve postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:659.
53. Feil, PH, Grauer, JS, Gadbury-Amyot, CC, Kula, K, McCunniff, MD. Intentional use of the Hawthorne effect to improve oral hygiene compliance in orthodontic patients. J Dent Educ 2002;66:11291135.
54. Lied, TR, Kazandjian, VA. A Hawthorne strategy: implications for performance measurement and improvement. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1998;6:201204.
55. Clark, D. ‘Internet of Things’ in Reach. Wall Street Journal January 5, 2014.
56. Gershenfeld, N, Krikorian, R, Cohen, D. The Internet of things. Scientific American 2004;291:76.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed