Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:52:54.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Reporting of Clostridium difficile and Improvements in Diagnostic Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Simon D. Goldenberg
Simon D. Goldenberg*
Affiliation:
Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; and King's College, London, United Kingdom
*
St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom (simon.goldenberg@gstt.nhs.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 32 , Issue 12 , December 2011 , pp. 1231 - 1232
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

References

1. Fong, KS, Fatica, C, Hall, G, et al. Impact of PCR testing for Clostridium difficile on incident rates and potential on public reporting: is the playing field level? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(9):932–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Cohen, SH, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:431–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Crobach, MJ, Dekkers, OM, Wilcox, MH, Kuijper, EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ES-CMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15: 1053–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ferguson, JK, Cheng, AC, Gilbert, GL, et al. Clostridium difficile laboratory testing in Australia and New Zealand: national survey results and Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases recommendations for best practice.Pathology. 2011;43:482–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Goldenberg, SD, Price, NM, Tucker, D, Wade, P, French, GL. Mandatory reporting and improvements in diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection: an incompatible dichotomy? J Infect. 2011;62: 363–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Goldenberg, SD, French, GL. Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile, a comprehensive survey of laboratories in England. J Hosp Infect 2011;79:4–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chand, MA, Fleming, MJ, Wellsteed, S, Kelsey, MC. Impact of changes in Clostridium difficile diagnostic testing on detection C. difficile infection and all England mandatory surveillance data. J Hosp Infect 2011;79:8–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed