Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Obtaining Blood Cultures by Venipuncture versus from Central Lines Impact on Blood Culture Contamination Rates and Potential Effect on Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Reporting

  • John M. Boyce (a1) (a2), Jacqueline Nadeau (a3), Diane Dumigan (a1), Debra Miller (a4), Cindy Dubowsky (a5), Lenore Reilly (a4) and Carla V. Hannon (a4)...
Abstract
Objective.

Reduce the frequency of contaminated blood cultures that meet National Healthcare Safety Network definitions for a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).

Design.

An observational study.

Setting.

A 500-bed university-affiliated hospital.

Methods.

A new blood culture policy discouraged drawing blood samples from central lines. Phlebotomists were reeducated regarding aseptic technique when obtaining blood samples by venipuncture. The intravenous therapy team was taught how to draw blood samples by venipuncture and served as a backup when phlebotomists were unable to obtain blood samples. A 2-nurse protocol and a special supply kit for obtaining blood samples from catheters were developed. Rates of blood culture contamination were monitored by the microbiology laboratory.

Results.

The proportion of blood samples obtained for culture from central lines decreased from 10.9% during January–June 2010 to 0.4% during July–December 2012 (P< .001). The proportion of blood cultures that were contaminated decreased from 84 (1.6%) of 5,274 during January–June 2010 to 21 (0.5%) of 4,245 during January–June 2012 (P< .001). Based on estimated excess hospital costs of $3,000 per contaminated blood culture, the reduction in blood culture contaminants yielded an estimated annualized savings of $378,000 in 2012 when compared to 2010. In mid-2010, 3 (30%) of 10 reported CLABSIs were suspected to represent blood culture contamination compared with none of 6 CLABSIs reported from mid-November 2010 through June 2012 (P = 0.25).

Conclusions.

Multiple interventions resulted in a reduction in blood culture contamination rates and substantial cost savings to the hospital, and they may have reduced the number of reportable CLABSIs.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Yale-New Haven Hospital, 20 York Street, New Haven, CT 06510-3202 (John.Boyce@ynhh.org)
References
Hide All
1.Pronovost, P, Needham, D, Berenholtz, S, et al.An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:27252732.
2.Sexton, DJ, Chen, LF, Anderson, DJ. Current definitions of central line–associated bloodstream infection: is the emperor wearing clothes? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:12861289.
3.Shuman, EK, Washer, LL, Arndt, JL, et al.Analysis of central line–associated bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit after implementation of central line bundles. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:551553.
4.Teplick, R. Caveats for comparing catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates. Crit Care Med 2011;39:392394.
5.Beekmann, SE, Diekema, DJ, Huskins, WC, et al.Diagnosing and reporting of central line–associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:875882.
6.Dumigan, DG, Reilly, L, Acompora, M, et al.Beyond the “bundle”: interventions to decrease catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a community teaching hospital. Paper presented at: 22nd European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases meeting; April 3, 2012; London.
7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health-care Safety Network e-news. 2010;5(3):15. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/Newsletters/NHSN_NL_OCT_2010_final.pdf. Accessed January 2013.
8. Johns Hopkins Hospital. Vascular access device (VAD) policy, adult 2012. https://cdn.community360.net/app/jh/csts/clabsi/JHH_VAD_Policy.pdf.
9.Mathew, A, Gaslin, T, Dunning, K, Ying, J. Central catheter blood sampling: the impact of changing the needleless caps prior to collection. J Infus Nurs 2009;32:212218.
10.Sherertz, RJ, Karchmer, TB, Palavecino, E, Bischoff, W. Blood drawn through valved catheter hub connectors carries a significant risk of contamination. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;30:15711577.
11.Hall, KK, Lyman, JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:788802.
12.Weinstein, MP. Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:22752278.
13.Dwivedi, S, Bhalla, R, Hoover, DR, Weinstein, MP. Discarding the initial aliquot of blood does not reduce contamination rates in intravenous-catheter-drawn blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:29502951.
14.Bates, DW, Goldman, L, Lee, TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. JAMA 1991;265:365369.
15.Souvenir, D, Anderson, DE JrPalpant, S, et al.Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:19231926.
16.Zwang, O, Albert, RK. Analysis of strategies to improve cost effectiveness of blood cultures. J Hosp Med 2006;1:272276.
17.Gander, RM, Byrd, L, DeCrescenzo, M, Hirany, S, Bowen, M, Baughman, J. Impact of blood cultures drawn by phlebotomy on contamination rates and health care costs in a hospital emergency department. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:10211024.
18.Alahmadi, YM, Aldeyab, MA, McElnay, JC, et al.Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:233236.
19.Snyder, SR, Favoretto, AM, Baetz, RA, et al.Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem 2012;45:9991011.
20.Schifman, RB, Strand, CL, Meier, FA, Howanitz, PJ. Blood culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 640 institutions and 497,134 specimens from adult patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:216221.
21.Weinbaum, FI, Lavie, S, Danek, M, Sixsmith, D, Heinrich, GF, Mills, SS. Doing it right the first time: quality improvement and the contaminant blood culture. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:563565.
22.Bekeris, LG, Tworek, JA, Walsh, MK, Valenstein, PN. Trends in blood culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks study of 356 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:12221225.
23.Mermel, LA, Allon, M, Bouza, E, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:145.
24.Eskira, S, Gilad, J, Schlaeffer, P, et al.Reduction of blood culture contamination rate by an educational intervention. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:818821.
25.Suwanpimolkul, G, Pongkumpai, M, Suankratay, C. A randomized trial of 2% chlorhexidine tincture compared with 10% aqueous povidone-iodine for venipuncture site disinfection: effects on blood culture contamination rates. J Infect 2008;56:354359.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 378 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1886 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.