Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Respiratory viruses on personal protective equipment and bodies of healthcare workers

  • Linh T. Phan (a1), Dagmar Sweeney (a2), Dayana Maita (a3), Donna C. Moritz (a3), Susan C. Bleasdale (a3), Rachael M. Jones (a1) and for the CDC Prevention Epicenters Program (a1) (a2) (a3)...

Abstract

Objective:

To characterize the magnitude of virus contamination on personal protective equipment (PPE), skin, and clothing of healthcare workers (HCWs) who cared for patients having acute viral infections.

Design:

Prospective observational study.

Setting:

Acute-care academic hospital.

Participants:

A total of 59 HCWs agreed to have their PPE, clothing, and/or skin swabbed for virus measurement.

Methods:

The PPE worn by HCW participants, including glove, face mask, gown, and personal stethoscope, were swabbed with Copan swabs. After PPE doffing, bodies and clothing of HCWs were sampled with Copan swabs: hand, face, and scrubs. Preamplification and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods were used to quantify viral RNA copies in the swab samples.

Results:

Overall, 31% of glove samples, 21% of gown samples, and 12% of face mask samples were positive for virus. Among the body and clothing sites, 21% of bare hand samples, 11% of scrub samples, and 7% of face samples were positive for virus. Virus concentrations on PPE were not statistically significantly different than concentrations on skin and clothing under PPE. Virus concentrations on the personal stethoscopes and on the gowns were positively correlated with the number of torso contacts (P < .05). Virus concentrations on face masks were positively correlated with the number of face mask contacts and patient contacts (P < .05).

Conclusions:

Healthcare workers are routinely contaminated with respiratory viruses after patient care, indicating the need to ensure that HCWs complete hand hygiene and use other PPE to prevent dissemination of virus to other areas of the hospital. Modifying self-contact behaviors may decrease the presence of virus on HCWs.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Rachael M. Jones, Email: rachael.jones@utah.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Aspects of these data were presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Expo on May 21, 2019, in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Morgan, DJ, Liang, SY, Smith, CL, et al. Frequent multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:716721.
2. Munoz-Price, LS, Arheart, KL, Mills, JP, et al. Associations between bacterial contamination of health care workers’ hands and contamination of white coats and scrubs. Am J Infect Control 2012;40(9):e245e248.
3. Okamoto, K, Rhee, Y, Schoeny, M, et al. Impact of doffing errors on healthcare worker self-contamination when caring for patients on contact precautions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 209;40:559565.
4. Phan, LT, Maita, D, Mortiz, DC, et al. Personal protective equipment doffing practices of healthcare workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2019;16:575581.
5. Casanova, L, Teal, LJ, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, et al. Assessment of self-contamination during removal of personal protective equipment for Ebola patient care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37(10):16.
6. Casanova, L, Alfano-Sobsey, E, Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, Sobsey, M. Virus transfer from personal protective equipment to healthcare employees’ skin and clothing. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:12911293.
7. Kwon, JH, Burnham, C-AD, Reske, KA, et al. Assessment of healthcare worker protocol deviations and self-contamination during personal protective equipment donning and doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:10771083.
8. Mumma, JM, Durso, FT, Ferguson, AN, et al. Human factors risk analyses of a doffing protocol for Ebola-level personal protective equipment: mapping errors to contamination. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:950958.
9. Kramer, A, Schwebke, I, Kampf, G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:130.
10. Phan, LT, Maita, D, Mortiz, DC, Bleasdale, SC, Jones, RM. Environmental contact and self-contact patterns of healthcare workers: implications for infection prevention and control. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69(suppl 3):S178S184.
11. Phan, LT, Sweeney, DM, Bleasdale, SC, Jones, RM. Respiratory viruses in the patient environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019.
12. Holleck, JL, Merchant, N, Lin, S, Gupta, S. Can education influence stethoscope hygiene? Am J Infect Control 2017;45:811812.
13. Knecht, VR, Mcginniss, JE, Shankar, HM, et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial contamination on stethoscopes in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:17.
14. Park, GW, Lee, D, Treffiletti, A, Hrsak, M, Shugart, J, Vinjé, J. Evaluation of a new environmental sampling protocol for detection of human norovirus on inanimate surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:59875992.
15. Nicas, M, Jones, RM. Relative Contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk. Risk Anal 2009;29:12921303.
16. Jones, R, Xia, J. Occupational exposures to influenza among healthcare workers in the United States. J Occup Environ Hyg 2016;13:213222.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Phan et al. supplementary material
Phan et al. supplementary material

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB

Respiratory viruses on personal protective equipment and bodies of healthcare workers

  • Linh T. Phan (a1), Dagmar Sweeney (a2), Dayana Maita (a3), Donna C. Moritz (a3), Susan C. Bleasdale (a3), Rachael M. Jones (a1) and for the CDC Prevention Epicenters Program (a1) (a2) (a3)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed