Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:00:24.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1.1.7. Polarization of the Zodiacal Light: First Results from Skylab

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J. G. Sparrow ,
J. L. Weinberg  and
R. C. Hahn
J. G. Sparrow
Affiliation:
Space Astronomy Laboratory, State University of New York at Albany
J. L. Weinberg
Affiliation:
Space Astronomy Laboratory, State University of New York at Albany
R. C. Hahn
Affiliation:
Space Astronomy Laboratory, State University of New York at Albany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A brief description is given of the Skylab ten color photoelectric photometer and the programs of measurements made during Skylab missions SL-2 and SL-3. Results obtained on the polarized brightness of zodiacal light at five points on the antisolar hemisphere are discussed and compared with other published data for the north celestial pole, south ecliptic pole, at elongation 90 degrees on the ecliptic, and at two places near the north galactic pole.

Information

Type
1 Zodiacal Light
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 31: Interplanetary Dust and Zodiacal Light , 1976 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1976

References

Beggs, D. W., Blackwell, D. E., Dewhirstand, D. W. Wolstencroft, R. D., 1964, Further Observations of the Zodiacal Light from a High Altitude Station and Investigation of the Interplanetary Plasma III. Photoelectric Measurements of Polarization, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 128, 419–430.Google Scholar
Behr, A. and Siedentopf, H., 1953, Untersuchungen über Zodiakallicht und Gegenschein nach lichtelektrischen Messungen auf dem Jungfraujoch, Zeits. für Astrophys. 32, 19–50.Google Scholar
Divari, N. B. and Krylova, S. N., 1973, On the Influence of the Atmospheric Dust on the Zodiacal Light Polarization, in Evolutionary and Physical Properties of Meteoroids, NASA SP-319, 275–280.Google Scholar
Dumont, R., 1965, Séparation des composantes atmosphérique, interplanétaire et stellaire du ciel nocturne a 5000A. Application a la photometrie de la lumière zodiacale et du gegenschein, Ann. d’Astrophys. 28, 265–320.Google Scholar
Dumont, R. and Sanchez Martinez, F., 1966, Polarisation du ciel nocturne et polarisation de la lumière zodiacale vers 5000A, sur l’ensemble de la sphere celeste, Ann. d’Astrophys. 29, 113–118.Google Scholar
Dumont, R. and Sanchez Martinez, F., 1970, Note on Results and Present Research Subjects at Observatorio del Teide (Tenerife) about Zodiacal Light and Green Atmospheric Continuum Photometry, in Trans. IAU. XIVB, (DeJager, C. and Jappel, A., editors), 166, (Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.).Google Scholar
Dumont, R. and Sanchez Martinez, F., 1975, Zodiacal Light Photopolarimetry II. Gradients along the Ecliptic and the Phase Functions of Interplanetary Dust, Astron. and Astrophys., in press.Google Scholar
Elsässer, H., 1958, Neue Helligkeits- und Polarisationsmessungen am Zodiakallicht und ihre Interpretation, Die Sterne. 34, 166–169.Google Scholar
Elsässer, H., 1963, The Zodiacal Light, Planet. Space Sci. 11, 1015–1033.Google Scholar
Frey, A., Hoffmann, W., Lemke, D. and Thum, C., 1974, Photometry of the Zodiacal Light with the Balloon-Borne Telescope THISBE, Astron and Astrophys. 36, 447–454.Google Scholar
Gillett, F. C., 1966, Zodiacal Light and Interplanetary Dust, Thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Hayes, D. S. and Latham, D. W., 1975, A Rediscussion of the Atmospheric Extinction and the Absolute Spectral-Energy Distribution of Vega, Astrophys. J., 197, 593–601.Google Scholar
Ingham, M. F. and Jameson, R. F., 1968, Observations of the Polarization of the Night Sky and a Model of the Zodiacal Cloud Normal to the Ecliptic Plane, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 140, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, R. F., 1970, Observations and a Model of the Zodiacal Light, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 150. 207–213.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. S., 1954, The Solar Constant, J. Meteorol. 11, 431–438.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. L., Mitchell, R. I., Iriarteand, B. Wisniewski, W. Z., 1966, UBVRIJKL Photometry of the Bright Stars, Comm. Lunar and Planetary Lab. No. 63, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Labs, D. and Neckel, H., 1970, Transformation of the Absolute Solar Radiation Data into the International Practical Temperature Scale of 1968, Solar Phys. 15, 79–87.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. I. and Johnson, H. L., 1969, Thirteen-Color Narrow-Band Photometry of One Thousand Bright Stars, Comm. Lunar and Planetary Lab. No. 32, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. W., 1961, Three-Color Photometry of the Zodiacal Light, Astrophys. J. 133, 668–674.Google Scholar
Sparrow, J. G. and Ney, E. P., 1968, OSO-B2 Satellite Observations of Zodiacal Light, Astrophys. J. 154, 783–787.Google Scholar
Sparrow, J. G. and Ney, E. P., 1972, Observations of the Zodiacal Light from the Ecliptic to the Poles, Astrophys. J. 174, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, J. G., Weinberg, J. L., and Hahn, R. C., 1975, The 10-Color Gegenschein/Zodiacal Light Photometer, Applied Optics (Skylab Issue), in press.Google Scholar
Stebbins, J.and Kron, G. E., 1957, Six-Color Photometry of Stars. X. The Stellar Magnitude and Color Index of the Sun, Astrophys. J. 126, 266–280.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. L., 1964, The Zodiacal Light at 5300A, Ann. d’Astrophys. 27, 718–738.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. L., 1976, Space Observations of the Zodiacal Light, this Volume.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. L., Mannand, H. M. Hutchison, P. B., 1968, Polarization of the Nightglow: Line Versus Continuum, Planet. Space Sci. 16, 1291–1296.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. L., Sparrowand, J. G. Hahn, R. C., 1975, The Skylab Ten Color Photoelectric Polarimeter, Space Sci. Instrumentation, in press.Google Scholar
Wolstencroft, R. D. and Rose, L. J., 1967, Observations of the Zodiacal Light from a Sounding Rocket, Astrophys. J. 147, 271–292.Google Scholar