Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Incidence of Microperforation for Surgical Gloves Depends on Duration of Wear

  • Lars Ivo Partecke (a1), Anna-Maria Goerdt (a2), Inga Langner (a1), Bernd Jaeger (a3), Ojan Assadian (a4), Claus-Dieter Heidecke (a1), Axel Kramer (a2) and Nils-Olaf Huebner (a2)...
Abstract
Background.

The use of sterile gloves is part of general aseptic procedure, which aims to prevent surgical team members from transmitting infectious agents to patients during procedures performed in an operating room. In addition, surgical gloves also protect team members against patient-transmitted infectious agents. Adequate protection, however, requires that the glove material remain intact. The risk of perforations in surgical gloves is thought to correlate with the duration of wear, yet very few prospective studies have addressed this issue.

Methods.

We prospectively collected 898 consecutive pairs of used surgical gloves over a 9-month period in a single institution. After surgical team members wore the gloves during surgical procedures, the gloves were examined for microperforations using the watertight test described in European Norm 455, part 1. The gloves were analyzed as a pair; if 1 glove had a perforation, the pair was considered to be perforated. In addition, we evaluated the use of a hand cream that contained a suspension of cornstarch and ethanol to determine its potential influence on the rate of microperforation.

Results.

Wearing gloves for 90 minutes or less resulted in microperforations in 46 (15.4%) of 299 pairs of gloves, whereas wearing gloves for 91-150 minutes resulted in perforation of 54 (18.1%) of 299 pairs, and 71 of (23.7%) of 300 pairs were perforated when the duration of wear was longer than 150 minutes (P = .05). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the rates of microperforation for surgeons (56 [23.0%] of 244 pairs of gloves perforated), first assistants (43 [19.0%] of 226 pairs perforated), and surgical nurses (53 [20.5%] of 259 pairs perforated). Of 171 microperforations, 114 (66.7%) were found on the left hand glove (ie, the glove on subjects' nondominant hand), predominantly on the left index finger (55 [32.3%]). The use of the hand cream had no influence on the rate of microperforation.

Conclusion.

Because of the increase in the rate of microperforation over time, it is recommended that surgeons, first assistants, and surgical nurses directly assisting in the operating field change gloves after 90 minutes of surgery.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria (ojan.assadian@meduniwien.ac.at)
References
Hide All
1.Tanner, J. Surgical gloves: perforation and protection. J Perioper Pract 2006;16:148152.
2.Caillot, JL. Surgical glove use in France. J Chir 2005;142:226230.
3.European Committee for Standardization. EN 455. Medical gloves for single use. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2000.
4.Tanner, J, Parkinson, H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD003087.
5.Kralj, N, Beie, M, Hofmann, F. Surgical gloves-how well do they protect against infections? Gesundheitswes 1999;61:398403.
6.Ventolini, G, Neiger, R, McKenna, D. Decreasing infectious morbidity in cesarean delivery by changing gloves. J Reprod Med 2004;49:1316.
7.The German-Speaking Working Group for Hospital Hygiene (AWMF). Hand disinfection and hand hygiene. Hyg Med 2008;33:300-313. Available at: http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/WWW/AWMF/. Accessed March 27, 2009.
8.Chapman, S, Duff, P. Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:13541357.
9.Laine, T, Kaipia, A, Santavirta, J, Aarnio, P. Glove perforations in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: the feasibility of double gloving. Scand J Surg 2004;93:7376.
10.Eklund, AM, Ojajarvi, J, Laitinen, K, Valtonen, M, Werkkala, KA. Glove punctures and postoperative skin flora of hands in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:149153.
11.Brough, SJ, Hunt, TM, Barrie, WW. Surgical glove perforations. Br J Surg 1988;75:317.
12.Brown, JN. Surgeon protection: early recognition of glove perforation using a green under glove. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1996; 41:395396.
13.Burke, FJ, Baggett, FJ, Lomax, AM. Assessment of the risk of glove puncture during oral surgery procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:1821.
14.Al-Maiyah, M, Bajawa, A, Mackenney, P, et al. Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:556559.
15.Kojima, Y, Ohashi, M. Unnoticed glove perforations during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:10781080.
16.Maffulli, N, Capasso, G, Testa, V. Glove perforation in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 1991;11:2527.
17.Skaug, N. Micropunctures of rubber gloves used in oral surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1976;5:220225.
18.Marin-Bertolin, S, Gonzalez-Martinez, R, Gimenez, CN, Marquina Vila, P, Amorrortu-Velayos, J. Does double gloving protect surgical staff from skin contamination during plastic surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:956960.
19.Thomas, S, Agarwal, M, Mehta, G. Intraoperative glove perforation-single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination. Postgrad Med J 2001;77:458460.
20.Caillot, J-L, Paparel, P, Arnal, E, Schreiber, V, Voiglio, EJ. Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches, a prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system. World J Surg 2006;30:134138.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed