Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:07:32.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in Infection Prevention Practices in Dialysis Facilities: Results From the National Opportunity to Improve Infection Control in ESRD (End-Stage Renal Disease) Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2015

Carol E. Chenoweth*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Stephen C. Hines
Affiliation:
Health Research and Educational Trust, Chicago, Illinois
Kendall K. Hall
Affiliation:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
Rajiv Saran
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
John D. Kalbfleisch
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Teri Spencer
Affiliation:
TB Spencer Consulting, Fallbrook, California
Kelly M. Frank
Affiliation:
Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, Waterloo, Iowa
Diane Carlson
Affiliation:
Renal Network of the Upper Midwest, St. Paul, Minnesota
Jan Deane
Affiliation:
Renal Network of the Upper Midwest, St. Paul, Minnesota
Erik Roys
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Natalie Scholz
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Casey Parrotte
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Joseph M. Messana
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
*
Address correspondence to Carol E. Chenoweth, MD, 3119 Taubman Center, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5378 (cchenow@umich.edu).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe patient care across hemodialysis facilities enrolled in the National Opportunity to Improve Infection Control in ESRD (end-stage renal disease) (NOTICE) project in order to evaluate adherence to evidence-based practices aimed at prevention of infection.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four hemodialysis facilities were randomly selected from among 772 facilities in 4 end-stage renal disease participating networks. Facility selection was stratified on dialysis organization affiliation, size, socioeconomic status, and urban/rural status.

MEASUREMENTS

Trained infection control evaluators used an infection control worksheet to observe 73 distinct infection control practices at the hemodialysis facilities, from October 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012.

RESULTS

There was considerable variation in infection control practices across enrolled facilities. Overall adherence to recommended practices was 68% (range, 45%–92%) across all facilities. Overall adherence to expected hand hygiene practice was 72% (range, 10%–100%). Compliance to hand hygiene before and after procedures was high; however, during procedures hand hygiene compliance averaged 58%. Use of chlorhexidine as the specific agent for exit site care was 19% overall but varied from 0% to 35% by facility type. The 8 checklists varied in the frequency of perfect performance from 0% for meeting every item on the checklist for disinfection practices to 22% on the arteriovenous access practices at initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there are many areas for improvement in hand hygiene and other infection prevention practices in end-stage renal disease. These NOTICE project findings will help inform the development of a larger quality improvement initiative at dialysis facilities.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(7):802–806

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: central line–associated blood stream infections—United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:243248.Google Scholar
2. Patel, PR, Kallen, AJ, Arduino, MJ. Epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;56:566577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2009 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2009.Google Scholar
4. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48:S1322.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for preventing transmission of infections among chronic hemodialysis patients. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:143; Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5005a1.htm Google Scholar
6. O’Grady, NP, Alexander, M, Burns, MA, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter–related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162e193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection control requirements for dialysis facilities and clarification regarding guidance on parenteral medication vials. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:875876. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5732a3.htm Google Scholar
8. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions for Coverage for End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities. Fed Regist 2008;73:20293. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2008-04-15/pdf/08-1102.pdf Google Scholar
9. Pisoni, RL, Arrington, CJ, Albert, JM, et al. Facility hemodialysis vascular access use and mortality in countries participating in DOPPS: an instrumental variable analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53:475491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. University of Michigan Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center. Guide to the Dialsysis Facility Reports: Overview, Methodology, and Interpretation, July 2014. Available at: https://www.dialysisdata.org/sites/default/files/content/Methodology/DFRGuide.pdf Google Scholar
11. Shimokura, G, Weber, DJ, Miller, WC, Wurtzel, H, Alter, MJ. Factors associated with personal protective equipment and hand hygiene among hemodialysis staff. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:100107.Google Scholar
12. Shimokura, G, Chai, F, Weber, DJ, et al. Patient-care practices associated with an increased prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among chronic hemodialysis patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:415424.Google Scholar
13. Pronovost, P, Needham, D, Berenholtz, S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:27252732.Google Scholar
14. Fakih, MG, Watson, SR, Greene, MT, et al. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use: a statewide effort. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:255260.Google Scholar
15. Klevens, RM, Edwards, JR, Andrus, ML, et al. NHSN Participants in Outpatient Dialysis Surveillance. Dialysis surveillance report: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)–data summary for 2006. Semin Dial 2008;21:2428.Google Scholar
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reducing bloodstream infections in an outpatient hemodialysis center—New Jersey, 2008–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61:169173.Google Scholar
17. Patel, PR, Yi, SH, Booth, S, et al. Bloodstream infection rates in outpatient hemodialysis facilities participating in a collaborative prevention effort: a quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;62:322330.Google Scholar