Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:29:29.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The importance of viruses in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Andrew F. Shorr*
Affiliation:
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
Daniel T. Ilges
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
Scott T. Micek
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri
Marin H. Kollef
Affiliation:
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
*
Author for correspondence: Andrew F. Shorr, E-mail: Andrew.shorr@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective:

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge. The importance of viruses in VAP is not established. We sought to determine the prevalence of viruses in VAP and the outcomes of viral VAP.

Design:

Retrospective study of VAP over 3 years. The frequency of a viral process represented the primary endpoint. Clinical outcomes served as secondary endpoints. We identified variables independently associated with a virus and conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the interaction between type of infection and patient characteristics.

Setting:

Tertiary-care referral center.

Patients:

The final cohort consisted of 710 patients and a virus was isolated in 5.1%.

Interventions:

None.

Results:

The most common viruses included: rhinovirus, influenza A, and cytomegalovirus. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with and without viral infections. In logistic regression, immunosuppression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44–6.14) and stem-cell transplantation (SCT, aOR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.17–10.99) were independently associated with a virus. The presence of either variable performed poorly as a screening test for a virus. In-hospital (22.4% vs 21.6%; P = .869) and 30-day (32.8% vs 27.9%; P = .448) mortality rates were similar between the cohorts, respectively. Sensitivity analyses restricted to patients without a mixed viral and bacterial infection or those who were immunocompetent yielded similar results.

Conclusion:

Although infrequent, a range of viruses may cause VAP. Viruses more often complicate SCT and immunosuppression, but one can isolate viruses in immunocompetent subjects. Viral VAP produces severe infection and results in high mortality rates. Clinical features do not differentiate viral from nonviral VAP.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mahmood, SN, Shorr, AF. Issues in antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: emerging concepts to improve outcomes. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021;22:15471553.10.1080/14656566.2021.1908997CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, S, Self, WH, Wunderink, RG, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2382.10.1056/NEJMoa1500245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shorr, AF, Fisher, K, Micek, ST, et al. The burden of viruses in pneumonia associated with acute respiratory failure: an underappreciated issue. Chest 2018;154:8490.10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cawcutt, K, Kalil, AC. Pneumonia with bacterial and viral coinfection. Curr Opin Crit Care 2017;23:385390.10.1097/MCC.0000000000000435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, NR, Shorr, AF. The evolving burden of viruses in pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2019;32:158162.10.1097/QCO.0000000000000536CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, HL, Hong, SB, Ko, GB, et al. Viral infection is not uncommon in adult patients with severe hospital-acquired pneumonia. PLoS One 2014;9:e95865.10.1371/journal.pone.0095865CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shorr, AF, Zilberberg, MD, Micek, ST, et al. Viruses are prevalent in nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia. Respir Med 2017;122:7680.10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilges, D, Ritchie, DJ, Krekel, T, et al. Assessment of antibiotic de-escalation by spectrum score in patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Open Forum Infect Dis 202;8:ofab508.10.1093/ofid/ofab508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalil, AC, Metersky, ML, Klompas, M, et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:e61e111.10.1093/cid/ciw353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlson, ME, Pompei, P, Ales, KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaus, WA, Draper, EA, Wagner, DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818829.10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loubet, P, Voiriot, G, Houhou-Fidouh, N, et al. Impact of respiratory viruses in hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective study. J Clin Virol 2017;91:5257.10.1016/j.jcv.2017.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aghdassi, SJS, Schwab, F, Peña Diaz, LA, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial SARS- CoV-2 infections in patients: results from a retrospective matched case-control study in a tertiary care university center. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022;11:9.10.1186/s13756-022-01056-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Lago, L, Machado, M, Gómez-Ruiz, MM, et al. Nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 involving vaccinated healthcare workers. Microbiol Spectr 2022;10:e0153221.10.1128/spectrum.01532-21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Shorr et al. supplementary material

Shorr et al. supplementary material

Download Shorr et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.6 KB