Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Quantifying the Impact of Extranasal Testing of Body Sites for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization at the Time of Hospital or Intensive Care Unit Admission

  • James A. McKinnell (a1) (a2), Susan S. Huang (a3), Samantha J. Eells (a1), Eric Cui (a3) and Loren G. Miller (a1)...
Objective.</title><p>Methicillin-resistant <span class='italic'>Staphylococcus aureus</span> (MRSA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections. Recent legislative mandates require nares screening for MRSA at hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in many states. However, MRSA colonization at extranasal sites is increasingly recognized. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify the yield of extranasal testing for MRSA.</p></sec><sec id='abs2'><title>Design.</title><p>We searched MEDLINE from January 1966 through January 2012 for articles comparing nasal and extranasal screening for MRSA colonization. Studies were categorized by population tested, specifically those admitted to ICUs and those admitted to hospitals with a high prevalence (6% or greater) or low prevalence (less than 6%) of MRSA carriers. Data were extracted using a standardized instrument.</p></sec><sec id='abs3'><title>Results.</title><p>We reviewed 4,381 abstracts and 735 articles. Twenty-three articles met the criteria for analysis (<span class='italic'>n</span> = 39,479 patients). Extranasal MRSA screening increased the yield by approximately one-third over nares alone. The yield was similar at ICU admission (weighted average, 33%; range, 9%–69%) and hospital admission in high-prevalence (weighted average, 37%; range, 9%–86%) and low-prevalence (weighted average, 50%; range, 0%–150%) populations. For comparisons between individual extranasal sites, testing the oropharynx increased MRSA detection by 21% over nares alone; rectum, by 20%; wounds, by 17%; and axilla, by 7%.</p></sec><sec id='abs4'><title>Conclusions.
Objective.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infections. Recent legislative mandates require nares screening for MRSA at hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in many states. However, MRSA colonization at extranasal sites is increasingly recognized. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify the yield of extranasal testing for MRSA.

Design.

We searched MEDLINE from January 1966 through January 2012 for articles comparing nasal and extranasal screening for MRSA colonization. Studies were categorized by population tested, specifically those admitted to ICUs and those admitted to hospitals with a high prevalence (6% or greater) or low prevalence (less than 6%) of MRSA carriers. Data were extracted using a standardized instrument.

Results.

We reviewed 4,381 abstracts and 735 articles. Twenty-three articles met the criteria for analysis (n = 39,479 patients). Extranasal MRSA screening increased the yield by approximately one-third over nares alone. The yield was similar at ICU admission (weighted average, 33%; range, 9%–69%) and hospital admission in high-prevalence (weighted average, 37%; range, 9%–86%) and low-prevalence (weighted average, 50%; range, 0%–150%) populations. For comparisons between individual extranasal sites, testing the oropharynx increased MRSA detection by 21% over nares alone; rectum, by 20%; wounds, by 17%; and axilla, by 7%.

Conclusions.

Extranasal MRSA screening at hospital or ICU admission in adults will increase MRSA detection by one-third compared with nares screening alone. Findings were consistent among subpopulations examined. Extranasal testing may be a valuable strategy for outbreak control or in settings of persistent disease, particularly when combined with decolonization or enhanced infection prevention protocols.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1124 West Carson Street, Box 466, Torrance, CA 90502 (dr.mckinnell@yahoo.com)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. HS Sader , JM Streit , TR Fritsche , RN Jones . Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated from European medical centres: results of the Daptomycin Surveillance Programme (2002-2004). Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12(9):844852.

4. AC Fluit , CL Wielders , J Verhoef , FJ Schmitz . Epidemiology and susceptibility of 3,051 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 25 university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY study. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39(10):37273732.

5. R Jain , SM Kralovic , ME Evans , et al. Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 2011;364(15):14191430.

6. A Robicsek , JL Beaumont , SM Paule , et al. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(6):409418.

8. JE Coia , GJ Duckworth , DI Edwards , et al. Guidelines for the control and prevention of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities. J Hosp Infect 2006;63(suppl 1):S1S44.

9. JD Siegel , E Rhinehart , M Jackson , L Chiarello . Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006. Am J Infect Control 2007;35(10 suppl 2):S165S193.

10. SS Huang , DS Yokoe , VL Hinrichsen , et al. Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43(8):971978.

12. N Safdar , J Marx , NA Meyer , DG Maki . Effectiveness of preemptive barrier precautions in controlling nosocomial colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit. Am J Infect Control 2006;34(8):476483.

13. JC Lucet , X Paoletti , I Lolom , et al. Successful long-term program for controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2005;31(8):10511057.

14. MW Climo , KA Sepkowitz , G Zuccotti , et al. The effect of daily bathing with Chlorhexidine on the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: results of a quasi-experimental multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 2009; 37(6):18581865.

17. R Batra , AC Eziefula , D Wyncoll , J Edgeworth . Throat and rectal swabs may have an important role in MRSA screening of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(9):17031706.

18. S Harbarth , J Schrenzel , G Renzi , C Akakpo , B Ricou . Is throat screening necessary to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients upon admission to an intensive care unit? J Clin Microbiol 2007;45(3):10721073.

21. PJ Bickel , EA Hammel , JW O'Connell . Sex bias in graduate admissions: data from Berkeley. Science 1975;187(4175):398404.

24. N Troillet , Y Carmeli , MH Samore , et al. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19(3):181185.

27. S Esposito , A Capuano , S Noviello , et al. Modification of patients' endogenous bacterial flora during hospitalization in a large teaching hospital in Naples. J Chemother 2003;15(6):568573.

29. R Beigi , J Hanrahan . Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA colonization rates among gravidas admitted to labor and delivery: a pilot study. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2007;2007:70876.

30. A Samad , D Banerjee , N Carbarns , S Ghosh . Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in surgical patients, on admission to a Welsh hospital. J Hosp Infect 2002; 51(1):4346.

31. JP Furuno , JC McGregor , AD Harris , et al. Identifying groups at high risk for carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(5):580585.

33. C Dupeyron , B Campillo , JP Richardet , CJ Soussy . Long-term efficacy of mupirocin in the prevention of infections with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a gastroenterology unit. J Hosp Infect 2006;63(4):385392.

38. U Rohr , M Wilhelm , G Muhr , S Gatermann . Qualitative and (semi)quantitative characterization of nasal and skin methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage of hospitalized patients. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2004;207(1):5155.

39. JC Lucet , S Chevret , I Durand-Zaleski , C Chastang , B Regnier . Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at admission to the intensive care unit: results of a multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(2): 181188.

40. PL Ho . Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci before and after intensive care unit admission. Crir Care Med 2003;31(4):11751182.

42. WC Albrich , S Harbarth . Health-care workers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA? Lancet Infect Dis 2008;8(5):289301.

45. SS Huang , SL Rifas-Shiman , DK Warren , et al. Improving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance and reporting in intensive care units. J Infect Dis 2007;195(3):330338.

46. JM Boyce , G Potter-Bynoe , C Chenevert , T King . Environmental contamination due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: possible infection control implications. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18(9):622627.

48. DJ Morgan , E Rogawski , KA Thorn , et al. Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria to healthcare workers' gloves and gowns after patient contact increases with environmental contamination. Crit Care Med 2012;40(4):10451051.

49. AM Treakle , KA Thorn , JP Furuno , SM Strauss , AD Harris , EN Perencevich . Bacterial contamination of health care workers' white coats. Am J Infect Control 2009;37(2):101105.

51. WR Jarvis , AA Jarvis , RY Chinn . National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at United States health care facilities, 2010. Am J Infect Control 2012;40(3): 194200.

52. S Chang , AK Sethi , BC Eckstein , U Stiefel , JL Cadnum , CJ Donskey . Skin and environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among carriers identified clinically versus through active surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48(10):14231428.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 12 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 157 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.